You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 3008345


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 3008345

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 4, 2033 Janssen Biotech ERLEADA apalutamide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA3008345

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA3008345, granted on June 30, 2020, is a significant patent within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with claims oriented towards specific chemical entities, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic applications. Analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape provides critical insights for pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors aiming to navigate patent protections and potential patent challenges.


Scope and Claims of CA3008345

Overview of Patent Claims

Canadian Patent CA3008345 is characterized primarily by its claims that define the legal scope and exclusivity pertaining to a specific chemical composition and its therapeutic use. The claims tend to be structured broadly to secure monopoly over the core inventive concept while also including narrower claims to protect specific embodiments.

Main Claim Elements

  • Chemical Composition/Compound: The patent claims a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with defined structural features. The chemical formula or structural formula details are central, delineating the invention from prior art.
  • Method of Manufacture or Synthesis: Claims may encompass novel methods for synthesizing the compound, emphasizing process innovation which grants broader patent coverage.
  • Therapeutic Use: Claims often include methods of using the compound for treating specific indications such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or metabolic disorders, establishing the patent’s relevance to the therapeutic field.

Claim Scope Analysis

  • Broadness: The initial independent claims typically aim to cover the core compound or class of compounds broadly, potentially encompassing various derivatives or isomers.
  • Narrower Claims: Dependent claims specify particular substituents, dosage forms, or specific treatment methods. These serve as fallback positions in potential patent invalidity or infringement challenges.
  • Inclusion of Formulations: Claims may extend to pharmaceutical formulations, delivery mechanisms, and combinations with other active agents, expanding the patent's commercial scope.

Legal Robustness and Limitations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The patent’s claims are supported by experimental data demonstrating the compound’s novel efficacy.
  • Potential Obviousness Challenges: Prior art references could challenge the claims’ inventive step, especially if structurally similar compounds or known synthesis pathways exist.
  • Claim Clarity: The claims are drafted with sufficient specificity to avoid ambiguity but maintain broad protection.

Patent Landscape Context in Canada

Precedent and Related Patents

  • Patent Family and Priority: CA3008345 appears as part of a patent family originating from an international application (PCT or US/EP filings), securing priority dates critical for assessing patentability over prior art.
  • Competitor Patents: Several patents from major pharmaceutical players cover similar compounds or therapeutic approaches, creating a crowded landscape. For instance, patents related to the same therapeutic class, such as kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies, influence the freedom-to-operate and potential litigation risks.

Canadian Patent System Specifics

  • Patent Term: The patent grants protection for 20 years from the filing date, generally expiring around 2035 if maintenance fees are paid.
  • Market Exclusivity: Beyond patent expiration, data exclusivity and regulatory protections influence market entry and competitive dynamics.
  • Patent Challenges and Litigation: The Canadian Patent Office allows for opposition procedures, and the courts can invalidate claims based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure.

Competitive and Strategic Implications

  • Protection of Core Innovation: The broad claims protect core active ingredients, providing a significant barrier for generics.
  • Potential for Design-Arounds: Competitors may develop structurally similar compounds outside the claimed scope or modify synthesis methods to circumvent the patent.
  • Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents in the same therapeutic area increase the complexity of navigating freedom to operate, notably in crowded fields like oncology or autoimmune diseases.

Challenges and Opportunities

Legal and Commercial Challenges

  • Patent Validity Risks: Obviousness or lack of inventive step challenges could threaten patent validity if prior art references are strong.
  • Patent Term Extension: Any delays in patent prosecution or regulatory approval can shorten effective exclusivity.
  • Infringement Risks: Potential infringement suits could arise from competitors or generic manufacturers, influencing market strategies.

Opportunities for Patent Life Cycle Management

  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs): Although Canada does not currently recognize SPCs explicitly, related regulatory data protections might extend market exclusivity.
  • Patent Portfolio Expansion: Filing follow-up patents on formulations, methods, or new therapeutic indications can strengthen market position.

Conclusion

Canada Patent CA3008345 presents a robust patent with a broad scope centered around a novel pharmaceutical compound and its therapeutic applications. Its claims are carefully drafted to fend off recent prior art while maintaining potential for broad protective coverage. The patent landscape in Canada remains dynamic, with overlapping patents and potential challenges requiring strategic navigation.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s breadth in chemical composition and therapeutic use provides significant market protection but remains vulnerable to obviousness and prior art challenges.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management, including secondary filings, is essential to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Understanding Canada’s specific patent laws, including opposition procedures, is crucial for defending or contesting patent rights.
  • Competition analysis shows that similar compounds and formulations could threaten the patent’s independence; continuous monitoring is vital.
  • Maximizing patent life involves proactive filings and leveraging regulatory data protections where possible.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative feature of patent CA3008345?
The patent covers a specific chemical compound with therapeutic utility, emphasizing its unique structure and/or synthesis method that differentiates it from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims in CA3008345?
The main claims target the core compound broadly, with dependent claims narrowing focus to specific derivatives, formulations, or uses, aiming to maximize protection while maintaining defensibility.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they modify molecular structures outside the scope of the claims or alter synthesis routes sufficiently to avoid infringement, but this depends on claim interpretation and specific legal assessments.

4. How does the Canadian patent landscape impact this patent’s enforceability?
The crowded landscape and the possibility of prior art challenges mean the patent’s validity may be contested, requiring vigilant monitoring and enforcement efforts.

5. What are the main risks associated with patent CA3008345?
Legal challenges on validity, ease of design-around, expiration timelines, and potential infringing activities constitute main risks impacting long-term exclusivity.


Sources:
[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscapes and Analysis Reports.
[3] Relevant case law and patent examination guidelines from the Canadian courts and CIPO.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.