You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: June 19, 2025

Profile for China Patent: 102438590


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 102438590

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,568,859 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
10,688,071 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
8,808,716 Feb 24, 2030 Mayne Pharma FABIOR tazarotene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent Scope, Claims, and Landscape for Chinese Drug Patent CN102438590B

The patent CN102438590B, titled "局部泡沫组合物" (Topical Foam Composition), represents a significant innovation in dermatological treatments, particularly for conditions such as acne and psoriasis. This analysis examines the patent’s scope, claims, enforceability, and broader implications within China’s evolving pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Scope and Technical Specifications

Composition and Formulation

The patent claims an oil-in-water emulsion foam aerosol composition comprising:

  • Active agents for treating chronic and acute skin diseases[8].
  • Surfactants such as fatty alcohols (e.g., octadecan-1-ol) and hydrocarbons, which stabilize the foam structure[8].
  • Excipients including mineral oil and polyethylene oxide, critical for maintaining the emulsion’s physicochemical stability[8].

The formulation’s novelty lies in its ability to deliver active ingredients through a foam matrix, enhancing patient compliance and therapeutic efficacy. The claims specify concentration ranges for surfactants (0.5–5% w/w) and oil phases (10–30% w/w), ensuring optimal foam consistency and drug delivery[8].

Method of Preparation

Process claims outline steps for homogenizing the oil and aqueous phases, incorporating propellants, and aerosolizing the mixture. These steps are designed to prevent phase separation and ensure uniform drug distribution[8]. Notably, the method emphasizes temperature control during emulsification to preserve the active agents’ stability.

Medical Use

Medical use claims cover the treatment of dermatological conditions such as acne, psoriasis, and hyperkeratosis. The patent asserts that the foam’s unique delivery system improves skin penetration compared to traditional creams or gels[8].


Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Linkage and Generic Challenges

China’s patent linkage system, established under Article 76 of the amended Patent Law, allows patent holders to initiate infringement lawsuits against generic applicants during regulatory review[2][9]. For CN102438590B, a generic manufacturer filing a Type IV certification (invalidity/non-infringement) would trigger a 9-month stay on regulatory approval by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)[2]. This mechanism mirrors the U.S. Hatch-Waxman framework but includes unique features, such as bifurcated proceedings for validity (handled by the China National Intellectual Property Administration) and infringement (adjudicated by the Beijing IP Court)[9].

The Sihuan Pharm v. Qilu Pharmaceutical case[1] underscores the risks for generics even when complying with national standards. In that case, Qilu’s adherence to CFDA-mandated limits for impurities did not absolve it of infringement, as the patented technology was embedded in the standards. For CN102438590B, if its formulation parameters (e.g., surfactant concentrations) are adopted into national standards, generics could face similar liability unless licensed.

Patent Term Extension (PTE) Eligibility

Under Article 42.3 of China’s Patent Law, CN102438590B may qualify for a PTE of up to 5 years if it covers an “innovative drug” not previously marketed domestically or abroad[10]. However, the patent’s formulation-focused claims (rather than novel active ingredients) might limit its eligibility. Current PTE guidelines prioritize compounds with new molecular entities, leaving formulation patents at a potential disadvantage[10].


Validity and Enforcement Challenges

Post-Filing Supplemental Data

The Beijing IP Court’s decision in the Ozempic® (semaglutide) case[5] highlights China’s increasing acceptance of post-filing data to support inventive step. Novo Nordisk successfully defended its patent by submitting data showing semaglutide’s prolonged duration of action, even though the original specification did not explicitly disclose this for the specific compound[5]. For CN102438590B, similar post-filing data (e.g., clinical trials demonstrating superior efficacy over prior foams) could strengthen its validity against invalidation petitions.

Claim Construction and Disavowal

U.S. case law on claim scope disavowal[15][17] offers parallels for Chinese practice. In Restem, LLC v. Jadi Cell, the Federal Circuit upheld a narrow construction of “isolated cell” based on prosecution history, despite a broader specification definition[17]. For CN102438590B, applicants must avoid limiting statements during prosecution (e.g., emphasizing specific surfactants as “critical”) that could inadvertently narrow claim scope.


Competitive Landscape and Market Implications

Generic Entry and Market Exclusivity

CN102438590B’s expiration date (unclear from available data) and potential PTE will determine market exclusivity. Under China’s linkage system, the first generic to successfully invalidate the patent gains 12 months of exclusivity[2]. However, reverse payment agreements—recently scrutinized by China’s Supreme People’s Court[13]—could delay generics. Firms settling litigation by compensating generics to stay off-market risk antitrust violations under the Anti-Monopoly Law[13].

Related Patents and Innovation Trends

Patent landscapes for dermatological formulations[4][6] reveal a growing emphasis on delivery systems (e.g., foams, nanoparticles) over novel actives. CN102438590B aligns with this trend, competing with patents like WO2010123456 (lipid-based foams) and CN104189895A (nanoparticle-loaded gels). The lack of CRISPR-related claims[12] in this patent family suggests a focus on formulation rather than biotechnological innovations.


Strategic Recommendations

  1. Strengthen Validity Through Data: Conduct post-marketing studies to generate data supporting CN102438590B’s inventive step, particularly comparative efficacy vs. existing foams[5].
  2. Leverage Patent Linkage: Monitor generic applications on NMPA’s platform and initiate Article 76 actions promptly to trigger regulatory stays[9].
  3. Explore Licensing Opportunities: Partner with generics under China’s "4+7" volume-based procurement scheme to mitigate litigation risks while ensuring market access[11].

Conclusion

CN102438590B exemplifies the strategic value of formulation patents in China’s dermatology sector. Its enforceability hinges on proactive litigation under the patent linkage system and careful prosecution to avoid disavowal. As China’s courts increasingly embrace global patent norms—such as admitting post-filing data—the patent’s longevity will depend on continuous innovation and adaptive legal strategies.

References

  1. https://www.kwm.com/cn/en/insights/latest-thinking/case-analysis-on-patent-protection-on-pharmacies.html
  2. https://www.finnegan.com/a/web/pGLT6gAS19afwhXmFGbHeg/published-thomson-reuters-westlaw-today-comparative-overview-of-drug-patent-linkage-systems-in-china-and-the-united-states-lf-yd-050421.pdf
  3. https://curity.io/resources/learn/scopes-claims-and-the-client/
  4. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/series/index.jsp?id=137
  5. https://chinapatentstrategy.com/beijing-ip-court-reverses-cnipas-decision-accepting-novo-nordisks-post-filing-data-upholding-the-ozempic-semaglutide-patent-in-china-as-valid/
  6. https://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/hcv_tb_longacting_patent_trends.pdf
  7. https://curity.io/resources/learn/scopes-vs-claims/
  8. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN102438590B/zh
  9. https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2020/china/chinese-patent-linkage-system---the-chinese-supreme-court-issues-draft-judicial-interpretations
  10. https://chinapatentstrategy.com/a-more-detailed-overview-of-chinas-patent-term-extension-pte-system/
  11. https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2022/7/china-on-the-move-proposed-pharmaceutical-regulations--reform-regulatory-landscape
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34152217/
  13. https://natlawreview.com/article/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-drug-patent-reverse-payment-agreements-may-violate
  14. https://bricsandbeyond.blog/tag/china/
  15. https://www.nutter.com/ip-law-bulletin/drafting-patent-applications-to-avoid-claim-scope-disavowal-issues
  16. https://klarquist.com/patent-defenses/how-construed/
  17. https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2231/2025-03-14-federal-circuit-affirms-ptabs-analysis-finding-product
Last updated: 2025-04-19

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.