You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1111988


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1111988

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am APTIOM eslicarbazepine acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2026 Sumitomo Pharma Am APTIOM eslicarbazepine acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Introduction

Last updated: August 22, 2025

The patent CY1111988 represents a significant development within the pharmaceutical landscape of Cyprus, reflecting strategic intellectual property (IP) protections aimed at specific drug compounds or formulations. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal practitioners—seeking to navigate regional protection rights, potential licensing opportunities, or contesting patent validity.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, contextualizes its position within the patent landscape, and offers insights into implications for market access, infringement, and patent enforcement.


Overview of Patent CY1111988

Cyprus Patent CY1111988, granted by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIPI) of Cyprus, pertains typically to a pharmaceutical invention. While explicit details of the patent claims are essential to determining the extent of protection, general practice suggests that such patents cover novel drug compounds, their formulations, methods of manufacture, or use.

The patent is active as the publication date indicates (assuming issued within the last decade), providing a 20-year exclusivity window, in accordance with regional standards aligned with international patent laws.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of CY1111988 hinges on the breadth of its claims, which define the legal boundaries of exclusivity. It can be broadly categorized into the following components:

  1. Novel Compound or Class of Compounds: If the patent covers specific chemical entities, the claims delineate the exact chemical structure, including substituents, stereochemistry, and variations. Such claims seek to protect the core novel molecule(s) with therapeutic utility.

  2. Pharmacological Use: Claims may extend to the use of the compound(s) in treating particular diseases or conditions. These are "use claims" that specify a method of treatment or diagnostic method.

  3. Formulation Claims: If the invention includes specific formulations—e.g., sustained-release tablets, injectable forms—claims define features like excipients, dosing regimens, or delivery mechanisms.

  4. Manufacturing Process: Process claims could describe novel methods of synthesizing the drug, purification techniques, or formulation preparation steps.

  5. Combination Claims: The patent may include claims covering combinations of the identified compound with other active ingredients, targeting synergistic effects.

The scope is primarily restrictive to what is explicitly claimed; any unclaimed modifications or alternative compounds may fall outside its protection, which influences generic development and patent challenges.


Claims Analysis

The core claims of CY1111988 determine enforceability and infringement boundaries:

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, defining the primary invention—such as a chemical structure or a method of treatment. For example, an independent claim might claim a novel compound with specific substituents exhibiting activity against a targeted disease.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, providing specific embodiments or variants. They refine the independent claim with preferred features—e.g., particular dosage forms, stability data, or specific uses.

  • Claim Language and Specificity: Clear, concise, and non-ambiguous claims strengthen patent enforceability. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, especially if prior art exists. Claims with multiple inventive steps provide stronger protection but may be more susceptible to validity challenges.

In the absence of the patent text, typical analysis reveals the necessity for broad claims with well-defined structural features and precise therapeutic indications.


Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding CY1111988 involves analyzing prior art, related patents, and potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations:

  1. Prior Art: The patent landscape likely includes earlier patents detailing similar compounds, formulations, or uses. If CY1111988 introduces a novel chemical entity or application not referenced in prior art, its validity is reinforced.

  2. Overlap with International Patents: Many pharmaceutical patents are filed internationally, notably in major markets like the EU, US, and China. Cross-referencing CY1111988 with global patent databases (e.g., WIPO PATENTSCOPE, USPTO, EPO Espacenet) reveals potential overlaps or conflicts.

  3. Patent Families and Priority: If CY1111988 claims priority from earlier applications, the priority date influences the scope of novelty and inventive step.

  4. Patent Term and Life Cycle: Given the 20-year term, patent expiration dates are crucial. Market exclusivity diminishes over time, opening opportunities for generics.

  5. Legal Status and Challenges: The patent’s enforceability can be affected by opposition proceedings, validity challenges, or non-compliance (e.g., lack of inventive step).

  6. Strategic Positioning: CY1111988 may be part of a broader patent portfolio, encompassing secondary patents and supplementary protection certificates.


Implications for Market and Legal Strategy

  • Infringement Risks: Manufacturers developing similar drugs in Cyprus must compare their claims with CY1111988. Overlap indicates potential infringement risks, leading to legal action or licensing negotiations.

  • Patent Challenges: Competitors may seek to invalidate weaker claims or narrow the scope through post-grant opposition or litigation, especially if prior art exists.

  • Licensing and Collaborations: Patent holders can leverage these rights for licensing deals, research collaborations, or strategic alliances, especially if the patent covers a promising therapeutic indication.

  • Expiry and Market Entry: Once the patent nears expiration, generic manufacturers may prepare for market entry. Detailed analysis of patent claims helps in planning patent cliff strategies or filings for secondary patents.


Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

Pharmaceutical companies operating in Cyprus or targeting the regional market must consider:

  • Patent Filing Strategies: Protecting core compounds, formulations, and uses through layered patents extends market exclusivity.

  • Patent Mining and FTO Analysis: Continual monitoring of national and international patent databases ensures freedom to operate and avoids potential litigation.

  • Localization of Claims: Regional differences in patent laws could influence claim scope and enforcement. CY1111988’s positioning within Cyprus law aligns with EU standards, providing a robust legal framework.


Conclusion

The scope of Cyprus patent CY1111988 encompasses carefully crafted claims targeting specific drug compounds, uses, or formulations, forming a strategic barrier against generic competition. Its place within the patent landscape depends on its novelty relative to prior art, breadth of claims, and ongoing legal status.

Stakeholders must conduct detailed, claim-by-claim evaluations, including comparison with global patents, to assess infringement risks and licensing opportunities. Maintaining patent strength entails vigilant landscape analysis, timely filings, and dynamic legal strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • CY1111988’s claims likely focus on a novel drug compound, its uses, or specific formulations, with scope determined by the precise language.
  • The patent’s strength depends on claim clarity, novelty, and inventive step relative to prior art.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals potential overlaps and guides strategic decisions on infringement clearance and licensing.
  • Expiry timelines are critical; early planning for generic entry or secondary patent filings can optimize market positioning.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal status and related patents ensures effective IP management and competitive advantage.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent like CY1111988?
    Pharmaceutical patents generally last 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal challenges.

  2. How can I determine if my drug infringes on CY1111988?
    A detailed comparison of your product’s claims and features with CY1111988’s claims informs infringement risk. Legal consultation and patent attorney analysis are recommended.

  3. Can I challenge the validity of CY1111988?
    Yes. Challenges can be filed based on prior art or lack of inventive step, but they require substantial evidence and are subject to legal procedures.

  4. What strategies exist to extend patent protection beyond CY1111988?
    Filing secondary or patent-term extension patents, developing new formulations, or novel uses can prolong market exclusivity.

  5. How does Cyprus’s patent law align with international standards?
    Cyprus’s patent law follows EU directives and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), ensuring consistent regional protection standards.


References

[1] Cyprus Department of Intellectual Property. [Official Patent Database].
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE Database.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Analysis Reports.
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.