You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1115991


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1115991

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,617,698 Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
10,660,908 Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
10,682,364 Jun 10, 2031 Leo Pharma As ENSTILAR betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Cyprus Patent CY1115991

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent CY1115991, granted in Cyprus, offers significant insights into its technical scope, claim breadth, and position within the global patent landscape. As Cyprus is part of the European Patent Convention (EPC) system, patents granted here can influence broader European intellectual property strategies, especially in the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides a comprehensive perspective on these aspects, facilitating strategic decision-making for innovators, legal professionals, and industry stakeholders.

Overview of Patent CY1115991

Cyprus patent CY1115991 pertains to a specific drug-related invention. While the official patent document provides technical disclosure, the primary goal here is to dissect the claims, interpret their scope, and situate the patent within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.

Though detailed technical specifics require patent document access, typical pharmaceutical patents categorize into formulations, methods of use, active compounds, or combination therapies. Our focus encompasses these categories to understand the patent's protection scope and potential overlaps with established patent families.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Focus

The patent ostensibly covers a novel pharmacological compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. Based on standard pharmaceutical patent practice, it potentially involves:

  • An active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with a unique chemical structure or isomeric form,
  • A novel formulation enhancing stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery,
  • A method of treatment for specific indications (e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases).

The scope is primarily defined by the claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent protection.

Legal Boundaries in Scope

The scope is articulated through independent claims, often broad, covering the core inventive concept, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or embodiments with additional features. Effective patent scope balancing breadth for commercial leverage and specificity for enforceability determines the patent’s strategic value.

Implications for Patent Strategy

The scope delineates potential infringement scenarios and freedom-to-operate assessments. Broader claims may cover multiple compounds or methods, but risk narrower validity if prior art exists. Conversely, narrower claims may limit enforceability but improve validity prospects.

Analysis of Claims

Claim Structure

Patent claims are typically structured into:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific features, such as particular chemical variants, dosages, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic indications.

Without access to the full text, the standard analytical approach involves assuming the presence of these claim types.

Claim Categories

1. Compound Claims: If the patent claims a specific chemical entity, the scope hinges on its chemical structure, stereochemistry, and purity. Such claims are often supported by detailed synthesis methods and characterization data.

2. Composition Claims: Covering pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound, including excipients, stabilizers, or delivery systems.

3. Method Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing, administering, or treating with the compound.

4. Use Claims: Covering specific medical indications or therapeutic methods.

Claim Breadth and Potential Overlap

  • If the patent claims a novel chemical structure, its scope potentially encompasses all variants with similar core.Structural features could be covered explicitly or implicitly.
  • Use claims extending to treatment methods provide a strategic protective layer.
  • Composition claims safeguard specific formulations, which can be vital in preventing competitors from producing similar dosage forms.

Claim Language Strategy and Patent Validity

Strong claim language includes:

  • Precise chemical definitions,
  • Clear boundaries on chemical modifications,
  • Limitations on therapeutic uses,
  • Sufficient support in the description.

Ambiguous or overly broad claims risk invalidation through prior art invalidity challenges, especially if generic similar compounds exist.

Patent Landscape for Cypriot Patent CY1115991

Geographical Coverage and Strategic Significance

While Cyprus is a member of the EPC, its patent system offers a strategic point for extending protection into Europe. The patent's local validity is limited geographically; however, its significance lies in:

  • Potential for European Patent Validation: The applicant may have or may intend to pursue validation in key European markets via the European Patent Office (EPO), leveraging Cyprus as an early filing jurisdiction.

  • Bridging to Global Protection: The patent can serve as a priority document for subsequent filings in other jurisdictions, following the Paris Convention rules.

Related Patent Families and Patent Maps

An effective patent landscape requires identifying:

  • Priority Family Members: Related patents filed earlier or in other jurisdictions, providing insight into linearly or co-pending innovations.
  • Citations and Patent Overlaps: Citations to prior art establish novelty and inventive step status. Overlaps with existing patents highlight potential overlap or infringement risks.
  • Competitive Landscape: Version of patent landscape maps indicates whether similar compounds or methods are protected elsewhere or in development.

Commonly, pharmaceutical patents are part of extensive families patenting:

  • The core compound,
  • Various salt or stereoisomer forms,
  • Formulations with different excipients,
  • Use in different indications.

Legal and Market Implications

  • The patent's enforceability depends on prior art and claim validity.
  • Its scope influences licensing strategies, collaborations, or patent challenges.
  • The patent can impact generic entry and market exclusivity periods.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Overcoming prior art that may undermine broad claims, navigating competing patents with overlapping claims, or invalidity due to insufficient inventive step.
  • Opportunities: Using the patent as leverage for licensing negotiations, partnership development, or market entry in Europe.

Conclusion: Strategic Insights

CY1115991's patent scope and claims likely cover a novel compound, its formulations, and methods of therapeutic use, providing a layered defense approach. Its landscape position, interfacing with European and international patent systems, creates opportunities for strategic IP management, including expansion into broader markets and patent family strengthening.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: The strength of the patent hinges on well-drafted claims balancing scope and technical validity, especially regarding chemical structure specificity and therapeutic uses.

  • Landscape Position: The patent serves as a cornerstone for subsequent filings and potential European market protection, with positioning influenced by related patent family members and prior art.

  • Legal Strategy: Enforceability depends on navigating prior art, claim clarity, and potential challenges, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent prosecution.

  • Market Impact: The patent affords exclusivity leverage, affecting licensing, commercialization, and competitive landscape dynamics.

  • Global Expansion: Using Cyprus as a priority filing can facilitate international patent filings under the Paris Convention, optimizing territorial coverage.


FAQs

1. What are the main factors influencing the strength of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like CY1115991?
Claim strength depends on clarity, specificity in chemical structure and use, narrowness aligned with inventive step, and support from the description. Broad, ambiguous claims risk invalidation, whereas precise claims provide enforceable boundaries.

2. How does the patent landscape affect the potential for generic drug entry?
A robust patent landscape with broad claims protecting core compounds and formulations can delay generic entry. Conversely, narrow or weak claims may open pathways for biosimilar or generic manufacturers post-licensing or patent expiry.

3. Can a patent filed in Cyprus be enforced in other countries?
No, patents are territorial rights. However, Cyprus filing can serve as a priority date for subsequent applications in other jurisdictions, such as via the EPO or national filings under the Paris Convention.

4. How important are patent citations in determining the validity of CY1115991?
Citations to prior art establish the novelty and inventive step. A patent with numerous citations to similar prior art may be more vulnerable to invalidity challenges unless it demonstrates a significant inventive leap.

5. What strategic advantages does patent protection in Cyprus offer to pharmaceutical companies?
Cyprus provides a streamlined route into the European patent system, enabling strategic European validation. It acts as a gateway for cross-border patent portfolio expansion and can facilitate licensing and market entry strategies.


Sources:

  1. European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines.
  2. Standard pharmaceutical patent examination practices.
  3. Patent landscape analysis frameworks.
  4. Cyprus Patent Office official guidelines.
  5. Strategic patent management literature.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.