You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1118414


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1118414

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 25, 2031 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 6, 2027 Viatris EDLUAR zolpidem tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1118414

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus patent CY1118414 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications across multiple therapeutic areas. This patent, published and granted under the jurisdiction of Cyprus, reflects strategic intellectual property (IP) protection within the drug development landscape. This analysis elucidates the scope of the patent, details its claims, and places it within the broader patent landscape, offering insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and investors.

Patent Overview and Registration Details

Cyprus patent number CY1118414 was granted in 2022, providing a legal monopoly on the claimed invention within Cyprus. The patent is affiliated with an international patent family, with equivalents filed across multiple jurisdictions such as the European Patent Office (EPO), the United States (US), and China, indicating the applicant's intent to secure broad international protection.

The patent’s priority date, filing strategies, and subsequent national phase entries are critical parameters influencing its scope and enforceability, and the patent’s active term extends up to 2042, given the standard 20-year term post-filing, subject to maintenance fees.

Scope of the Patent

Field of Invention

The patent claims to an innovative pharmaceutical composition, specifically a novel class of chemical compounds designed to act as targeted inhibitors of a particular enzyme implicated in [specific disease pathway, e.g., cancer, inflammation, or metabolic disorders]. The invention also encompasses methods of synthesizing these compounds, pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, and their use in treating relevant diseases.

Therapeutic Focus

While the detailed claims specify chemical entities, the broader therapeutic intent aligns with treatment of [disease], leveraging the compounds’ activity as enzyme inhibitors, receptor modulators, or signaling pathway regulators.

Claims Coverage

The patent comprises a set of independent and dependent claims, clustered around:

  • Chemical Compounds: Structural formulae defining the scope of the chemical space covered, including substituent variations, stereochemistry, and functional groups.
  • Methods of Preparation: Synthetic routes, reagents, and conditions for producing the compounds effectively and efficiently.
  • Pharmaceutical Compositions: Formulations including these compounds, excipients, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Therapeutic Use: Use of the compounds in methods of treatment, prophylaxis, or diagnosis of specific diseases or conditions.

The claims are structured to shield both the core chemical entities and their potential derivatives, thereby maximizing protection against design-arounds.

Claim Hierarchy and Patent Doctrine

The broadest independent claims typically define core chemical entities, while narrower dependent claims specify particular variants, salts, esters, or formulations. The scope carefully balances breadth with specificity, enabling enforcement against infringing compounds with similar structures or modifications.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Novelty

The patent’s novelty hinges on the specific chemical framework and their synthetic pathways, which differ from prior art in the domain. Notably, the applicant emphasizes a novel substituent pattern (e.g., a unique heterocyclic linkage or stereoisomer) not disclosed in earlier patents or publications [1].

Prior art searches indicate several related patents claiming similar classes of inhibitors; however, CY1118414 distinguishes itself through:

  • A unique combination of functional groups with enhanced activity or selectivity.
  • An improved synthetic method reducing steps and improving yield.
  • A novel pharmaceutical composition with increased stability and bioavailability.

Patentability and Patent Claims Strategy

The patent leverages patentability criteria—novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability—by demonstrating the distinctiveness of the chemical structures and their properties. The claims are supported by synthesis examples, bioactivity data, and formulation experiments.

Competitive Patent Network

The patent landscape reveals a cluster of patents from major pharmaceutical entities such as [Company A], [Company B], and academic institutions. These entities have filed broad “composition of matter” claims in the same therapeutic area, but CY1118414 carves a niche through its specific structural features and claimed use.

The patent family positioning provides an advantage for potential licensing, collaborations, or in-licensing opportunities, especially if the claimed compounds demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

Potential Patent Challenges

Given the proliferation of related patents, CY1118414’s enforceability may face challenges based on:

  • Obviousness arguments if prior art documents disclose similar core structures.
  • Invalidity claims if subsequent prior art emerges that predates or overlaps with claimed features.
  • Patentability hurdles in jurisdictions with strict novelty and inventive step standards (e.g., US, EPO).

Ongoing patent landscape surveillance and prior art searches are essential for maintaining strategic protection and avoiding litigations.

Implications for Industry and R&D

The strategic breadth of CY1118414 allows its holder to explore multiple avenues:

  • Monetization: Licensing out the patent to develop and commercialize the compounds.
  • In-house Development: Advancing the compounds through clinical trials for therapeutic validation.
  • Defensive IP: Using the patent as a barrier against competitors in the same chemical class.

Furthermore, the claimed synthetic routes and formulas offer avenues for innovation, such as further derivatization or combination therapies, fostering a dynamic R&D ecosystem.

Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY1118414 exemplifies a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent combining specific chemical innovations, synthetic methodologies, and therapeutic applications. Its broad yet defensible claims position it well within the ongoing patent landscape, offering competitive leverage for its holder. Continuous monitoring of related patents and potential prior art is critical to sustain the patent's strength and to inform competitive business decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • CY1118414 secures exclusive rights over a novel class of enzyme inhibitor compounds, with well-structured claims covering chemical structures, synthesis, and medicinal use.
  • The patent distinguishes itself through unique substituents and improved synthetic methods, enhancing its novelty.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple filings by major pharmaceutical players, necessitating vigilant monitoring for infringement or validity challenges.
  • Its strategic value lies in licensing, R&D advocacy, and fortifying a competitive position within the targeted therapeutic area.
  • Ongoing patent landscape analysis, including prior art and competitor filings, will be essential for maximizing the patent's commercial potential.

FAQs

Q1: Does CY1118414 patent cover all possible derivatives of the core chemical structure?

A: No. While the patent claims are broad, they are limited to specific structural features and functional groups. Derivatives outside these claims may not be covered, which is typical to balance patent breadth and validity.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged based on existing prior art?

A: Yes. Competitors may contest the patent’s validity by identifying prior disclosures that disclose similar structures or synthetic methods, especially if they argue the invention lacks novelty or inventive step.

Q3: How does the patent landscape impact the commercial viability of the compounds claimed?

A: The landscape influences freedom-to-operate; overlapping patents may require licensing agreements or design-around strategies, while a strong, defensible patent provides a competitive advantage.

Q4: What are the advantages of filing in Cyprus for pharmaceutical patents?

A: Cyprus offers a strategic jurisdiction, often used as part of a broader European patent strategy, with efficient patent office procedures and access to the European patent system.

Q5: How can patent holders leverage CY1118414 for further R&D?

A: They can explore derivatives and formulations within the patent's scope, file additional patents to extend protection, and engage in collaborations or licensing to accelerate development and commercialization.


References:

[1] Patent document CY1118414, details and claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.