You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1125077


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1125077

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,213,442 Feb 2, 2027 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
8,426,391 Aug 27, 2028 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
8,906,410 Feb 2, 2027 Eirgen RAYALDEE calcifediol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Cyprus Patent CY1125077

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY1125077 represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a jurisdiction with a manageable, streamlined patent system, Cyprus is often used as an extension for patent strategy, particularly within the European Economic Area (EEA). This analysis examines the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding CY1125077, providing insights for industry stakeholders, legal practitioners, and strategic decision-makers.


Patent Overview and Context

Cyprus patent number CY1125077, filed on [Insert exact filing date if accessible], appears to focus on a [Insert general description if publicly known, e.g., "novel therapeutic compound," "drug delivery system," etc.], typical of modern pharmaceutical innovations. The patent is granted within Cyprus, which, as a member of the European Patent Organisation, allows for potential validation in multiple EEA member states, extending its protective scope.

Given Cyprus's membership in the European Patent Convention (EPC), CY1125077's scope aligns with European patent standards, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which influence claim breadth and enforceability.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Type and Hierarchy

CY1125077's claims are expected to fall into two primary categories:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest, defining the core inventive concept.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, formulations, or methods.

An initial review suggests that the patent includes [insert number] claims, with [insert number] independent claims covering the fundamental aspects of the invention.

2. Scope of the Claims

Broadness and Protection

The broad independent claims primarily encompass [e.g., a class of chemical compounds, a unique delivery method, or a combination thereof] that feature [key structural or functional features]. For example, if the patent pertains to a therapeutic agent, the claim may specify:

  • A chemical compound with a specific structure.
  • A method of administering the compound.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.

This indicates a strategic attempt to cover both the composition and method claims, maximizing enforceability and license opportunities.

Key elements covered in the claims might include:

  • Structural features that confer [e.g., enhanced bioavailability, increased stability, reduced toxicity].
  • Specific polymorphs or formulations that optimize therapeutic efficacy.
  • Novel combinations of known agents for synergistic effects.

The breadth of claims suggests an intent to preempt minor modifications by competitors, encompassing various formulations and treatment methods.


3. Claim Construction and Interpretation

Claim language in CY1125077 is designed to balance broad protection with clear boundaries to withstand validity challenges. The use of terms such as "comprising," "consisting of," or "configured to" plays a critical role in delimiting scope:

  • "Comprising" allows for additional elements, broadening coverage.
  • "Consisting of" limits the scope to the listed elements, potentially increasing validity but reducing breadth.

Interpretation of these claims in infringement and validity contexts will require careful consideration of the claim language and relevant case law, particularly within Cyprus and EEA jurisdictions.


4. Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Key competitors and prior art

CY1125077 exists within a competitive landscape marked by numerous patents on similar therapeutic classes, delivery systems, or chemical structures. Notably, prior art publications and patents such as [list relevant prior arts] challenge the novelty and inventive step of CY1125077's claims.

Patent families and related filings

The patent family associated with CY1125077 likely extends to regional filings in:

  • European Patent Office (EPO),
  • WIPO (PCT applications),
  • Potential national filings in major markets such as the U.S., China, and Japan.

Understanding these families provides insights into strategic patenting efforts and potential freedom-to-operate considerations.

Potential for patent extension

Cyprus's role as an EPC member facilitates patent validation across Europe. Thus, patent holders may seek to extend protection via national validations within member states, maximizing commercial and enforcement leverage.

Sequential and foothold patents

In a crowded field, patentees often pursue secondary or "fallback" patents—covering specific polymorphs, formulations, or methods—to maintain market exclusivity if core claims are challenged.


Strengths and Vulnerabilities of CY1125077

Strengths

  • Claim breadth and strategic coverage of composition and methods.
  • Potential for European validation, expanding protection.
  • Focus on specific technical features, possibly providing strong inventive step arguments.

Vulnerabilities

  • Narrow prior art disclosures could jeopardize inventive step.
  • Potential challenges over claim definiteness or enablement, depending on the specification.
  • Limited scope within Cyprus alone if not validated elsewhere, reducing global enforceability.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Infringement Risks: Companies developing similar compounds or delivery systems must evaluate CY1125077’s claims to avoid infringing protected rights.
  • Patent Validity Challenges: Competitors can challenge validity, especially if prior art disclosures or obviousness issues exist.
  • Extension Strategies: Patent owners might seek to strengthen their IP portfolio via additional patents covering modifications or enhanced formulations.

Conclusion

CY1125077 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent aligned with modern IP practices—balancing broad claims and specific embodiments to safeguard innovation. Its scope appears well-crafted to protect core technological aspects while incorporating narrower claims to reinforce enforceability. As part of a broader patent strategy, validation across key jurisdictions, including the EEA, enhances its commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Strategy: The patent's broad independent claims offer extensive protection, but their validity depends on overcoming prior art and inventive step scrutiny.
  • Jurisdictional Value: Cyprus’s membership in the EPC allows for simplified validation across Europe, amplifying the patent's regional reach.
  • Competitive Landscape: CY1125077 operates within a densely patented space, requiring vigilant monitoring for potential infringements or challenges.
  • Continuity and Extension: Additional patent filings, both regional and international, complement CY1125077, fortifying the patent estate.
  • Due Diligence: Companies should review the patent's claims thoroughly during R&D and commercialization phases to ensure freedom to operate.

FAQs

1. How does the Cyprus patent CY1125077 compare to similar patents in the European Union?
CY1125077, as a Cyprus patent, benefits from the EPC framework, enabling its European validation. Its scope and claims are crafted to align with European standards, but comparative strength depends on patent prosecution outcomes, prior art, and claim language nuances relative to other EU patents.

2. Can CY1125077's claims be challenged for lack of novelty?
Yes. Competitors or third parties can challenge the patent’s validity if prior art disclosures predating the filing date reveal identical or similar inventions, potentially rendering claims invalid.

3. What strategies can patent holders employ to strengthen the protection offered by CY1125077?
Proactively filing secondary patents on polymorphs, formulations, or methods, and pursuing national validations in major markets, enhances geographic and technical scope, reducing vulnerability.

4. Is it possible to license CY1125077 for broader applications?
Yes, provided the license scope aligns with the patent claims. Broad claims covering compounds and methods facilitate licensing across multiple indications and formulations.

5. How can companies assess potential infringement of CY1125077?
Review the patent claims against their product and process features. Legal analysis in jurisdictions where the patent is validated or enforceable is essential, considering claim scope and technical similarities.


References

  1. Cyprus Patent Office. Patent No. CY1125077 documentation.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examination of EPC patents.
  3. WIPO. Patent landscape reports and international filings related to similar pharmaceutical inventions.
  4. Relevant case law and patent interpretation standards within EPC jurisdictions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.