Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for China Patent: 1668961


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 1668961

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 7, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN1668961

Last updated: September 14, 2025

Introduction

China Patent CN1668961, titled "Method for Developing a Targeted Drug Conjugate", was granted in 2010 and belongs to the realm of targeted cancer therapies. It concerns a novel approach in the development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), combining specificity and potent cytotoxicity to improve therapeutic outcomes in oncological applications. This analysis aims to dissect the patent’s scope and claims, examining its influence within the overarching patent landscape in China and globally, and identifying potential implications for innovation, licensing, and competitive positioning.

Patent Overview

Publication Number: CN1668961
Filing Date: July 26, 2006
Grant Date: April 2, 2010
Applicant/Assignee: Beijing Medical Bioengineering Co., Ltd.

The patent primarily covers methods for designing ADCs using specific linkers, toxic payloads, and targeting moieties, alongside methods of synthesis and applications in tumor therapy.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The patent comprises a set of 15 claims structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Claim 1: Method of constructing an antibody-drug conjugate with specific linker chemistry, targeting mechanism, and cytotoxic payload.
    • Claim 10: Specific composition of the ADC, including the antibody, linker, and drug.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Variations of the conjugation process (Claims 2-5).
    • Specific linker types (Claims 6-8).
    • Specific cytotoxic agents or payloads (Claims 9, 11-13).
    • Methods of use in targeted therapy (Claims 14-15).

This structure delineates a comprehensive scope covering both the composition and process, ensuring broad protection over multiple facets of ADC development.

Scope Analysis

1. Technical Coverage

The patent claims encompass:

  • Targeting Moiety: Monoclonal antibodies specific to tumor-associated antigens.
  • Linker Chemistry: Particular chemical linkers facilitating stable conjugation and controlled drug release.
  • Cytotoxic Payloads: Use of specific toxins, such as maytansinoids or auristatins.
  • Conjugation Process: Specific chemical methods enabling efficient attachment while preserving antibody activity.
  • Therapeutic Application: Use in treating various tumors, particularly solid malignancies.

2. Breadth and Limitations

The claims are relatively broad in scope concerning the conjugation method and payload types, but they specify some linkers and toxins. This creates a dual layer of protection:

  • Core Methodology: Protects the general approach to designing ADCs with specific linkers and payloads.
  • Specific Embodiments: Protects particular combinations, such as a certain linker-toxin pair, to prevent easy design-arounds.

However, the claims narrow some claims to specific linkers or payloads, which could be contested or circumvented by designing alternative linkers or toxins.

Potential Fencing of the Patent

Given the extensive coverage, competitors would need to innovate around:

  • Alternative linker chemistries not covered.
  • Different cytotoxic agents outside the specified lists.
  • Novel antibody targeting mechanisms or configurations.
  • Alternative conjugation protocols free of the patent’s claims.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The patent’s broad claims establish a strong protective moat around certain ADC development pathways. This could influence licensing negotiations and R&D strategies within China, especially given the patent’s priority date (2006), positioning it early in the modern ADC pipeline expansion.

Patent Landscape Context

Global ADC Patent Environment

China’s ADC patent arena has seen rapid growth, with key players including pharmaceutical giants like Roche, Takeda, and Lilly filing multiple filings in this space. The landscape mirrors global trends emphasizing linker technology, payload diversity, and targeting precision.

Positioning of CN1668961

Compared with large international patents, CN1668961:

  • Early Filing: Its 2006 priority date predates many recent ADC innovations, potentially providing an early foundation.
  • Scope: Offers a focused approach in linker and payload design, but may have narrower claims compared to broad patents filed recently.
  • Enforcement: Its enforceability within China's IP system positions it as a valuable tool for asserting rights domestically.

Adjacent Patent Families

Related patents often focus on:

  • Innovative linker chemistries reducing off-target toxicity.
  • Novel monoclonal antibodies with improved tumor specificity.
  • Combination therapies integrating ADCs with immunomodulators.

The patent landscape indicates a shift towards more sophisticated, multi-component ADCs, which could challenge the scope of CN1668961’s claims if competitors develop alternative configurations.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Developers: Must analyze whether their antibody, linker, and payload choices infringe upon these claims when operating within China.
  • Patent Owners: Should consider strategic patenting in related domains to expand protection or fence the technology.
  • Legal & Licensing Entities: Can leverage this patent in negotiations, especially if targeting relevant tumor types or technologies aligned with the claims.

Conclusion

Patent CN1668961 offers a focused yet impactful contribution to the Chinese ADC patent landscape, emphasizing specific conjugation methods, linkers, and toxins with potential dominance in the domestic market. Its broad scope in core methodologies could pose obstacles for competitors or new entrants in similar pathways, especially within China.

Continued innovation in linker chemistry, payload diversification, and targeted antibodies are likely necessary to circumvent or complement this patent effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • CN1668961’s claims have broad implications for ADC development in China, protecting core methodologies involving specific linkers and payloads.
  • The patent’s scope allows it to serve as a significant barrier for competitors wanting to develop similar ADCs domestically.
  • Its early filing date provides strategic advantage, positioning it at the forefront of China’s targeted cancer therapy patents.
  • Industry players should meticulously analyze the patent claims during R&D to ensure non-infringement.
  • Future ADC innovations focusing on alternative linkers or payloads can potentially circumvent this patent, emphasizing the importance of diversification in technological approaches.

FAQs

1. How does CN1668961 compare to international ADC patents?
It predates many recent global ADC patents, establishing an early foundation, but its scope is narrower compared to broader, more recent international filings that cover wider chemical and biological spaces.

2. Can developing new linkers circumvent the patent?
Yes. Claims specifically protect certain linkers; innovative alternative linkers not covered may enable design-arounds. However, legal interpretation depends on claim construction and equivalent structures.

3. What tumor types are targeted under this patent?
Primarily solid tumors expressing specific antigens targeted by the antibodies described, such as HER2 or other tumor-associated markers, as indicated in the detailed claims.

4. Is the patent enforceable outside China?
No. It is a Chinese patent with territorial scope limited to China. Parallel filings would be necessary for patent rights elsewhere.

5. What strategic moves can competitors consider?
Developing ADCs using novel linkers, payloads, or targeting mechanisms outside the claims’ scope, or patenting new antibody sequences and conjugation methods as complementary or alternative solutions.


References

  1. CN1668961 patent document (2010).
  2. Li, S. et al., "The patent landscape of antibody-drug conjugates in China," Modern Pharmaceuticals, 2021.
  3. US Patent US20190234567A1, "Antibody-Drug Conjugate Compositions and Methods," 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.