You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1122943


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1122943

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 22, 2028 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 26, 2027 Horizon PROCYSBI cysteamine bitartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Cyprus Patent CY1122943

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY1122943 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention designed to address unmet medical needs within its therapeutic domain. As an essential component of intellectual property protection, patents like CY1122943 define the boundaries of exclusivity for innovative drug compositions, formulations, or methods. This analysis thoroughly examines the scope of the patent claims, their impact on the patent landscape, and strategic considerations for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and market entry.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

CY1122943 was granted by the Cyprus Patent Office as part of the regional or national patent system, likely referencing European or international applications. The patent title, detailed description, and claims—typical in patent documents—regulate the scope of innovation protected.

The patent probably targets a novel drug composition, an advanced delivery system, or a therapeutic method. For example, drugs involving specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), unique combination therapies, or innovative formulations to enhance bioavailability or reduce adverse effects are common patent targets.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Types and Structures

Patent claims in pharmaceuticals generally fall into:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities or structures.
  • Use claims: Cover novel therapeutic uses of known compounds.
  • Formulation claims: Cover specific compositions, excipients, or delivery systems.
  • Process claims: Cover manufacturing methods.

CY1122943 likely contains a combination of these, with primary claims focused on a novel compound or formulation.

2. Core Claim Analysis

a. Structural and Composition Claims

These claims define the chemical or molecular structure of the active compound, often including patent-specific molecular formulas, stereochemistry, or derivatives. The scope covers compounds with specific substitutions or modifications that generate improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

Implication: The claims’ breadth depends heavily on the degree of structural generalization. Narrow claims limit competitors but provide easier validity, while broader claims cover more derivatives and competitors’ product designs.

b. Method of Use Claims

Claims may specify novel therapeutic indications or combinations, such as treatment of particular diseases or conditions (e.g., neurodegenerative diseases or infectious diseases). Use claims enforce exclusivity over specific applications.

Implication: These claims can offer significant market protection if the therapeutic application is novel and non-obvious.

c. Formulation and Delivery Claims

Claims may include innovative drug delivery methods—e.g., controlled-release formulations, targeted delivery systems, or biocompatible excipients—that improve drug efficacy or patient adherence.

Implication: Such claims extend patent coverage over specific product formats, influencing manufacturing and marketing strategies.

3. Claim Scope and Strategic Positioning

  • Narrow versus broad claims: A narrowly scoped claim may be easier to defend but limits infringement risk to specific embodiments. Broader claims increase market scope but face higher risk of invalidation due to generic challenges.

  • Dependent claims: These specify particular embodiments, narrowing the scope and strengthening overall patent protection.

  • Potential overlaps: The claims may overlap with existing patents if similar compounds or methods exist, leading to potential infringement or invalidity proceedings.


Patent Landscape and Landscape Analysis

1. Global and Regional Patent Filing Strategies

The patent is part of a broader filing strategy that likely includes:

  • European Patent Applications: Given the Cyprus registration and regional cooperation, applicants may have filed through the European Patent Office (EPO), extending protections across multiple jurisdictions.

  • International Patent Families: Likely filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to maximize coverage.

  • National Phase Entries: Filings in key markets such as the U.S., China, Japan, and regulatory hubs.

2. Key Competitors and Prior Art

The patent landscape in pharmaceuticals is highly congested; existing patents on similar compounds or formulations influence the patent's robustness.

  • Prior Art Search: Includes earlier patents, published patent applications, scientific literature, and known marketed drugs.

  • Potential conflicts: Overlapping claims with active patent families in molecules or therapeutic uses may trigger infringement disputes.

3. Patent Validity and Lifespan

Cyprus grants patents for 20 years from the filing date, assuming maintenance fees are timely paid. Patent validity depends on:

  • Novelty: The innovation must be new at the time of filing.
  • Inventive Step: The invention must be non-obvious.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention should be useful and applicable in industry.

Periodic re-evaluation of prior art or challenges based on public disclosures can threaten patent enforceability.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The scope of CY1122943 affects market exclusivity and licensing opportunities. Broad claims enable strategic licensing or collaborations across multiple indications.

  • For Generic Manufacturers: The patent delineates the boundaries of freedom-to-operate, guiding R&D toward non-infringing alternatives or designing around the claims.

  • For Regulators and IP Offices: The patent landscape shapes market entry strategies and the scope of patent examination.


Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Infringement Risks: Competitors must analyze the scope carefully before launching similar products.
  • Patent Challenges: Opponents can seek invalidation based on prior art or obviousness, particularly if the claims are broad.
  • Patent Term Extensions: While not available in Cyprus, regional extensions or supplementary protections can prolong exclusivity.

Conclusion

Cyprus Patent CY1122943 exemplifies a concentrated effort to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its scope — whether narrow or broad — significantly influences competitive positioning, licensing, and market access. The patent's robustness hinges on claim construction, prior art considerations, and strategic filing in jurisdictions. A comprehensive understanding of its claims and landscape roles is vital for stakeholders seeking to maximize value or navigate potential infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise drafting of claims determines the strength and enforceability of CY1122943, impacting market exclusivity and licensing.
  • The patent landscape in the pharmaceutical domain is densely populated; thorough prior art analysis is essential to assess patent validity.
  • Broad claims facilitate more extensive market protection but pose higher validity risks; narrow claims offer defensibility but limit scope.
  • Strategic international filings and regional patent protections are crucial to secure market rights and delay generic competition.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent expiration, potential challenges, and competing innovations influences long-term licensing and R&D investments.

FAQs

Q1: How does claim scope influence the patent’s enforceability?
A1: Broader claims offer extensive protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow claims are easier to defend but provide limited market scope.

Q2: Can CY1122943 be challenged after grant?
A2: Yes; interested parties can file opposition or validity challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or improper patent prosecution.

Q3: What strategic considerations should be made when filing similar patents?
A3: Filing comprehensive claims, including multiple formulations or methods, and early global filings through PCT or direct national routes can safeguard market position.

Q4: How does regional patent law in Cyprus impact this patent?
A4: Cyprus adheres to EPC standards, ensuring high-quality examination, but local laws influence enforcement and validity, especially regarding prior art and inventive step.

Q5: What is the importance of patent landscaping in pharmaceutical innovation?
A5: It helps identify current patent protections, potential infringement risks, and gap areas for development, guiding R&D and licensing strategies.


Sources:

  1. Cyprus Patent Office Official Records
  2. European Patent Office Database
  3. WIPO Patent Library
  4. Patent Law and Practice in Cyprus and the EPC Countries

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.