You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1853250


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1853250

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,758,891 Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
8,034,375 Feb 13, 2027 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
8,268,348 Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
9,101,543 Aug 21, 2026 Bristol-myers ABRAXANE paclitaxel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Patent DK1853250

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Denmark Patent DK1853250, granted in 2018, pertained to innovative pharmaceutical compositions and methods, ostensibly targeting a specific therapeutic area. As a significant regional patent, its scope encompasses novel formulations or methods of treatment that may impact multiple stakeholders, including competitors, generic manufacturers, and R&D entities. This analysis delineates the patent’s scope, scrutinizes its claims, and explores the broader patent landscape context within Denmark and globally.


Scope and Objective of DK1853250

DK1853250 primarily aims to protect an innovative drug composition or therapeutic method, with claims reflecting both composition of matter and process claims. The patent’s scope is tailored to cover specific chemical entities, combinations, or treatment protocols deemed novel and inventive over prior art.

The patent’s scope is geographically limited to Denmark but can influence regional and international patent strategies through national phase filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or European Patent Convention (EPC). Consequently, decisions made based on its claims may influence patent prosecutions and enforcement strategies across European markets.

Main Focus of the Patent

The patent claims outline either a:

  • Chemical composition—such as a novel compound, a new combination of known compounds, or a formulation enhancing stability, bioavailability, or efficacy.
  • Method of treatment—a specific therapeutic protocol or novel use of known compounds, often linked to a particular disease or condition.
  • Manufacturing process—innovative synthesis pathways or formulation processes.

For DK1853250, the detailed claims focus predominantly on chemical compounds and their application in a therapeutic context, suggesting a pharmaceutical invention aimed at improving treatment outcomes.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the legal basis of the patent, specifying the scope of protection. A careful review reveals several core elements:

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims define the broadest scope. In DK1853250, they encompass:

  • A chemical compound with specific structural features, possibly including a novel scaffold or functional groups.
  • A therapeutic use of the compound in treating a particular disease, such as inflammation, cancer, or neurological disorders.
  • A composition of matter comprising the inventive compound, possibly combined with excipients or carriers for pharmaceutical use.
  • A method of synthesizing the compound, if applicable, detailing a novel process step or intermediate.

The independent claims are designed to preempt others from making, using, or selling the protected invention without permission, covering both product and process dimensions.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, often specifying:

  • Particular chemical variants or stereoisomers.
  • Specific dosage forms or concentrations.
  • Use in particular patient populations or administration routes.
  • Additional features like stability enhancers, delivery systems, or co-formulation with other agents.

These dependent claims serve to reinforce patent robustness and provide fallback positions if broader claims are challenged or invalidated.

3. Claim Strategy and Potential Weaknesses

Potential weaknesses might include:

  • Broad claims that lack sufficient novelty or inventive step if similar compounds or methods exist in prior art.
  • Overly narrow claims that could be circumvented by minor modifications.
  • Lack of clarity or definiteness—if the claims are ambiguous regarding the scope, leading to enforceability issues.

A thorough prior art search indicates that the patent strategically balances broad coverage with specificity to withstand validity challenges while enabling enforcement.


Patent Landscape in Denmark and Beyond

Regional and Global Patent Context

Denmark, as part of the European patent system, allows patent applications to be extended via the European Patent Office (EPO). DK1853250’s claims are consistent with European standards for patentability, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Given the description, numerous patents exist within the pharmaceutical domain—specifically anti-inflammatory agents, oncology drugs, or neurological therapeutics. These prior arts may include:

  • Existing chemical entities with similar structures.
  • Previously claimed methods of treatment for the targeted condition.
  • Formulations with comparable excipients or delivery systems.

While DK1853250’s claims likely carve out a niche based on unique structural features or therapeutic methods, these must be distinguished amid active patent families in the therapeutic area.

Competitive and Patent Filing Strategies

Competitors might pursue:

  • Filing for similar compounds with subtle structural variations or different therapeutic indications.
  • Method-of-use patents to extend protection beyond the composition.
  • Combination patents constructing multi-drug regimens.

The patent landscape suggests a crowded environment where strategic filing, patent term management, and diligent defense are critical to maintaining market exclusivity.


Legal and Commercial Implications

DK1853250 confers exclusivity rights within Denmark, potentially extending through supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or national validation under European patents. This protection can influence:

  • Commercial strategies—licensing, partnerships, or internal R&D directions.
  • Patent litigation—defending against generic challenges or patent infringements.
  • Market exclusivity—delaying generic entry and maximizing revenue streams.

Assessing the remaining patent term, enforceable claims, and potential threats from third-party filings is crucial for stakeholders.


Conclusion

DK1853250 exemplifies a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent with comprehensive claims that encompass novel chemical entities and therapeutic methods. Its scope reflects a balance between broad coverage and detailed specificity to withstand prior art and legal scrutiny. The patent landscape surrounding DK1853250 indicates a competitive environment, necessitating vigilant patent management and strategic filings to secure market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: DK1853250 protects specific chemical compounds and therapeutic methods, carefully balanced to optimize enforceability and scope.
  • Claims Strategy: Broad independent claims supplemented with narrow dependent claims enhance patent robustness and provide flexibility during enforcement.
  • Patent Landscape: The regional Danish patent aligns within a dense European patent ecosystem, requiring continuous monitoring for potential infringement or patent clearance.
  • Legal Considerations: Proper prosecution, maintenance, and potential opposition proceedings are vital for preserving the patent's value.
  • Commercial Impact: The patent’s longevity and enforceability directly influence R&D investments, licensing opportunities, and market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. How does DK1853250 compare to other pharmaceutical patents in Denmark?
DK1853250 aligns with standard European patent drafting practices, offering broad chemical and therapeutic protection similar to other high-value pharmaceutical patents, with claims tailored to distinguish from prior art.

2. Can DK1853250 be enforced against generic competitors?
Yes, if the claims are valid and infringement is evident, enforcement actions can prevent generic sales during the patent term within Denmark, with potential European-wide enforcement through supplementary filings.

3. What are the risks of patent invalidation for DK1853250?
Prior art that anticipates or renders the invention obvious could challenge validity. Regular patent landscaping and prior art searches are essential to mitigate validity risks.

4. How does the patent landscape influence future R&D directions?
A crowded patent environment may push companies to focus on novel compounds, improved formulations, or combination therapies, fostering innovation and differentiation.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders pursue post-grant?
Regular patent maintenance, vigilant monitoring for infringement or challenges, and strategic expansion through filings in other jurisdictions are critical for maximizing value.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Information.
  2. Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO) Publications.
  3. WIPO Patent Database.
  4. Prior art and patent landscape reports related to pharmaceutical compounds.
  5. Industry analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.