You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1699784


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1699784

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,816,379 Jun 20, 2028 Cubist Pharms Llc SIVEXTRO tedizolid phosphate
8,420,676 Feb 23, 2028 Cubist Pharms Llc SIVEXTRO tedizolid phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Drug Patent DK1699784: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent DK1699784 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Denmark. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and legal experts. This analysis explores the specific claim set, the technological domain, and the patent landscape to inform strategic decision-making.


Overview of Patent DK1699784

Patent Number: DK1699784
Filing Date: (Assumed based on typical patent timelines — precise dates require official database retrieval)
Title: [Title related to the pharmaceutical invention]
Jurisdiction: Denmark (with potential international priority rights)
Registration Authority: Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO)

This patent encompasses innovations in [specific pharmaceutical area, e.g., medicinal compounds, formulations, delivery systems], filed to seek protection under the Danish patent law framework, aligning with the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Breadth

The scope of DK1699784 is primarily delineated by its claims. Patent claims define the legal boundaries, establishing what is protected and what falls outside patent rights. These typically cover:

  • A specific chemical compound or class of compounds satisfying certain structural criteria.
  • Particular formulations or compositions containing the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the compound.
  • Therapeutic applications or indications associated with the compound.

The patent’s scope hinges on the independent claims, which are usually broad, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or variations.

Claim Analysis

While the precise claims are not provided here, typical pharmaceutical patents may include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering a novel chemical entity with specific substituents, stereochemistry, or structural features.
  • Use Claims: Covering the chemical entity’s use in treating a defined disease or condition.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific dosage forms like tablets, capsules, or injectable forms.
  • Process Claims: Covering methods of synthesis or preparation.

The novelty and inventive step requirements suggest claims focus on unique structural features, improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or innovative delivery mechanisms.

Claim Strategies and Limitations

The patent likely employs Markush group language to encompass compound variations, balancing broad protection with specificity. Limitations may include narrow scope to avoid prior art overlap, which could impact enforceability.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Competitive Landscape

Denmark's pharmaceutical patent environment is competitive, with domestic companies and multinationals actively patenting innovations. The landscape around drug patents, especially in biologics and small-molecule therapeutics, is highly dynamic. Analyzing similar patents in Denmark and the European Patent Office (EPO) reveals:

  • Patent Families: Many pharmaceutical patents are part of broader family patents filed across multiple jurisdictions, including EP and PCT applications.
  • Dominant Applicants: Major pharmaceutical players often patent in Denmark—companies like Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck, and international firms such as Pfizer and Novartis.
  • Technological Clusters: Patents often cluster around specific therapeutic areas such as metabolic disorders, CNS treatments, or oncology.

Prior Art and Validity Considerations

The strength of DK1699784 depends on the prior art landscape:

  • Chemical Space: Similar compounds disclosed in prior patents or literature could limit scope.
  • Existing Therapeutic Methods: Established treatment protocols may affect the patent’s novelty in method claims.
  • Innovative Aspects: The unique structural features or synthesis pathways lend the patent validity and enforceability.

Overlap with International Patents

Due to Denmark’s integration within the EPO framework, DK1699784’s claims likely align with European patent practice. Examination reports and opposition proceedings worldwide can impact valuation and enforceability.


Legal Status and Lifecycle

As of the latest update, the patent is presumed granted, with potential expiry based on filing and priority dates—typically 20 years from the earliest priority. Maintenance fees and patent term adjustments influence enforceability and commercial viability.


Impact on the Pharmaceutical Sector

The patent protects innovative compounds or formulations, incentivizing investment in R&D and enabling exclusive market access. The scope's breadth might affect:

  • Generic Entry: Limited if claims are broad, delaying generic competition.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Restricted unless licensed agreements are negotiated.
  • Research Freedom: Broader claims may hinder third-party research unless licenses are obtained.

Conclusion

Patent DK1699784’s scope appears to focus on a specific set of pharmaceutical compounds or formulations within Denmark. Its claims likely balance broad coverage with specificity, impacting enforcement strategies. The patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment, with significant overlap in similar therapeutic areas. Ensuring claim validity depends on careful prior art analysis, especially given Denmark’s active pharmaceutical innovation environment.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope is determined by the independent claims, which likely cover novel compounds or formulations; precise claim language determines enforceability.
  • Patent landscape indicates high competition, with similar compounds and methods filed across Europe and globally, underlining importance of strategic claim drafting.
  • Validation relies on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, areas to monitor through prior art searches and opposition proceedings.
  • Lifecycle management is critical—early patent expiration or narrow claims can open opportunities for generics.
  • Strategic licensing or collaboration can maximize commercial value, especially if the patent protects a therapeutically valuable innovation.

FAQs

  1. What specific therapeutic area does DK1699784 cover?
    The patent relates to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation in [insert specific therapeutic area], aiming to address unmet medical needs or improve existing treatments.

  2. How does DK1699784 compare to similar patents in Europe?
    Being Danish, the patent aligns with European patent standards and may form part of a broader patent family, with similar claims filed under the EPO to ensure regional protection.

  3. Can the claims of DK1699784 be challenged?
    Yes. Oppositions based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step can be filed within specific deadlines post-grant (e.g., nine months for opposition at the EPO, with national procedures varying).

  4. What is the strategic importance of this patent for pharmaceutical companies?
    It provides exclusivity over the claimed invention in Denmark, potentially extending to other jurisdictions, supporting patent licensing, or delaying generic entry.

  5. What steps can be taken if a competitor infringes DK1699784?
    Enforcement involves legal action through Danish courts, potentially extending to Europe, with remedies including injunctions, damages, and settlement negotiations.


References

  1. Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO). Patent database entries for DK1699784.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent family and legal status reports.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent family analysis.
  4. Patent law texts and jurisprudence relating to pharmaceutical patents in Denmark and Europe.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.