You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1121459


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1121459

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 28, 2034 Cubist Pharms Llc DIFICID fidaxomicin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1121459

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent CY1121459, registered in Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention—specifically, a drug or formulation intended for therapeutic use. As a strategic intellectual property asset, this patent's scope and claims determine the exclusivity, market penetration, and competitive edge of the protected pharmaceutical invention. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent's scope, the breadth of its claims, and its position within the current patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Legal Status

Patent Number: CY1121459
Application Year: [Insert Year—specific year unavailable in provided prompt]
Filing Authority: Cyprus Patent Office
Patent Status: [Active/Expired/ pending—assuming active for the scope of this analysis]

This patent protects a drug or pharmaceutical formulation, with its claims defining the scope of legal protection. It covers a unique chemical composition, formulation, method of use, or manufacturing process—details vital for understanding the extent of exclusive rights.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent delineates the boundaries within which the patent holder has exclusive rights. For pharmaceutical patents, this typically includes chemical composition, formulation, methods of treatment, and manufacturing processes.

Core Elements of Scope:

  • Chemical Composition or Compound:
    Patent CY1121459 likely claims a specific chemical entity, its derivatives, or salts with therapeutic activity. The scope probably emphasizes novel pharmacophores not described in prior art, providing broad coverage over the claimed chemical class.

  • Formulation Claims:
    If the patent claims specific formulations—such as sustained-release forms, co-crystals, or combination therapies—they expand the scope to cover various dosage forms.

  • Method of Use:
    Therapeutic applications, such as treatment of particular diseases or disorders, can be claimed separately, enabling the patent to cover the process of treatment with the compound.

  • Manufacturing Process:
    Claims may extend to unique synthetic routes or methods of preparation, protecting proprietary production technologies.

Implication of Scope: The breadth of the claims directly influences market exclusivity. Narrow claims focus narrowly on a compound or use, whereas broad claims can inhibit competitors from developing similar drugs within a wide chemical or therapeutic class.


Claims Analysis

The patent likely comprises multiple claims, categorized as independent and dependent.

1. Independent Claims:
These establish the core patent protection, covering:

  • A novel chemical compound with specific structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • A method of treating a disease using the compound.

2. Dependent Claims:
These specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific salts or esters of the compound.
  • Particular dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules).
  • Use in treating certain indications, such as cancer, inflammatory disease, or neurological disorder.

Claims Breadth and Strategy:

  • Broad Claims: To maximize protection, the patent may declare broad chemical classes or therapeutic applications.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused claims redirect to specific compounds or formulations, potentially leading to easier validity and enforcement.

Potential Weaknesses:

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art invalidates the scope.
  • Narrow claims limit exclusivity but are easier to defend.

Patent Landscape for Cypriot Drug Patents

Assessing patent landscape involves understanding the patent environment surrounding the invention—specifically:

1. Prior Art and Existing Patents:
Cyprus’s patent system references European Patent Office (EPO) and international (PCT) filings, with access to a substantial database. Similar drugs or compounds might be patented in the European or global context, affecting the novelty or inventive step.

2. Regional and International Patent Strategies:
Given Cyprus’s membership in the European Patent Convention (EPC), applicants often file European patents designating Cyprus. Consequently, the patent landscape overlaps with EU and global pharmaceutical patents.

3. Competitive Patent Filings:
Other jurisdictions may host patents with overlapping claims—such as EP (Europe), US, and PCT applications covering similar compounds or uses. Analyzing these can reveal potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate insights.

4. Patent Term and Data Exclusivity:
In the EU, pharmaceutical patents generally have a 20-year term from filing date, supplemented with supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for additional protection periods. This landscape affects market strategy and lifecycle planning.

5. Litigation and Enforcement:
Current legal proceedings or opposition filings within Cyprus or EU courts could impact the patent's enforceability. While Cyprus’s patent system is harmonized with EPC standards, localized legal nuances may influence enforcement strategies.


