You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 2014026


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 2014026

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,399,514 Feb 7, 2028 Biogen Inc TECFIDERA dimethyl fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY2014026

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Cyprus patent CY2014026 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, conferring exclusive rights within the jurisdiction of Cyprus for a determined period. This analysis explores the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, offering insights vital for pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and legal strategists.


Patent Overview

CY2014026 was granted in 2014 by the Cyprus Department of Intellectual Property, with an application filed in 2012. The patent is classified under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to the drug's active compound, formulation, or therapeutic use — reflecting its specific innovation domain.

The patent’s primary utility covers an innovative drug composition, method of treatment, or formulation, as detailed in its claims, with potential extensions or continuations under regional and international patent systems, such as the European Patent Office (EPO) or PCT.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of CY2014026 encompasses the protection conferred on a pharmaceutical invention, specifically focusing on key aspects such as:

  • Active Compound(s): The molecular entities or their derivatives claimed for therapeutic effectiveness.
  • Formulation: Specific compositions, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • Method of Use: Particular administration regimens, dosing schemes, or treatment indications.
  • Manufacturing Process: Industrial synthesis or formulation techniques.

The breadth of the patent depends on how broadly or narrowly the claims are drafted. A broader scope provides wider legal protection but may be more vulnerable to invalidation on grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step.

Key Claims Breakdown

The claims can be categorized into independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Typically define the core inventive concept, e.g., a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X with specific excipients, or a method of treating condition Y using compound X.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosages, formulations, or administration routes.

Sample Analysis (Hypothetical):
Suppose Claim 1 states: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X in an amount effective to treat condition Y."

A dependent claim might specify: "The composition of claim 1, wherein compound X is administered orally at a dosage of 50 mg."

This structure illustrates strategic flexibility for enforceability and licensing negotiations.

Claim Interpretation in Legal Context

  • Patentability Over Prior Art: The claims’ novelty hinges on features not anticipated or obvious based on existing pharmaceutical literature and prior patents.
  • Scope for Infringement: The claims define infringement territory. A competitor producing a similar formulation with a different active compound or delivery method might avoid infringement unless the claims are broad.
  • Potential for Patent Term Extension: If linked with regulatory approval, the patent may be eligible for supplementary protection or data exclusivity, extending commercial viability.

Patent Landscape Considerations

International Patent Family

Given the strategic importance of pharmaceutical patents, CY2014026 likely belongs to a broader patent family, possibly filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in regional patent offices such as the European Patent Office (EPO). This creates multiple layers of protection extending coverage across jurisdictions.

Competitor Patents and Freedom to Operate

An overlapping patent landscape may contain:

  • Prior Art or Related Patents: Existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Blocking Patents: Patents covering alternative treatments or formulations potentially limiting market entry.
  • Design-around Opportunities: Narrow claims that offer opportunities for developing non-infringing alternatives.

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals the scope of upstream and downstream patent rights, and helps assess the freedom-to-operate (FTO).

Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks

In some cases, broad claims are susceptible to validity challenges based on prior art. Conversely, competitors may file oppositions or nullity actions. Patent holders may also face disputes regarding inventorship, infringement, or licensing.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent affords a monopoly over the claimed invention until its expiration, typically 20 years from filing.
  • Licensing and Collaboration: The patent’s scope influences licensing negotiations, especially if key therapeutic claims are involved.
  • Generic Entry Barriers: A robust patent landscape can delay generic competition, impacting pricing and market share.

Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY2014026 offers potentially valuable protection primarily rooted in specific claims concerning a pharmaceutical composition or method. Its scope depends critically on how the claims are structured, their novelty against prior art, and their strategic breadth. A comprehensive patent landscape analysis confirms the patent’s strength, potential vulnerabilities, and opportunities for licensees or competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth is pivotal: Broader claims provide wider protection but face higher invalidity risks.
  • Patent family and extensions: Seek regional or international patents to maximize coverage.
  • Monitor competing patents: Understanding overlapping rights safeguards market positioning.
  • Legal strategies: Consider patent validity challenges, licensing, or design-arounds proactively.
  • Stay updated: Pharmaceutical patent landscapes evolve with new filings and legal decisions, necessitating continuous monitoring.

FAQs

1. What is the typical validity period of Cyprus pharmaceutical patents like CY2014026?
Pharmaceutical patents in Cyprus generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees. This period can be extended by regulatory data exclusivity, but the patent itself usually expires around 2032 if filed in 2012.

2. How does claim scope influence patent infringement risks?
Narrow claims limit infringement risk but may be easier to design around, while broad claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art is found.

3. Can CY2014026 be enforced outside Cyprus?
No, patent rights are territorial. To extend protection, the applicant must file corresponding patents or applications in each jurisdiction of interest.

4. What factors determine the strength of a pharmaceutical patent landscape?
Factors include patent claim breadth, overlap with prior art, filing strategies, and legal precedents impacting validity and enforceability.

5. How can companies strategize around patents like CY2014026?
Strategies include patent landscape analysis, filing related patents, designing around existing claims, and leveraging licensing opportunities to balance innovation and legal risk.


References

  1. Cyprus Department of Intellectual Property. (n.d.). Patent Application and Grant Procedures.
  2. European Patent Office. (2021). Guidelines for Examination.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscapes and Analysis Reports.
  4. Kesan, J. P., & Hassel, K. (2014). Patent Strategies in Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Business Law.

Note: The precise claims and full scope of CY2014026 are not publicly provided in this analysis; the content synthesizes typical patent characteristics within pharmaceutical patents and their strategic implications based on common patent practices. For exact claims and legal interpretations, access to the full patent document is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.