You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2015000715


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2015000715

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,849,888 Sep 23, 2033 Janssen Biotech ERLEADA apalutamide
9,884,054 Sep 23, 2033 Janssen Biotech ERLEADA apalutamide
RE49353 Sep 23, 2033 Janssen Biotech ERLEADA apalutamide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Chile Patent CL2015000715

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Chile Patent CL2015000715, granted in 2015, relates to a pharmaceutical invention aiming at protecting a specific drug formulation or process. To understand its strategic value within the patent landscape, an in-depth analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent environment in Chile for drugs is necessary. This review contextualizes the patent’s strength, territorial coverage, and potential for licensing or litigation.


Scope of Patent CL2015000715

The patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries for protection. Although the full text is essential for detailed evaluation, the general scope can be inferred as encompassing a specific drug formulation, manufacturing process, or therapeutic use, depending on the patent’s description.

Given typical pharmaceutical patent structures in Chile, this patent likely covers:

  • A novel pharmaceutical composition, including specific excipients, ratios, or delivery mechanisms.
  • A unique manufacturing process that improves yield, purity, or stability.
  • Therapeutic methods utilizing the formulation for particular indications.

The scope's breadth hinges on language specificity; broader claims risk invalidation or challenge, while narrow claims may limit enforceability. Notably, Chile’s patent law permits claims covering devices, methods, compositions, and uses, provided they meet patentability standards.

Legal Considerations

Chile’s patent law, aligned with TRIPS standards, requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The claims must be sufficiently clear and supported by the description. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, especially if prior art exists. Conversely, precise claims yield stronger protection but may allow competitors to design around.


Claims Analysis

While the exact wording of CL2015000715 claims is necessary for a comprehensive assessment, common claim types in pharmaceutical patents include:

  1. Composition Claims:

    • Covering a specific combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with predetermined excipients and their ratios.
  2. Method of Manufacturing:

    • Detailing steps that produce the drug with improved properties, such as controlled release or enhanced bioavailability.
  3. Use Claims:

    • Protection for therapeutic applications—e.g., treating a particular disease with the formulation.
  4. Device Claims:

    • For drug delivery systems, such as patches or inhalers.

Defensive and Strategic Claims

The patent likely incorporates dependent claims to specify particular embodiments, shielding core claims against invalidation. For example, claims may specify:

  • The chemical structure and purity of active ingredients.
  • Specific dosage forms (tablets, capsules).
  • Administration protocols.

Potential Weaknesses

The strength hinges on:

  • The novelty of the claimed formulation or process. If similar formulations exist in prior art or other jurisdictions, validity may be challenged.
  • The clarity and definitive nature of claims; overly broad claims risk being invalidated or circumvented.

Opportunities for Opponents

If prior art patents or publications in Chile or abroad disclose similar compositions or methods, the enforceability could be compromised locally. The availability of prior patents in international patent databases should be examined to assess the scope of potential infringement or invalidation risks.


Patent Landscape in Chile for Drug Patents

Chile’s patent environment reflects a mature but smaller pharmaceutical patent landscape driven largely by local policy and market size. Nevertheless, the following factors shape this landscape:

  1. Patent Filings in Pharmaceuticals

    Chile follows the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) procedures, allowing applicants from around the world to seek protection. However, the volume remains relatively modest compared to major markets, concentrated on innovative drugs and formulations.

  2. Key Patent Applicants

    Multinational pharmaceutical companies and local firms engage actively, with notable filings in biologics, generics, and compound patents. The landscape is characterized by strategic patenting around both active ingredients and delivery mechanisms.

  3. Legal and Regulatory Environment

    Chile’s patent law, aligned with international standards, provides a solid framework. Nonetheless, the Chilean patent office's examination process emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with some criticism regarding the thoroughness of prior art searches.

  4. Patent Challenges and Litigation

    Patent challenges are relatively infrequent but increasing. Judicial and administrative proceedings have targeted patent validity, especially in the context of patent linkage and drug commercialization.

  5. Trade-offs in Patent Strategy

    Patents on drug formulations or methods tend to have narrower scopes but are more defensible. Broader claims risk invalidation but provide wider protection, influencing licensing and litigation strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Should analyze claim language critically, consider potential prior art, and strategize filings to maximize enforceability and scope.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Must monitor patent claims for potential infringements and design around strategies, especially considering the narrow scope typical in pharmaceutical patents.

  • Legal Practitioners: Need to carefully interpret claims and assess validity based on Chilean and international prior art, considering local and regional patent laws.


Conclusion

Chile Patent CL2015000715 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent with a scope limited by specific claims concerning formulation or manufacturing. Its strength relies on the originality and clarity of its claims, with enforceability contingent on prior art and the legal interpretation within Chile’s patent system. The Chilean pharmaceutical patent landscape, while smaller than other jurisdictions, remains active, with strategic patenting critical for market and innovation protection.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim specificity is crucial: Precise, well-supported claims bolster enforceability under Chilean law.
  • Prior art awareness: patentees must conduct thorough searches to avoid invalidation.
  • Landscape considerations: Chile’s patent environment favors targeted, inventive formulations over overly broad claims.
  • Strategic positioning: Innovators should leverage Chilean patent law’s alignment with international standards but remain vigilant about potential legal challenges.
  • Global relevance: Patent strategies in Chile complement broader regional and international IP protections, essential for pharmaceutical companies operating in Latin America.

FAQs

1. What are the primary factors determining the validity of a pharmaceutical patent in Chile?
Validity depends on novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and compliance with formal requirements, assessed through prior art searches and legal interpretation within Chilean Patent Law.

2. Can pharmaceutical patents filed in Chile be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Patent opposition or invalidation proceedings are possible through administrative or judicial channels, especially if prior art or claims are found to be invalid.

3. How does Chile’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent claims?
Chile’s patent law emphasizes precise claims with clear boundaries, discouraging overly broad or vague language, and requires compliance with international standards like TRIPS.

4. Are method-of-use patents common in Chile’s pharmaceutical landscape?
While less prevalent than composition patents, method-of-use claims are recognized and can provide valuable protection, particularly for new therapeutic applications.

5. How does Chile compare with other countries regarding drug patent landscape and protection?
Chile’s IP environment is comparable to other Latin American nations, with a solid legal framework but a smaller volume of filings. It emphasizes localized examination and strategic patenting to protect pharmaceutical innovations.


References
[1] Chilean Industrial Property Law, Law No. 19,039.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Chile patent landscape insights.
[3] Chilean Patent Office (INAPI), Patent examination standards and procedures.
[4] International Patent Classification (IPC), classifications relevant to pharmaceuticals.


This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the scope, claims, and patent landscape relevant to Chile patent CL2015000715, enabling stakeholders to make informed intellectual property and commercial decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.