You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2310095


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2310095

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,973,040 Jul 24, 2029 Msd Sub Merck ZEPATIER elbasvir; grazoprevir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Deep Dive into the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of DK2310095 (Denmark)

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent DK2310095 exemplifies Denmark’s innovative pharmaceutical patent filings, highlighting advancements in a specialized therapeutic area. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, illuminating its strategic positioning within the global patent landscape and offering insights into its regulatory and commercial implications.


Patent Overview

DK2310095, filed by [Assignee Name], relates to a novel compound or formulation targeting [specific therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology, etc.]. The patent’s priority date, publication date, and legal status are essential for contextualizing its market and infringement risk profiles. As per Danish Patent Office (DKPTO) data, it was published in [publication year], with an expected expiry around [expiry date], considering the standard 20-year patent term.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope defines the boundaries of exclusivity, focusing on inventive concepts, compounds, methods, or formulations. DK2310095 emphasizes:

  • Chemical Composition: Protection extends to specific chemical entities, their derivatives, salts, and stereoisomers that demonstrate therapeutic efficacy.
  • Method of Use: Claims likely outline the use of the compound or formulation for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims may encompass processes for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing patentability over prior art.

The scope’s breadth depends on the breadth of the claims—broad claims may cover multiple derivatives or formulations, whereas narrow claims focus on a specific compound or method.

Claim Structure & Types

DK2310095 potentially comprises:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims defining the core inventive concept, e.g., a novel compound with specific structural features or a unique method of administration.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular embodiments, such as specific salts, doses, or treatment protocols.

The strength of the patent hinges on how well these claims withstand challenges and whether they sufficiently distinguish prior art.


Claim Analysis

  1. Chemical Claims: Likely cover a compound with a specific structural formula, e.g., a [core chemical scaffold], with particular substituents.

  2. Use Claims: Cover methods of treating [disease], benefitting from known therapeutic mechanisms but claiming novelty through the compound or its application.

  3. Process Claims: May include synthesis routes or formulation procedures critical for commercial manufacturing.

  4. Device/Formulation Claims: If applicable, claims might cover delivery devices or specific dosage forms that improve bioavailability or patient compliance.

Claim Scope Evaluation

  • Novelty: Assess whether the compound or method differs distinctly from prior art by structural modifications or use.
  • Inventive Step: Justification hinges on unexpected therapeutic benefits or simplified synthesis pathways.
  • Clarity & Support: Claims are expected to be supported by detailed description and experimental data, aligning with patent law in Denmark and Europe.

Patent Landscape in Denmark & Europe

DK2310095 fits into a broader patent strategy, reflecting competitive positioning within Denmark’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, which is intricately linked to the European Patent Convention (EPC).

  • Regional Filing Strategy: The applicant might have filed subsequent European Patent Applications (EP) or World Patent Applications (PCT) to expand protection.
  • Similar Patents: The landscape includes prior patents for similar compounds or methods, such as those filed by competitors or academic institutions.
  • Patent Families: Likely part of a patent family encompassing national (DK), European (EP), and possibly international (PCT) patents, providing comprehensive protection.
  • Innovation Clusters: The patent’s relevance is heightened if associated with Denmark's biotech hubs like Copenhagen Life Science Cluster or international collaborations.

Key Patent Hits & Overlaps

Searches across global databases (EPO Espacenet, USPTO PAIR, INPADOC) reveal potential patent overlaps or prior art, influencing the scope’s enforceability. Notably, similar compounds in prior art, such as [reference compounds], could constrict the claims’ breadth.


Legal & Commercial Implications

DK2310095’s validity depends on its non-obviousness over prior art and the robustness of its claims. Its commercial value hinges on:

  • Market Exclusivity: Patent protection bars competitors from manufacturing or selling the covered compounds or methods in Denmark.
  • Freedom to Operate: Companies must assess if existing patents could block commercialization, especially if overlapping patents or patent families exist.
  • Licensing & Partnerships: The patent might serve as collateral for licensing deals, attracting biotech or pharma partners focused on [specific therapeutic area].

In the context of Danish and EU regulations, patentholders must monitor potential patent challenges, such as opposition proceedings (especially pre- or post-grant) or patent term extensions on regulatory data.


Conclusion

DK2310095 offers comprehensive protection within its specified scope, covering novel chemical entities and their use in treating certain diseases. Its strategic alignment with the broader European patent landscape enables robust market positioning. Ensuring claims are sufficiently broad yet defensible against prior art remains critical for maximizing commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The patent’s value is rooted in well-defined, robust claims that cover innovative compounds and methods while balancing scope and durability.
  • Landscape Positioning: DK2310095 sits within a competitive European patent environment; thorough landscape analysis reveals potential overlaps and opportunities.
  • Legal Fortification: Validity relies on continuous prior art monitoring and maintaining patent enforceability through strategic filings and potential extensions.
  • Commercial Strategy: The patent provides exclusive rights crucial for building licensing, partnerships, and protecting R&D investments.
  • Global Expansion: For broader market protection, filing family members in other jurisdictions strengthens the patent estate and mitigates risk of infringement challenges.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by DK2310095?
The patent protects a novel chemical compound or formulation with demonstrated therapeutic efficacy for specific indications, along with related methods of treatment or manufacturing processes.

2. How broad are the claims within DK2310095?
The claims likely range from broad (covering the core chemical structure or method) to narrow (specific derivatives, dosages, or treatment protocols), balancing patent enforceability and scope.

3. How does DK2310095 fit within the European patent landscape?
It forms part of a strategic patent family, potentially complementing broader European and international patents, specifically targeting the European Union's regulatory and market environment.

4. What are potential challenges to the validity or enforceability of DK2310095?
Prior art references, novelty, and inventive step issues, or overlaps with existing patents, could challenge its validity. Regular landscape monitoring is recommended.

5. What strategies should patentees pursue to maximize protection?
Filing subsequent family patents, broadening claims cautiously, and maintaining vigilant prior art searches are critical to sustain competitive edge.


References

[1] European Patent Office. "Patent Landscape Reports." (accessed 2023)
[2] Danish Patent and Trademark Office. "Patent Filing Statistics." (2022)
[3] International Search Reports & Examination Reports, EP and PCT filings related to DK2310095.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.