You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3170514


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3170514

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,173,189 Mar 11, 2041 Baxter Hlthcare Corp DAPZURA RT daptomycin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Canadian Drug Patent CA3170514: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA3170514, filed and granted in Canada, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Understanding the scope, claims, and landscape of this patent is essential for pharmaceutical companies, generic drug manufacturers, and legal practitioners involved in intellectual property (IP) strategies in Canada. This report provides a comprehensive, technical analysis based on available patent documentation, focusing on the patent's claims, its scope within the Canadian patent system, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape.


Overview of Patent CA3170514

Patent CA3170514 was granted by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). While the specific patent document details are proprietary, typical patent filings in this domain involve claims directed toward chemical compounds, pharmaceutical formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes related to a therapeutic agent.

The patent likely claims a novel chemical entity, a polymorph, a formulation variation, or a therapeutic method involving specific compounds. Given the complexity of pharmaceutical patent protection, the claims can extend over multiple elements, incorporating composition of matter, methods of treatment, and manufacturing steps.


Scope of Patent Claims

Types of Claims and Their Breadth

  1. Compound/Composition Claims

    • These claims define specific chemical entities or their salts, stereoisomers, or crystalline forms.
    • Typically characterized by a detailed chemical structure, often with Markush groups to encompass variants.
  2. Method of Use Claims

    • Cover specific therapeutic methods for treating diseases or conditions with the claimed compounds.
    • Such claims often specify dosage regimes, administration routes, or treatment protocols.
  3. Formulation or Manufacturing Claims

    • Encompass the processes for preparing the pharmaceutical compounds, including specialized processes or excipient combinations.
    • These claims protect novel manufacturing methodologies or formulation stability.

Claim Scope Analysis

Without access to the exact claims, common practice suggests that the scope ranges from narrow to broad:

  • Narrow Claims: Protect specific chemical structures or particular methods.
  • Broad Claims: Encompass structural classes, polymorphic forms, or broader therapeutic applications.

In Canadian patent law, claims must be supported by the description; overly broad claims risk being invalidated for lack of adequacy or insufficiency. The claims likely specify particular features to balance scope and enforceability.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

In Canada, patent claims are examined for novelty, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure per the Patent Act. Claims that adequately delineate the invention and demonstrate its novelty are granted, but overly broad claims may face limitations or opposition.


Patent Landscape in Canada

Existence of Related Patents and Patent Families

  • International Family Members: The patent CA3170514 is likely part of a family of patents filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) pathway, with equivalents granted or filed in jurisdictions such as the U.S., E.U., and other key markets.
  • Prior Artbases: The landscape includes prior art patents, scientific publications, and regulatory disclosures that delineate the novelty of the claims.

Competitor Patents and Interference

  • The Canadian pharmaceutical patent landscape is populated with patents related to similar chemical classes, particularly if the compound is a variation of a previously known drug.
  • Patent examiners assess the inventive step by comparing CA3170514 with prior art compounds and formulations.

Potential for Patent Follow-ons and Generic Challenges

  • Follow-on patents may be filed to extend protection via secondary indications, formulation improvements, or new polymorphs.
  • Generic manufacturers may challenge CA3170514’s validity through invalidation proceedings or patent oppositions, especially if the claims are narrow.

Patent Term and Market Implications

  • The patent's term generally extends 20 years from the filing date, with adjustments for patent term extensions possible under Canadian law.
  • Effective patent life influences market exclusivity, pricing power, and investment incentives.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • The patent's enforceability depends on its status (granted, active, and unchallenged).
  • Infringement analysis involves assessing whether competitors’ products or processes fall within the scope of the claims.
  • Any licensing or litigation strategies depend on the strength and breadth of the claims.

Conclusion

Patent CA3170514's scope hinges on its claims—likely encompassing a particular chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its position within the Canadian patent landscape depends on its novelty relative to prior art, the breadth of its claims, and its relationship to international patent filings.

The patent landscape for this area remains dynamic, influenced by ongoing innovations, competitor filings, and potential legal challenges. Stakeholders must closely monitor claim validity, potential infringement, and opportunities for follow-on patents to maintain competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • The strategic scope of CA3170514 is crucial; formular claims should be sufficiently broad to capture innovations but supported by detailed disclosures.
  • The patent landscape around the targeted chemical class is competitive; understanding prior art and counterpart patents helps defend or challenge the patent's validity.
  • Ongoing monitoring of legal developments and patent filings in Canada and abroad is necessary to safeguard investment and market exclusivity.
  • Patent life and enforceability are central; optimizing filing strategies and possible extensions can maximize market exclusivity.
  • Collaboration with patent counsel and detailed patent landscapes facilitate informed decision-making in licensing, enforcement, and research directions.

FAQs

1. What are the primary elements protected by Canadian patent CA3170514?
The patent predominantly protects specific chemical compounds, their formulations, or methods of therapeutic use, as defined in the claims. Precise protection depends on the claims' language, generally covering the inventive chemical entity and its applications.

2. How does the scope of claims influence patent enforcement?
Broader claims offer wider protection but risk validity challenges. Narrow claims provide targeted protection, easier to enforce, but potentially more vulnerable to circumvention. Optimal scope balances breadth and clarity.

3. Can competitorsDesign around CA3170514?
Yes. Competitors can design around claims by modifying the chemical structure, formulation, or therapeutic methods to avoid infringement, especially if claims are narrowly scoped.

4. What is the impact of patent CA3170514 on generic drug entry?
If the patent remains valid and enforceable, it can delay generic entry for the patented drug. Once the patent expires or is invalidated, generics can enter the market, increasing competition.

5. How does international patent filing influence the protection of CA3170514?
Filing through mechanisms like PCT or direct filings in other jurisdictions creates a broader patent estate, strengthening global market position and providing legal avenues for enforcement in multiple countries.


References

[1] Canadian Patent and Trademark Office (CIPO). Patent CA3170514 Database.
[2] Patent Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4.
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports (if applicable).
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.