Key Patent Citations and Similarities

Comparative analysis with similar patents reveals the degree of innovation and potential patent overlaps:

  • Chemical Class Similarities:
    If CY1121459 pertains to a specific chemical class, prior art patents within this class limit claim breadth. For example, patents protecting similar heterocyclic compounds or derivatives.

  • Use-Case Similarities:
    Claims covering therapeutic uses overlapping with existing patents could lead to licensing opportunities or infringement concerns.

  • Manufacturing and Formulation Patents:
    Prior art related to specific processes or formulations influences claim defensibility.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Innovative Edge:

  • A patent with broad, defensible claims can provide a competitive advantage, blocking generics and enabling premium pricing.
  • Narrow or invalidated claims diminish market exclusivity, increasing competition.

Patent Clusters and Freedom-to-Operate:

  • The existence of multiple patents around similar compounds requires careful freedom-to-operate analysis, especially when entering markets or developing generic versions.

Lifecycle and Extension Opportunities:

  • Supplementary protections like SPCs or patent term extensions could extend exclusivity, depending on jurisdictional allowances.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • For Patent Holders:
    Maintain and enforce patent CY1121459 aggressively, monitor overlaps with existing patents, and explore opportunities for extensions or supplementary protections to maximize lifecycle.

  • For Competitors:
    Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate assessments, analyze overlapping patents, and consider designing around claims by modifying chemical structures or therapeutic claims.

  • For Strategic Planning:
    Expand patent families into key jurisdictions, especially those with high market potential and patent enforcement strength, to safeguard global competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Breadth Defines Market Power:
    The scope of the claims in CY1121459 determines exclusivity. Broad claims covering novel chemical entities and uses offer strong protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges.

  • Landscape Complexity Requires Vigilance:
    The surrounding patent environment, especially in Europe and globally, affects the patent’s strength. Multijurisdictional patent strategy is essential.

  • Legal Vigilance and Enforcement Are Critical:
    Maintaining patent validity involves monitoring prior art and legal proceedings. Strategic enforcement sustains market position.

  • Lifecycle Management Is Essential:
    To maximize the patent’s commercial value, consider extensions, supplementary protections, and global patent filings.

  • Innovation Quality Matters:
    Linking patent claims to genuine, inventive pharmaceutical advances ensures strength against invalidity challenges and enhances licensing opportunities.


FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of the patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like CY1121459?
A: Claims define the scope of protection, determining what the patent covers. Their breadth influences exclusivity and enforcement potential, making claims the critical element of any patent assessment.

Q2: How does the patent landscape in Cyprus compare with other jurisdictions?
A: Cyprus aligns with EPC standards, meaning patent examination, scope, and enforcement are comparable to European countries. However, enforcement and legal nuances may vary, affecting patent strength and strategy.

Q3: Can existing patents in the same chemical class affect CY1121459’s enforceability?
A: Yes. Overlapping prior art can limit claim scope or invalidate existing patents, emphasizing the importance of thorough patent landscape analysis during patent prosecution and litigation.

Q4: What strategies can extend the patent's commercial lifecycle?
A: Filing for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), developing new formulations, or expanding claims to new uses or derivatives can prolong exclusivity.

Q5: Why is understanding the patent landscape crucial before entering the pharmaceutical market?
A: It helps assess infringement risks, identify opportunities for licensing, avoid legal disputes, and plan effective patent filing and enforcement strategies.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent landscape reports.
  2. Cyprus Patent Office. Patent laws and procedural guidelines.
  3. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd v. Genentech Inc. (Legal case exemplifying patent scope importance).
  4. European Patent Convention (EPC). Guidelines for patentability.
  5. WHO International Patent Publication Database. Potential global overlaps.

Note: Due to limited publicly available details about patent CY1121459, some assumptions have been made regarding its content. For precise analysis, access to its full patent specification, prosecution history, and regional patent databases is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.