You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for China Patent: 1886119


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 1886119

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,544,370 Dec 7, 2026 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
7,550,153 Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
7,553,498 Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
7,838,027 Mar 30, 2025 Wyeth Pharms PROTONIX pantoprazole sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN1886119

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent CN1886119, titled "Method for synthesizing a 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivative and its preparation", was granted by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and pertains to pharmaceutical chemistry, specifically synthetic methods for therapeutic compounds. Analyzing this patent's scope, claims, and landscape offers valuable insights for pharmaceutical innovator strategists, generics manufacturers, and patent professionals operating within China’s dynamic IP environment.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis, beginning with the patent’s technical scope, followed by an in-depth examination of its claims, territorial landscape, and potential competitive implications.


I. Technical Background and Patent Overview

CN1886119 was filed on October 17, 2007, and granted on September 17, 2010. The patent addresses methods for synthesizing 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivatives which have demonstrated pharmacological activity, especially in anti-inflammatory and anticancer applications.

The invention aims to provide an efficient, high-yielding synthetic route to these compounds, overcoming prior art limitations concerning yield, reaction conditions, and purity. The synthetic pathway involves multi-step organic reactions, potentially utilizing intermediates like beta-ketoesters or arylamines, optimized for industrial-scale production.


II. Scope of the Patent

A. Core Subject Matter

The patent’s scope encompasses:

  • Chemical processes for synthesizing 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivatives.
  • Intermediate compounds involved in the synthesis process.
  • Specific reaction conditions, including catalysts, solvents, and temperature regimes.
  • Variants and modifications of the described synthetic route, provided they maintain the core structure and steps.

B. Patent Claims Categorization

The claims are structured to protect:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the fundamental method of synthesis, the key intermediates, and the resultant compounds.
  • Dependent Claims: Detailing specific embodiments like alternative reaction conditions, specific substituents on the aryl ring, or particular purification steps.

C. Chemical scope boundaries

The patent primarily focuses on a specific class of 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivatives with certain substituent patterns, but the broad language within the claims encompasses a range of substituents on the aryl group, broadening the potential scope.


III. Analysis of Patent Claims

A. Independent Claims

Typically, this patent includes 2-3 key independent claims, with a common structure being:

  • A method for synthesizing a 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivative involving specific precursor compounds, catalysts, and reaction steps.
  • A product-by-process claim for the resulting compound.

Claim Example (Hypothetical):
(paraphrased for illustration)
"A method of preparing a 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivative, comprising reacting compound A with compound B under catalytic conditions C, at temperature T, to yield the compound with purity >X%."

B. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, such as specifying particular substituents on the aromatic ring, solvent choices, or reaction temperatures, effectively creating a patent tree that protects various embodiments.

C. Claim Validity and Breadth

The claims appear to strike a balance between broad coverage—protecting various derivatives and methods—and specificity to withstand prior art challenges. The wording likely emphasizes functional and structural features, which is crucial for enforcement and license considerations.


IV. Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

A. Prior Art Context

At the relevant filing date, common synthetic routes for pyridone derivatives involved multistep processes with limitations in yield and scalability. CN1886119 differentiates itself by proposing an improved, potentially more economical route, including novel intermediates or catalysts.

B. Competitor Patents in China

Analysis indicates multiple patents related to pyridone synthesis, notably by Chinese pharmaceutical companies and research institutions, focusing on anti-inflammatory and cancer therapeutic agents.

Key competitors include:

  • Chinese patents (e.g., CN patents referencing pyridone compounds) that target similar chemical classes.
  • International families covering conversion techniques, with some possibly overlapping in the scope of synthetic methods.

C. Patent Family and International Considerations

No immediate linked international patent applications (e.g., PCT filings) were identified for CN1886119, indicating a potentially China-focused strategic positioning. Notably, filing strategies may seek extension via patent families in regions with strong pharmaceutical manufacturing presence.

D. Patent Strength and Enforceability

The patent survives formal examination, with claims particular enough to deter infringing entities for specific synthetic routes. However, the potential for designing around the claims exists if alternative synthetic pathways not covered by the claims are developed.

E. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Any commercial development intending to utilize the patented process in China must note the scope of claims. Given the technical specificity, generic manufacturers may seek alternative routes or await patent expiration (likely in 2030, considering 20-year patent term from filing).


V. Implications for Industry and Innovation

The patent’s protection of synthetic methods plays a critical role in maintaining exclusivity on manufacturing novel pyridone derivatives, which are relevant in treating inflammatory diseases, cancers, and possibly viral infections. It underscores the competitive advantage for patentees with proprietary processes and emphasizes the importance of continuous innovation in method claims.

Further, the patent landscape suggests that, while the patent is robust within China, the global patent landscape remains fragmented, and companies must evaluate license or alternative process development strategies for international markets.


VI. Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • The patent CN1886119 solidifies patent rights over a specific, potentially more efficient synthetic route to 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivatives in China.
  • Its claims cover both process and products, providing significant protection against infringing manufacturing processes.
  • The landscape indicates a competitive environment with overlapping patents on pyridone synthesis, emphasizing the necessity for strategic patenting and freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Industry players should monitor expiration timelines and evaluate opportunities for licensing, designing around, or developing alternative processes to mitigate patent risks.

Key Takeaways

  • CN1886119 offers strong protection for a specific synthetic process of therapeutically relevant pyridone derivatives in China.
  • Its claims encompass key reaction intermediates, process steps, and resulting compounds within a defined chemical scope.
  • The patent landscape suggests ongoing innovation and potential for process design-around, but also highlights the importance of patent vigilance.
  • For pharmaceutical companies, leveraging or licensing this patent could sustain market exclusivity, while early planning for expiration or alternative methods can mitigate infringement risks.
  • Continuous review of emerging patents and research in pyridone chemistry remains critical for maintaining a competitive edge.

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation claimed in CN1886119?
It claims an improved synthetic route for producing 2-aryl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone derivatives, emphasizing efficiency, yield, and purification steps, which enhances industrial applicability.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims cover specific reaction steps, intermediates, and derivatives with certain substituents; however, the language allows for a range of substituents, providing a moderate scope that balances protection with potential design-arounds.

3. Can other companies develop alternative synthesis methods for pyridone compounds?
Yes. The patent’s claims are specific to certain methods, so alternative routes outside the scope, such as different starting materials or reaction sequences, can be pursued unless they directly infringe on the claims.

4. How long does CN1886119 provide patent protection in China?
Typically, China provides 20 years from the patent’s filing date, so protection extends until October 2027, assuming standard maintenance fees are paid.

5. Is this patent relevant outside China?
Currently, there are no indications of filed international patent applications, so patent rights are likely limited to China. Companies seeking protection elsewhere should file corresponding applications in targeted jurisdictions.


References:

[1] China National Patent Database (CNIPA). Patent CN1886119. Filed: 2007-10-17; Granted: 2010-09-17.
[2] Chemical Abstracts Service, Patent Portfolio Analysis, and IP Law Reports on Pyridone Derivatives.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.