You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Chile Patent: 2012000694


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Chile Patent: 2012000694

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 21, 2030 Abbvie TEFLARO ceftaroline fosamil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Chile Drug Patent CL2012000694

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Chile patent CL2012000694 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Patent analysis aids stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors—in understanding the scope, enforceability, and strategic positioning of the patent within the global landscape. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s scope and claims, situates it within the broader Chilean and international patent environments, and evaluates potential implications and opportunities.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: CL2012000694
  • Publication Date: 2012 (assuming based on patent number pattern, but specific date should be verified via Chile Patent Office or official database)
  • Filing Date: Precise filing date is critical but not provided here. This impacts the patent’s expiration and prior art considerations.
  • Applicant/Owner: Data not furnished here; confirming patent owner is advisable for enforcement and licensing analysis.
  • Invention Title: Typically relates to a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of treatment—details required for precise scope evaluation.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Nature of Claims

The scope of a patent hinges on its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. Claims can be categorized as:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, or biological entities.
  • Method Claims: Cover specific methods of preparing, administering, or using the drug.
  • Use Claims: Cover novel indications or therapeutic applications.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents, CL2012000694 likely includes a combination of these claim types, potentially focusing on a novel compound or specific use.

2. Claim Language and Breadth

Without the exact text, general principles apply:

  • Broad claims encompass a wide range of compounds or uses, providing extensive protection but potentially more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art emerges.
  • Dependent claims narrow claims to specific embodiments or formulations, strengthening the enforceability for particular product variants.

A typical pharmaceutical patent aims for a balance: broad claims to secure extensive coverage and narrower claims for enforceability over specific formulations or indications.

3. Claim Specificity

  • If the patent claims a novel chemical entity, the scope likely centers on its structure, synthesis method, and specific pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Method claims might specify a particular dosing regimen, combination therapy, or delivery system.
  • Use claims would define specific diseases or indications the drug addresses.

4. Potential Limitations

  • Overly broad claims risk rejection or invalidation if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.
  • Compound claims that depend on specific structural features must be clearly delineated to avoid ambiguity.

5. Considerations of Novelty and Inventive Step

The novelty of the patent depends on whether the claimed compound or method was previously disclosed. The inventive step requires demonstrating non-obviousness over existing medications and prior art, which could include:

  • Previously approved drugs with similar chemical backbones.
  • Known formulations or therapeutic methods.

In Chile, patentability aligns largely with international standards, requiring a novel, inventive, and industrially applicable invention (per Law 19.039).


Patent Landscape in Chile

1. Chile’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Chile conforms to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), enforcing patent rights for pharmaceuticals, with certain exceptions under health provisions. Patents are generally granted for 20 years from the filing date.

2. Key Competitors and Patent Filings

Chile's pharmaceutical landscape features:

  • Domestic companies innovating in certain therapeutic areas.
  • Foreign entities leveraging regional patent portfolios.

The landscape includes patents for blockbuster drugs, generics, and biosimilars, with recent trends reflecting increased filings for biologics and combination therapies.

3. Patent Clusters

  • Patents often cluster around chemical classes like statins, antivirals, or oncology agents.
  • The patent in question might be part of a strategic cluster, especially if it covers a new chemical entity or a novel combination.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation Trends

Legally, patent challenges might stem from:

  • Cl antivb prior art—challenging novelty.
  • Obviousness arguments—questioning inventive step.

While Chile's patent enforcement mechanisms are evolving, patent validity remains a significant focus for litigants.


Strategic Implications

1. Patent Enforcement and Commercialization

  • Owners should assess patent claims' breadth for market exclusivity.
  • Narrower claims offer strong enforceability but limited scope; broader claims provide market control at the cost of higher legal risk.

2. Patent Life and Lifecycle Management

  • Given the typical 20-year term, timely extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or patent term adjustments could be relevant.

3. Opportunities for Patent Expansion

  • Filing additional divisional or continuation applications could extend patent coverage.
  • Developing claims around formulations, methods of administration, or new therapeutic uses enhances portfolio robustness.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Summary

Patent CL2012000694 appears to encompass a pharmaceutical invention with claims likely centered on a chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic application. Its scope determines enforceability and strategic value within Chile’s patent environment. Given the importance of precise claim language, patent owners should monitor potential infringements and consider complementary filings to safeguard market position.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Leverage the patent’s scope for exclusive commercialization in Chile, considering potential for extending protection and defending against generic challenges.
  • Legal Professionals: Analyze claim language in patent litigation or licensing negotiations, assessing validity and enforceability risks.
  • Investors: Evaluate the patent as a strategic asset, forecasting market exclusivity duration and potential licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  1. Precise Claim Structuring Is Critical: Broader claims maximize market coverage but attract greater legal scrutiny; narrower claims are easier to defend and enforce.

  2. Patent Landscape Awareness: Chile’s patent environment favors innovation with sufficient legal safeguards; understanding existing clusters aids strategic planning.

  3. Protection Duration and Lifecycle Management: Patent lifespan considerations include potential extensions and patent family development to maintain market exclusivity.

  4. Monitoring and Enforcement: Vigilant observation of competitors’ filings and market activities is vital for enforcement and mitigating patent risks.

  5. Complementary Strategies: Combining patent filings with regulatory data, trademarks, and market exclusivity periods enhances overall patent portfolio strength.


FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like CL2012000694 in Chile?
Pharmaceutical patents typically cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, or methods of use. The scope depends on claim language, with the potential for broad compound claims or narrower method claims. Precise claims determine enforceability and market exclusivity.

2. How does Chile’s patent law affect the enforceability of this patent?
Chile aligns with TRIPS standards, granting 20-year rights from the filing date. Patents must demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Enforcement involves judicial actions against infringements, with validity challenged via prior art or obviousness.

3. Can this patent block generic drug entry in Chile?
Yes, if the patent claims are valid and encompass the marketed product or method, it can prevent generic entry during the patent term. However, narrow claims or invalidation proceedings can weaken the patent’s protective scope.

4. How does the patent landscape influence strategic development in Chile?
Understanding existing patents avoids infringement, guides innovation around competitive IP, and informs licensing or partnership strategies. Patents clustered around certain chemical classes or indications indicate areas of active competition.

5. What are key considerations for extending the patent's lifespan or expanding its scope?
Filing divisional applications, pursuing supplementary protection certificates, or obtaining patents for secondary indications or formulations can prolong or broaden legal protection, maintaining market exclusivity.


References

[1] Chilean Patent Law (Law No. 19.039).
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports for Chile.
[3] Chile Patent Office (INAPI). Public Patent Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.