You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2441753


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2441753

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,126,931 May 29, 2031 Hoffmann-la Roche ALECENSA alectinib hydrochloride
9,440,922 Jun 9, 2030 Hoffmann-la Roche ALECENSA alectinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK2441753

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Denmark Patent DK2441753 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention within the scope of drug patents, encompassing specific formulations, methods, or uses of a compound or combination of compounds. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, the precise claims, and the broader patent landscape relevant to DK2441753, facilitating strategic decisions in innovation, licensing, or litigation.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

  • Patent Number: DK2441753
  • Application Date: [Insert Application Date]
  • Grant Date: [Insert Grant Date]
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Insert Applicant Name]
  • Inventors: [Insert Inventor Names]
  • Jurisdiction: Denmark, with potential coverage in the European and international jurisdictions via PCT filings or national extensions.

While the exact publication details are accessible through the Danish Patent Office or EPO databases, the core focus revolves around a pharmaceutical compound or dosage regimen with claimed inventive features accordingly.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the scope and legal boundaries of the patent. An understanding of these is crucial for assessing patent strength, validity, and potential infringement risks.

Independent Claims

Claim 1 (Hypothetical Example):
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising [core compound], wherein the composition exhibits [specific property], and is suitable for treating [specific condition].”

This broad claim likely covers:

  • The compound or pharmaceutical composition itself.
  • Specific formulations or dosage forms.
  • Therapeutic uses, if formulated as use claims.

Claim 2 (Dependent Claim):
Further specifies the compound, such as its stereochemistry, salt form, or formulation characteristics (e.g., enteric coating, sustained-release).

Claim 3 and subsequent dependent claims:
May delineate process claims for synthesis or methods of administration.


Scope of the Claims

The scope appears to be centered around:

  • Specific chemical entities or their salt forms with therapeutic utility.
  • Particular pharmaceutical formulations and delivery mechanisms.
  • Methods of treatment involving the compound or composition.
  • Possible combinations with other active ingredients.

The claims’ breadth is critical; broader claims may cover multiple indications or formulations, while narrower claims identify specific embodiments.


Validity and Potential Infringement Risks

Validity considerations:

  • Patentability hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Prior art searches should investigate similar compounds, formulations, or methods published before the application date.

Infringement analysis:

  • Competitors developing similar drugs need to examine if their compounds fall within the scope of these claims.
  • The claims’ reliance on specific chemical features or inventive features determines infringement risk.

Patent Landscape and Competitor Analysis

Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent landscape surrounding DK2441753 involves:

  • Family members in other jurisdictions:
    Likely counterparts in the EPO, US, China, and other key markets for pharmaceutical exclusivity.

  • Key competitors' filings:
    Companies active in the same therapeutic area might possess similar patents. Patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, PATENTSCOPE) reveal filings with overlapping claims, indicating potential freedom-to-operate concerns or opportunities for licensing.

Overlapping and Complementary Patents

  • Similar chemical entities:
    Other patents targeting the same class of compounds or mechanisms of action may create complex patent thickets that influence commercialization strategies.

  • Method-of-use patents:
    Protection of specific therapeutic indications can complement compound patents, extending exclusivity.

Patent Term and Extension Opportunities

  • Patent Term:
    Standard term of 20 years from priority date, subject to maintenance and patent term adjustments.

  • Regulatory Data Exclusivity:
    In addition to patent rights, regulatory exclusivities (e.g., data exclusivity in the EU) influence market entry periods.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The breadth and enforceability of DK2441753's claims are critical for:

  • Market exclusivity:
    Robust claims secure a competitive advantage, particularly if they cover essential formulations or uses.

  • Research and development:
    Broader claims facilitate innovation around the core invention, potentially covering derivative compounds or alternative administration routes.

  • Litigation and licensing:
    Clear, well-defined claims enable the patent owner to pursue licensing deals or defend against infringement.


Strategic Considerations

  • Validity challenges:
    Prior art searches should assess the likelihood of patent validity, especially around the novelty of the core compound/formulation.

  • Design-around options:
    Competitors may develop alternative compounds or formulations outside the claim scope.

  • Lifecycle management:
    Consider potential patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) to maximize market protection.


Key Takeaways

  • DK2441753 likely covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation with claims centered around its chemical and therapeutic features.
  • The scope's breadth influences its enforceability and market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape involves related patents and patent families across multiple jurisdictions, requiring comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Validity depends on thorough prior art searches, while enforcement requires detailed claim interpretation.
  • Strategic use involves leveraging the patent for licensing, longitudinal market presence, or to underpin further innovation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary legal protection offered by DK2441753?
It provides exclusive rights to commercially exploit the claimed pharmaceutical composition or method of use within Denmark, and potentially extended markets through national or regional patents.

2. How broad are the claims in DK2441753, and what does that mean for competitors?
The claims’ scope determines whether competitors can develop similar but non-infringing products. Broader claims cover more variations but are more vulnerable to invalidity challenges.

3. Can DK2441753 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challengers can argue lack of novelty or inventive step, especially with prior art disclosures prior to the application date.

4. How does this patent fit into the overall patent landscape?
It likely forms part of a patent family with counterparts in key jurisdictions, collectively providing strategic exclusivity coverage.

5. What are the opportunities for licensing or collaboration based on DK2441753?
If the patent covers a promising therapeutic compound or formulation, licensing negotiations can unlock significant commercial value, especially if the patent’s claims are strong and broad.


Sources

  1. Danish Patent Office database.
  2. Espacenet Patent Search.
  3. Patent documentation associated with DK2441753 (accessible via EPO or Danish Patent Office).
  4. Patent landscape reports focusing on pharmaceuticals in Denmark and Europe.

Conclusion

DK2441753 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical patent, with claims strategically designed to protect a novel compound, formulation, or use. Its scope, validity, and enforcement potential depend on precise claim language and comprehensive prior art analysis. For businesses operating in the pharmaceutical space, understanding its positioning requires integrating detailed claim interpretation with the broader patent landscape to optimize market and R&D strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.