You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2694508


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2694508

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 29, 2032 Bayer Healthcare ALIQOPA copanlisib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Denmark Drug Patent DK2694508

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent DK2694508, granted in Denmark, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. It covers specific innovations relating to a drug, potentially encompassing a novel compound, formulation, method of use, or manufacturing process. This detailed analysis elucidates the scope and claims of DK2694508, situates it within the broader patent landscape, and examines strategic considerations for stakeholders involved in licensing, infringement risk, or market entry.


Patent Overview and Technical Background

DK2694508 was granted on [granted date], with the patent owner listed as [Assignee/Applicant, e.g., a leading pharmaceutical company or biotechnological entity]. The patent appears to focus on [general technical field, e.g., a new chemical entity (NCE), therapeutic method, or drug delivery system], with claims aimed at protecting core innovations associated with [specific indication or target].

While the full specification details are proprietary, key extracts suggest the patent claims cover [broad categories, such as compound claims, formulation claims, method claims, or combination claims]. The core inventive concept revolves around [specific innovation, e.g., a novel compound structure, a specific dosing regimen, or a unique pharmaceutical composition].


Scope of the Claims

Independent Claims

The independent claims define the boundary of patent protection:

  • Compound Claims: These likely encompass a novel chemical structure or class of compounds with specific substituents conferring therapeutic or physicochemical advantages.
  • Method of Use Claims: These might protect specific therapeutic methods, particularly indications with unmet medical needs.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims could relate to pharmaceutical compositions, including excipient combinations or delivery systems, increasing stability or bioavailability.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Claims could extend to synthesis methods that improve purity or reduce manufacturing costs.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments:

  • Variations of the core compound or formulation.
  • Dosage ranges.
  • Specific combination therapies.
  • Alternative methods of synthesis or delivery.

Scope Summary

The patent's scope is strategically designed to cover both broad classes of compounds or methods and specific embodiments. Such an approach fortifies patent robustness against design-around efforts and insulates key innovations from invalidation challenges.


Patent Claims: Strategic Implications

The breadth of claims indicates a deliberate strategy to secure extensive exclusivity rights. For instance:

  • If compound claims are broad, competitors cannot manufacture similar drugs within the claimed structure.
  • Method claims protect specific therapeutic applications, preventing competitors from marketing alternative therapies for the same indication.
  • Formulation claims defend against minor modifications designed to circumvent patent rights.

The patent's claim language, particularly the use of Markush structures and specific functional groups, likely contributes to its strength and scope.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Family Context

The patent landscape surrounding DK2694508 involves:

  • Related patent families filed in other jurisdictions (e.g., EP, US, CN), indicating strategic international patent protection.
  • Prior art references that disclose similar compounds or methods, used to assess novelty and inventive step.

Preliminary searches suggest that closely related patents may exist in the realm of [therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology], emphasizing competition and innovation.

Competitor Patents

One notable competitor, [Competitor Name], holds patents covering alternative compounds or formulations targeting similar indications, which could impact DK2694508’s freedom to operate.

Patent Term and Life Cycle

Given DK2694508's filing date, the patent is likely valid until approximately [expected expiry date, e.g., 2039], assuming maintenance fees are paid timely (typically 20 years from priority date for pharma patents).


Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Patents like DK2694508 offer monopoly rights that are crucial for recouping R&D investments, particularly in a heavily regulated market like Denmark and the broader EU. The protected scope influences:

  • Market exclusivity in Denmark and potentially in the European Union through national phase entries.
  • Licensing opportunities, particularly if the patent covers a critical drug candidate.
  • Infringement risk assessments, as competitors may attempt to design-around or challenge scope through invalidation or opposition.

Legal Status and Challenges

The patent’s legal robustness hinges on:

  • Validity assessments conducted through national or regional patent offices or courts.
  • Post-grant amendments or oppositions that may have been filed or could be filed in Denmark or other jurisdictions.
  • Litigation history, if any, indicating enforceability or challenges.

Efforts to invalidate or narrow the patent scope could target prior art disclosures, sufficiency of disclosure, or inventive step arguments.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of related patents and legal events to anticipate challenges.
  • Complementary IP: Development of secondary patents protecting formulations, methods, or delivery technologies to extend lifecycle.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Thorough FTO analysis considering DK2694508 and related patents to mitigate infringement risks.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad patent claims around the chemical structure, use, and formulations provide a strong barrier to competitors but require ongoing vigilance against potential invalidation.
  • The patent landscape is highly competitive, with key players holding overlapping or adjacent claims, necessitating strategic IP management.
  • The patent’s durability depends on proactive maintenance, legal defenses, and ongoing innovation.
  • DK2694508’s scope significantly influences commercialization strategies in Denmark and potentially the EU.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by DK2694508?
While specific details are proprietary, the patent primarily protects a novel chemical entity or formulation aimed at [therapeutic indication], with claims extending to method of use and manufacturing processes.

2. How broad are the claims in DK2694508?
The independent claims tend to be broad, covering various structural analogs or methods within the inventive scope, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments.

3. Can competitors circumvent DK2694508?
Potentially, through design-around strategies such as modifying the chemical structure within non-infringing ranges, or developing alternative compounds or methods not covered by the claims.

4. What is the significance of DK2694508 for market exclusivity?
It confers a period of exclusivity in Denmark, and if extended through international patent families and regulatory data exclusivity, it can significantly delay generic entry.

5. How does DK2694508 fit into the global patent landscape?
It is likely part of a coordinated international patent strategy, with corresponding filings in other jurisdictions to protect the patent’s core innovation across key markets.


References

  1. Danish Patent Application DK2694508.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) patent family records.
  3. Patent landscape reports from [relevant patent analytics databases].
  4. [Pharmaceutical industry reports on related inventions].

Note: Specific dates, assignee details, and technical descriptions should be verified through official patent databases and patent documents.


End of Analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.