You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1118077


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1118077

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,682,633 Jun 19, 2027 Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride
7,682,634 Jun 19, 2027 Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride
8,158,156 Jun 19, 2027 Alpharma Pharms EMBEDA morphine sulfate; naltrexone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY1118077

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

The Cyprus patent CY1118077 represents a critical intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent encapsulates specific innovations, potentially impactful on medical treatment, drug formulation, or therapeutic methods. Understanding its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals aiming to navigate the competitive environment and assess freedom-to-operate or licensing potentials.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope and claims, contextualized within the broader patent landscape, emphasizing its strategic value.


Overview of Cyprus Patent CY1118077

CY1118077 was granted by the Cyprus Patent Office, likely following examination of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, in accordance with Cyprus’s patent laws aligned with international standards (notably, the EPC and PCT principles). Preliminary available data suggests the patent pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition, manufacturing process, or formulation—although exact claim content requires detailed review.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of CY1118077 is primarily dictated by its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent. Patent scope in pharmaceuticals generally ranges from broad claims—covering general classes of compounds or methods—to narrow claims targeting specific chemical entities, formulations, or manufacturing processes.

In the absence of the full patent document, standard analysis methods for similar patents suggest a likely focus area:

  • Chemical Compound or Composition: The patent may claim a novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or a unique formulation.
  • Method of Manufacture: The patent could encompass innovative synthesis or processing techniques.
  • Therapeutic Use: It may specify methods of treating particular diseases or conditions with the identified drug.

The scope’s breadth significantly influences patent value. Broad claims covering classes of compounds or methods offer extensive protection but are harder to validate for patentability; narrower claims provide more targeted rights but may be easier to design around.

Claims Structure

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, CY1118077 likely contains:

  • Independent Claims: Defining the core invention, possibly specifying a new chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or treatment method.
  • Dependent Claims: Detailing specific embodiments, preferred forms, dosages, or adjunct components.

An example independent claim may read:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient] in an amount effective to treat [disease], wherein the composition is formulated with [excipient], and administered via [route]."

Alternatively, if chemical novel, the claim might be:

"A compound of Formula I, wherein R1, R2, etc., are as defined, exhibiting activity against [target]."

Claim Clarity and Validity

For patent rights to be enforceable, claims must be clear and supported by the description. Critical evaluation indicates:

  • Novelty: The claims likely rely on prior art references; thus, the patent’s validity depends on overcoming novelty and inventive step barriers.
  • Inventive Step: Particularly for chemical compounds or formulations, the inventive effort must be clearly demonstrated.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claims should specify utility, aligning with patent law requirements.

Patent Landscape for Similar Pharmaceutical Patents

Global Context

Cyprus, as a member of the European Patent Convention, aligns its patent system with Europe. The landscape for pharmaceutical patents is characterized by:

  • High R&D investment in novel drugs.
  • Expanding patent families covering multiple jurisdictions.
  • Strategic use of patent claims to extend exclusivity via secondary patents—formulations, methods, or polymorphs.

Regional and International Patent Coverage

Similar patents are often filed in:

  • European Patent Office (EPO): Providing broader European coverage.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Under the PCT system for international protection.
  • U.S. Patent Office (USPTO): For access to the large U.S. market.

Because patents in different jurisdictions may vary in scope, patent landscape analyses include reviewing patent family memberships and claiming strategy.

Competitive Patent Landscape

The pharmaceutical patent environment around CY1118077 appears competitive:

  • Blocking patents: Existing patents may cover similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods.
  • Improvements and follow-up patents: Companies often file for formulations, methods of use, or delivery systems related to core patents, creating a dense patent thicket.
  • Legal challenges: Patent validity may be contested via oppositions or litigation, especially if the claims are broad.

Patentability and Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

  • Overlap with Prior Art: Patentability hinges on whether similar compounds or methods exist. A detailed prior art search should include databases such as Espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE, and USPTO.
  • Designing around patents: Narrowing claim scope or developing alternative formulations is a common strategy.
  • Licensing and partnerships: Companies may seek licensing agreements if the patent blocks entry into certain therapeutic areas.

Strategic Implications of CY1118077

  • Market exclusivity: If validated, the patent secures exclusive rights, delaying generic competition.
  • R&D investments: The scope indicates R&D focus; narrower claims demand innovation upstream and downstream.
  • Legal defenses: Clear, well-drafted claims bolster enforcement actions and defend against invalidation.

Key Takeaways

  • CY1118077's scope likely centers on a specific pharmaceutical composition, compound, or treatment method, with the claims defining the extent of protection. Precise claims shape enforceability and strategic value.
  • The patent landscape in this space is highly competitive, with dense filings at the regional and global levels to extend market exclusivity. Understanding overlaps with existing patents is crucial.
  • A comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis should be conducted, examining existing patents, prior art, and potential for claim modifications.
  • Broad claims offer strong protection but are vulnerable to validity challenges; narrow claims provide targeted rights but may be circumvented with minor modifications.
  • Stakeholders should monitor patent families related to CY1118077 to identify licensing opportunities or risks of infringement.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic area covered by Cyprus patent CY1118077?
While specific details of the patent are not publicly disclosed, such patents typically focus on novel pharmaceutical compounds or formulations for treating specific diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

2. How does the scope of claims impact patent enforcement?
Broader claims provide stronger legal protection but carry higher validity risks; narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited scope. Precise claim drafting balances enforceability against ease of circumventing.

3. Can similar patents diminish the value of CY1118077?
Yes. Overlapping patents or prior art can challenge the novelty or inventive step of CY1118077, impacting its enforceability and commercial value.

4. How do international patent filings affect the patent landscape for CY1118077?
Filing in multiple jurisdictions through the PCT or direct applications expands protection but also creates a complex landscape of competing patents, requiring strategic portfolio management.

5. What is the significance of patent landscaping in the pharmaceutical sector?
It aids stakeholders in identifying patenting trends, potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and R&D directions, thereby optimizing strategic planning.


References

  1. Cyprus Patent Office. Database of granted patents.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent applications.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent information resources.
  5. Bloomberg Industry Reports. Pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.