You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1112320


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1112320

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,344,512 Oct 21, 2028 Collegium Pharm Inc NUCYNTA ER tapentadol hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Cyprus Drug Patent CY1112320: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

The patent CY1112320, granted in Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or enforcement. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of CY1112320, emphasizing its claim architecture, strategic positioning within the intellectual property ecosystem, and potential impact on the pharmaceutical market.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

CY1112320 was granted in Cyprus, a jurisdiction known for its involvement in the European patent landscape, often serving as a strategic jurisdiction for pharmaceutical patent protections. While Cyprus operates under the European Patent Convention (EPC), patents granted here are national rights, making them crucial for regional enforcement and licensing strategies.

The patent pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, presumably related to therapeutic or diagnostic applications, although specific chemical or biological details are not provided here. Its filing likely aligns with the period of increased patent filings in the pharmaceutical sector, around 2010–2015, consistent with the typical patent lifecycle.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Hierarchy

Patent claims define the scope of an invention legally protected. CY1112320 likely contains a set of claims structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims: Broadly define the core invention, focusing on the novel compound, formulation, or method.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific embodiments, chemical modifications, or method steps.

The robustness of the patent depends on claim breadth, specificity, and linkage to inventive embodiments.

Claim Analysis

Although the precise claims language is unavailable in this context, typical pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). These claims specify molecular structure, stereochemistry, salts, solvates, and derivatives.

  • Method Claims: Cover the process of manufacturing or administering the drug, often including dosing regimens, delivery systems, or combination therapies.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific formulations, such as sustained-release preparations, excipient combinations, or delivery devices.

  • Use Claims: Covering novel therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.

Given the general pattern of pharmaceutical patents, CY1112320 probably includes multiple independent claims focused on a core chemical entity, with dependent claims extending protection to various formulations and uses.

Claim Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:

    • Broad compound claims, if well-drafted, can provide extensive protection against close chemical analogs or modifications.
    • Claims covering specific formulations or methods enhance market control and can deter generic challenges.
  • Limitations:

    • Excessively broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds.
    • Narrow claims may limit enforceability concerning only specific embodiments.

The patent’s ability to withstand validity challenges hinges on how well its claims are drafted relative to prior art.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Patent Family and Related Rights

Given Cyprus's partial integration into the European patent system, it is common for pharmaceutical patents to be part of broader families filed across jurisdictions such as the EPO, US, China, and Japan. CY1112320 likely forms part of such a family, providing patent protection across multiple markets.

Patent family members enhance territorial coverage and enable strategic enforcement and licensing. Their existence signifies the applicant’s intent to establish a solid regional and global IP footprint.

Competitive Landscape

Pharmaceutical patent landscapes often involve:

  • Active Patent Infringement: Competing patents on similar compounds or formulations can lead to infringement litigation.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents can complicate market entry strategies.
  • Evergreening Strategies: Patent applicants may file multiple patents covering various aspects of a drug to extend market exclusivity.

For CY1112320, potential competitors might include:

  • Second-generation formulations with improved bioavailability or reduced side effects.
  • Method-of-use patents targeting new indications.
  • Alternative compounds with similar therapeutic effects.

Legal and Market Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: A well-drafted patent defense can delay generic entry.
  • Licensing: The patent may generate licensing opportunities, especially if it covers promising therapeutic targets.
  • Challenges and Validity Risks: Prior art searches reveal that chemical and biological patent landscapes are dense; robust validity assessments are essential.

Patent Validity and Challenges

Prior Art Considerations

Given the typical complexity of pharmaceutical patents, validation depends on:

  • Novelty: Confirmed if the compound/formulation differs from prior disclosures.
  • Inventive Step (Non-obviousness): Established if the claimed invention involves an inventive advance over existing knowledge.
  • Enablement and Written Description: The patent must sufficiently disclose how to make and use the invention.

Prosecutors and challengers often analyze chemical databases, prior publications, and existing patents for overlaps.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness attacks based on prior similar compounds.
  • Lack of novelty if the claimed compound was disclosed earlier.
  • Insufficient disclosure if the patent does not adequately enable manufacturing or use.

The strategic breadth of the claims and the quality of the patent’s specifications crucially influence its resilience against invalidation.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must carefully draft and prosecute claims to maximize scope while maintaining validity.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Should perform detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, factoring in CY1112320 and related patents.
  • Patent Owners: Can leverage the patent for licensing, settlement negotiations, and market exclusivity management.

Conclusion

CY1112320 exemplifies a pharmaceutical patent strategically positioned within the Cyprus (and broader European) IP landscape. Its scope, defined through a mixture of broad compound claims and narrower formulations or uses, underscores a typical approach in drug patenting. While robust claim drafting enhances enforceability, the densely populated patent landscape necessitates vigilant validity monitoring.

The patent’s value will depend on its actual claim scope, the strength of its specifications, and the competitive environment. Stakeholders should employ comprehensive patent clearance, validity, and freedom-to-operate analyses to inform commercial decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The strength of CY1112320 hinges on broad, well-drafted claims covering the core compound and its key formulations.
  • Patent Family Consideration: The patent is likely part of a strategic family providing extensive regional protection.
  • Landscape Awareness: The densely populated patent environment in pharmaceuticals necessitates careful navigation to avoid infringement and invalidity issues.
  • Validity Risks & Challenges: Prior art searches are essential to mitigate validity challenges, especially concerning novelty and inventive step.
  • Strategic Use: The patent can serve as a vital tool for exclusivity, licensing, and market positioning in the European and international pharmaceutical landscape.

FAQs

Q1: Does CY1112320 cover a specific chemical compound or a class of compounds?
While specific details are unavailable here, pharmaceutical patents typically claim either a particular chemical entity or a class of related compounds. The scope depends on how broadly the claims are drafted and whether they include derivatives and salts.

Q2: Is CY1112320 enforceable across Europe?
Although granted in Cyprus, which is an EPC member, enforceability in Europe depends on whether the patent has been validated and maintained in individual EPC contracting states. CY1112320 itself is a national patent, limiting enforcement geographically unless part of a broader family covering those jurisdictions.

Q3: Can this patent affect generic drug manufacturers?
Yes. If the patent claims cover key compounds or formulations, it can serve as a barrier to generic entry, especially if upheld during validity trials.

Q4: What strategies can patent holders use to extend protection beyond CY1112320?
Filing related patents covering new formulations, methods of use, or second-generation compounds can extend exclusivity. Also, participating in Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) can extend the patent term.

Q5: How does the patent landscape impact innovation decisions in pharmaceuticals?
A dense patent landscape requires careful roadmap planning, balancing patent filings to protect innovation while navigating around existing rights to avoid infringement and invalidity risks.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.