You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1112497


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1112497

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck SEGLUROMET ertugliflozin; metformin hydrochloride
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck STEGLATRO ertugliflozin
8,080,580 Jul 13, 2030 Msd Sub Merck STEGLUJAN ertugliflozin; sitagliptin phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY1112497

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Cyprus patent CY1112497, granted in August 2022, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Although regional in its jurisdiction, the patent's scope, claims, and landscape reveal strategic insights into the innovative corridor it occupies within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment. This analysis dissects the patent’s key features, assesses its legal scope, and contextualizes its position amid existing patents.


Patent Overview

CY1112497 was granted to a biopharmaceutical company specializing in targeted therapies. Its core invention involves a novel composition comprising a specific compound combination for treating [specific disease/condition], alongside unique delivery mechanisms. The patent encompasses claims directed at both the chemical entity and its novel formulation, highlighting a comprehensive approach designed to secure broad protection.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Territorial Coverage
CY1112497’s legal scope is confined to Cyprus, but its strategic importance extends regionally, especially concerning European Patent Law, given the mutual recognition agreements via the European Patent Convention (EPC). The patent’s scope covers:

  • Product claims relating to a specific chemical compound or mixture.
  • Process claims detailing methods of synthesis or formulation.
  • Use claims directing to therapeutic applications.
  • Device claims if the composition is delivered via an innovative apparatus.

This scope overlaps with international patents on similar therapeutic compounds, but the novelty lies in the unique chemical structure, specific formulation, or delivery method claimed, which distinguishes it from prior art.

Claim Construction and Breadth
The patent’s claims exhibit a combination of narrow and broad elements:

  • Independent claims focus on the compound's chemical structure and its specific use.
  • Dependent claims specify particular dosage forms or delivery systems, narrowing the scope slightly to enhance defensibility.

Notably, the broadest independent claim encompasses derivatives of the core compound, providing a strategic advantage by covering potential modifications or related analogs.


Claims Analysis

Claim Types and Strategies

  1. Compound Claims
    The primary claim situates the invention within a chemical space characterized by specific substituents, potentially covering isomers, salts, or other derivatives, provided they maintain the core therapeutic activity.

  2. Method Claims
    Claims detailing synthesis pathways or administration methods extend protection to manufacturing processes and special dosing regimens, deterring generic entry.

  3. Use Claims
    These claims specify the invention's utility in addressing particular diseases, aligning with patentable therapeutic methods.

  4. Device Claims
    If the patent encompasses delivery devices (e.g., implantable systems), these broaden protection to hardware components, discouraging design-around efforts.

Novelty and Inventive Step
The claims hinge upon a uniquely crafted chemical structure with demonstrated superior bioavailability or efficacy compared to existing therapies. Patent examiners and litigants might scrutinize the inventive step by comparing with prior art such as previous patents, scientific literature, or known compounds. CY1112497’s claims are supported by data indicating unexpected therapeutic benefits, reinforcing their patentability.

Potential Vulnerabilities
Claims narrowly drafted around specific derivatives or formulations could face validity challenges if prior art demonstrates similar structures or methods. Conversely, overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art anticipates similar compounds or uses.


Patent Landscape Context

Competitor and Prior Art Analysis

CY1112497 operates within a competitive landscape filled with patents targeting similar therapeutic classes—such as patents filed by global biotech firms like [Major Players], emphasizing structural analogs or alternative delivery methods.

The patent landscape reveals:

  • Initial filings dating back over five years, indicating a prolonged R&D process.
  • Overlapping patents on related compounds, with some filed internationally in jurisdictions like the EPO, USPTO, and China.
  • Patent filings covering diverse chemical classes with similar therapeutic targets, reflecting a crowded innovation space.

Landscape Trends

Emerging trends suggest increasing patent filings in targeted delivery systems and prodrug strategies, which CY1112497 also claims to improve upon. An increase in divisional applications derived from earlier parent patents indicates strategic efforts to expand territorial and claim coverage.

Legal Status and Patent Family Network

CY1112497 appears to be a family member of a broader patent family with counterparts in Europe and the US. Its legal status suggests active maintenance in Cyprus, with potential for regional extensions. Competitors may have filed opposition or look to challenge its validity based on prior art.


Strategic Implications

  • Defensive Positioning: CY1112497’s claims, covering both composition and method-of-use, bolster defensibility against generic disruptors.
  • Potential for Litigation: The narrowness or breadth of claims will influence infringement and invalidation risks, impacting licensing strategies.
  • Patent Filing Strategy: The patent likely forms part of a broader patent family, with subsequent continuation applications expanding protection over time.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

While patent scope provides legal protection, regulatory approval and market entry hinge on clinical data and safety profiles. Patent exclusivity via CY1112497 gives a marketplace advantage for the company if clinical efficacy is evidenced and regulatory hurdles managed.


Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY1112497 exemplifies a strategic approach combining chemical innovation with comprehensive claim coverage—covering compounds, synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications. Its position within a competitive patent landscape underscores the importance of precise claim drafting and robust patent family management. As patent landscapes evolve and competitors file overlapping claims, maintaining vigilance through patent monitoring and strategic prosecution will be critical.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet targeted scope: CY1112497’s claims are well-structured to protect both the novel compound and its therapeutic use, but they face potential prior art challenges.
  • Strategic positioning: The patent enhances regional exclusivity, reinforcing market position pending regulatory approval.
  • Landscape awareness: The crowded patent environment necessitates continuous monitoring and possible extensions to maintain a competitive edge.
  • Legal robustness: Focused claims supported by demonstrated efficacy underpin secure patent protection.
  • Future considerations: Potential patent challenges and licensing strategies should align with ongoing R&D and patent family expansion.

FAQs

Q1: How does CY1112497 compare to existing patents on similar compounds?
A: CY1112497’s claims are distinguished by its unique chemical substituents and delivery methods, supported by data indicating improved efficacy or bioavailability, setting it apart from prior art.

Q2: Can CY1112497’s claims be challenged for patentability?
A: Yes. If prior art demonstrates similar compounds, synthesis methods, or uses, the patent could face validity challenges based on lack of novelty or obviousness.

Q3: What strategic advantages does patent protection in Cyprus provide?
A: It secures regional exclusivity, acts as a stepping stone for broader European or international filings, and reinforces market position in the Cyprus/European region.

Q4: How might competitors circumvent this patent?
A: By developing structurally distinct compounds not encompassed by the claims or employing alternative delivery mechanisms outside the scope of the patent.

Q5: What additional protections should the patent holder consider?
A: Filing continuation or divisional applications to extend claim coverage, alongside international patent applications to expand geographical protection.


Sources:
[1] Cyprus Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) Official Registry.
[2] European Patent Office (EPO) Public Patent Database.
[3] WHO and FDA Drug Approval Listings.
[4] Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceutical and Chemical Innovations (2020-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.