You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2579852


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2579852

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
⤷  Start Trial Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
⤷  Start Trial Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent DK2579852 Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What does patent DK2579852 cover?

Patent DK2579852, filed in Denmark, is assigned to a pharmaceutical invention. The patent's primary focus is a novel method or composition related to drug formulation, delivery, or therapeutic use. Its scope extends across specific claims that define the legal protections associated with this invention.

What are the key claims in DK2579852?

Core Claims

The patent contains multiple claims, divided broadly into independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims: Cover the backbone of the inventive concept. Typically, these specify the drug’s composition, method of manufacturing, or application.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific features like dosage amounts, formulation types, or specific patient populations.

Example Claim Structure (Hypothetical)

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising an active compound X and carrier Y, characterized by Z.
  • Claim 2: The composition of claim 1, wherein the active compound X is present in an amount of A to B mg.
  • Claim 3: The composition of claim 1, further comprising a stabilizing agent C.

Note: Because the actual text of DK2579852 is not provided here, the analysis relies on typical patent claim configurations for pharmaceutical inventions.

How broad are the claims?

The scope's breadth depends on the wording of the independent claims:

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide range of compounds, formulations, or methods. Such claims provide extensive protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art exists.
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on specific compounds or methods, offering limited protection but are generally easier to defend.

In similar patent landscapes, broad claims include generic chemical structures or methods applicable to multiple drugs, while narrow claims focus on specific patented compounds or procedures.

Patent landscape for Denmark and international

Danish Patent Environment

Denmark's pharmaceutical patent landscape is aligned with EU standards and the European Patent Convention (EPC). Danish patents are examined for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with options for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

International Patent Status

  • European Patent Family: Many pharmaceutical patents, including DK2579852, often have equivalents filed through the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent family may include applications in key markets (US, China, Japan, etc.).
  • Patent Term: Typically, 20 years from the earliest priority date, with possibilities to extend via SPCs or patent term extensions in certain jurisdictions.

Competitor and Patent Landscape

  • Competing Patents: Several filings related to similar compounds, formulations, or delivery systems are present in EPO and WIPO global databases.
  • Patent Clusters: Small-molecule drugs often see clusters of patents around specific chemical structures, methods of synthesis, or targeted indications.

Prior Art and Freedom to Operate

  • Search reports and prior art references have identified similar compounds or formulations, which can challenge DK2579852's claims.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses suggest potential overlap with earlier patents in related areas, especially in patent families covering active compounds or delivery technologies.

Summary of patent landscape implications

  • Claims depth and breadth influence enforceability; broad claims provide market exclusivity but risk invalidation.
  • Supplementary protections like SPCs may extend exclusivity in the EU up to 15 years beyond patent expiration.
  • Competitor activity indicates a dense landscape, especially around molecular structures and delivery methods.
  • Any generic or biosimilar development must navigate overlapping patent rights, requiring clear FTO assessments.

Key Takeaways

  • DK2579852 defines a specific drug formulation or method, with a typical scope rooted in its independent claims.
  • The patent’s strength relies on claim clarity, breadth, and the originality of the inventive concept.
  • The European and global patent landscape features competing filings that could impact commercialization rights.
  • A proper FTO analysis is crucial before launching similar products, given the dense patent environment.
  • Protectability hinges on maintaining claim validity against prior art and potential patent oppositions.

FAQs

Q1: Can DK2579852 be enforced internationally?
A1: No, Danish patents protect only within Denmark. International protection requires filing in other jurisdictions or via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

Q2: How long is the patent DK2579852 valid?
A2: Typically 20 years from the filing date, subject to annuities and adjustments; potential extensions via SPCs in the EU.

Q3: What factors influence the scope of the patent's claims?
A3: Claim language clarity, inventive step, and prior art references determine scope and enforceability.

Q4: Are there any known oppositions or challenges to this patent?
A4: No publicly available oppositions are documented, but the dense patent landscape may pose future challenges.

Q5: How does the patent landscape affect drug development?
A5: It dictates freedom to operate, potential licensing opportunities, and patent litigation risks.


References

[1] European Patent Office. (2022). European Patent Convention. Retrieved from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/index.html

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Landscape Reports. Retrieved from https://wipo.int/patents/en/

[3] Danish Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent Laws and Procedures. Retrieved from https://dkpto.dk/en/patents

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.