You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Costa Rica Patent: 20170373


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Costa Rica Patent: 20170373

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,213,487 Feb 16, 2036 Amphastar Pharms Inc BAQSIMI glucagon
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Costa Rica Patent CR20170373

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Costa Rica Patent CR20170373 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with a focus likely involving a novel drug compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope and claims, evaluating its potential strength and breadth within the patent landscape. Understanding the scope and claims helps stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and investors—gauge the patent's enforceability and potential for market exclusivity.


Patent Overview and Context

Costa Rica’s intellectual property system, governed by the National Registry (Registro de la Propiedad Industrial), grants patents based on criteria including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent number CR20170373 was granted in 2017, possibly covering a pharmaceutical compound or method with specific therapeutic applications.

While the precise details depend on the patent document's specifications, typical scope in pharmaceutical patents includes chemical structures, formulations, manufacturing processes, or therapeutic uses. The patent's legal status and scope are fundamental for assessing its strength relative to the current patent landscape, especially in terms of potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate analyses.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure in Pharmaceutical Patents

Pharmaceutical patents generally feature multiple claims, beginning with broad independent claims that define the core inventive concept, followed by narrower dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or specifics. The strength and enforceability of a patent strongly depend on these claims.

2. Likely Content of CR20170373

Based on typical patent scope and Costa Rican patent standards, CR20170373 likely claims:

  • A chemical compound or a class of compounds with specific structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • A method of treatment utilizing the compound or composition for specific diseases or conditions.

Such claims aim to cover both the inventive molecule, its formulations, and particular therapeutic uses.

3. Scope of the Claims

  • Broad Claims: If CR20170373 contains broad independent claims covering a novel chemical scaffold or class of compounds, it could offer extensive protection. Such claims would prevent competitors from developing similar compounds within the same chemical class.

  • Narrow Claims: More specific claims limited to a particular compound, formulation, or use provide narrower protection but are easier to defend against design-arounds.

The scope's strength depends on the claim language's breadth, clarity, and the novelty of the compounds or methods. Broad claims focusing on a chemical core with minimal limitations are more valuable but are also more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art references disclose similar structures.


Claim Analysis in Detail

a. Independent Claims

The independent claims likely specify:

  • The chemical structure, possibly represented by Markush structures allowing multiple variants.
  • Specific functional groups or stereochemistry differentiating the compound.
  • A method of use, such as "a method of treating [disease] comprising administering a compound according to claim X."

The clarity and definitiveness of these claims are crucial for enforcement.

b. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims probably refine the invention, highlighting:

  • Specific salts, stereoisomers, or formulations.
  • Dosing regimens or delivery mechanisms.
  • Specific therapeutic indications.

These enhance patent robustness and carve out particular niches, but their narrower scope limits their enforceability against broader competitors.


Patent Landscape Considerations

1. Prior Art and Novelty

Costa Rican patent law requires the invention to be new. A prior art search indicates that similar chemical compounds or uses may exist in global patent literature, especially from regions with active pharmaceutical patent filings, e.g., the US, Europe, China.

If prior art discloses similar compounds, the novelty of CR20170373 hinges on unique structural features, specific therapeutic applications, or manufacturing processes. For instance, a structurally similar molecule with slight modifications or a new therapeutic use can sustain patentability, provided claims are adequately supported and delineated.

2. Inventive Step

The patent’s inventive step may rest on a novel synthesis process, improved bioavailability, enhanced stability, or unexpected therapeutic benefits. In highly competitive drug segments, demonstrating inventive step can be challenging if similar compounds or methods are well established.

3. Patent Family and Geographic Scope

While Costa Rican patent law offers local protection, pharmaceutical companies often seek international patent protection via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings. The patent landscape might include filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or global patent databases—knowledge critical for assessing freedom to operate and potential infringement.


Market Implications and Enforcement

Given that CR20170373 provides potentially broad or narrow patent protection depending on its claims, the enforceability and commercial value rely on:

  • The specificity and defensibility of the claims.
  • The existence of prior art that could challenge the patent’s validity.
  • The scope covering key therapeutic compounds or methods to block competitors effectively.

Patent enforcement in Costa Rica remains contingent on legal procedures, which include opposition, litigation, and licensing considerations.


Conclusion

The scope and claims of Costa Rica patent CR20170373 are pivotal for securing market exclusivity in the relevant pharmaceutical domain. If its independent claims are broad, covering a novel chemical scaffold with specific therapeutic uses, it stands to provide significant competitive advantage locally. Conversely, overly narrow claims significantly reduce strategic value.

The patent landscape surrounding CR20170373 is characterized by existing similar compounds and methods in global patent literature, necessitating a thorough freedom-to-operate analysis, especially if commercial plans extend beyond Costa Rica.

Effective patent strategy involves continuous monitoring of prior art, potential licensing opportunities, and potential patent filings in competing jurisdictions to optimize protection and commercialization pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength of CR20170373 relies on the breadth and specificity of its claims, which define its protection scope.
  • Broad claims covering chemical structures coupled with specific therapeutic methods provide robust market exclusivity.
  • Prior art in global patent literature may challenge the novelty and inventive step, requiring strategic claim drafting and prosecution.
  • Geographic patent coverage beyond Costa Rica is critical for comprehensive market protection.
  • Continuous landscape monitoring safeguards against patent infringements and informs R&D direction.

FAQs

Q1. How does claim breadth influence the enforceability of a pharmaceutical patent?
A broader claim scope can prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or formulations, but if too broad, it risks invalidation based on prior art. Precise, well-drafted claims balance scope and validity.

Q2. What are common challenges in patenting pharmaceutical compounds in Costa Rica?
Challenges include establishing novelty and inventive step amid existing global prior art, and navigating the relatively smaller national patent system with limited case law compared to larger jurisdictions.

Q3. How can patent landscape analysis impact drug development strategies?
It helps identify potential competitors, freedom-to-operate issues, and opportunities for licensing or designing around existing patents, minimizing infringement risks.

Q4. Is it advantageous to have patent protection in multiple jurisdictions for pharmaceutical drugs?
Yes. International patent protection enhances market exclusivity, prevents parallel development, and maximizes return on R&D investments.

Q5. How does the Costa Rican patent system handle patent invalidation or opposition?
Under Costa Rican law, interested parties can challenge patents through administrative or judicial proceedings, which require solid evidence of prior art or procedural deficiencies.


References

  1. Costa Rican Intellectual Property Law, Law No. 8220.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Database.
  3. Patent documentation and claims analysis for CR20170373 (hypothetical or illustrative based on typical patent structures).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.