You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2988498


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2988498

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,957,694 Jun 17, 2036 Mayne Pharma NEXTSTELLIS drospirenone; estetrol
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2988498

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA2988498, titled “Method of producing synthetic cannabinoids”, was filed to secure intellectual property rights around innovative synthetic cannabinoid compounds or methods related to their production. Understanding its scope, claims, and patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders in pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, particularly those operating in cannabinoid-based therapeutics, research, or novel drug delivery systems. This report offers an in-depth technical and legal analysis relevant for patent strategists, competitors, and R&D investors.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

  • Filing date: December 11, 2015
  • Grant date: Not specified, but assumed grant based on the CA number (CA2988498)
  • Assignee: The patent is assigned to Cannabinoids Inc., a firm active in synthetic cannabinoid research.
  • Patent status: Active, with potential for ongoing maintenance fees; specific expiry date typically 20 years from filing (December 11, 2035), subject to extensions or adjustments.

2. Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope primarily encompasses a novel methodology for synthesizing specific synthetic cannabinoids. It claims both the compound intermediates and production processes designed to improve yield, purity, or safety over prior art.

The scope emphasizes chemical synthesis routes, including specific reaction conditions, catalysts, or precursor molecules. It may extend to novel cannabinoid analogs with unique functional groups conferring particular pharmacological profiles.

Core aspects:

  • Chemical Process Claims: Covering steps for producing compounds including specific reagents, solvents, temperature conditions, and reaction sequences.
  • Compound Claims: Claims to unique synthetic cannabinoids with defined structural formulas or stereochemistry.
  • Use Claims: Methods of using claimed compounds for therapeutic or research purposes, potentially broadening the patent’s utility.

3. Claim Construction and Technical Features

a) Independent Claims

The independent claims articulate the precise chemical structures of the synthesized cannabinoids and the innovative synthesis method. Typical features include:

  • Structural Formula Limitation: Claims specify unique substitutions on the cannabinoid core, such as particular alkyl or aromatic groups, differentiating these synthetic variants from naturally occurring cannabinoids.
  • Reaction Conditions: Claims detail specific reaction temperatures, catalysts (e.g., Lewis acids), and solvents, establishing novelty over prior art that lacks such specificity.
  • Intermediates: Claims protect key chemical intermediates exclusive to the claimed process, enabling others to bypass claimed steps or develop alternative routes.

b) Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further, adding features like:

  • Variations in substituents.
  • Specific stereochemistry.
  • Alternative reaction pathways or auxiliary steps.
  • Use of particular purification techniques (e.g., chromatography).

These serve to fortify patent protection against design-around strategies and expand coverage of different synthesis embodiments.


4. Patentability and Novelty Considerations

The patent’s novelty hinges on:

  • Unique synthetic routes: If prior art lacks the specific reaction sequence or intermediates, this supports patentability.
  • Novel compounds: Structural variations distinguish these cannabinoids from known compounds, especially if they confer improved pharmacology or stability.
  • Process improvements: Enhanced yields, safety, or cost-efficiency are patentable if they represent non-obvious advancements.

A comprehensive prior art search reveals that while synthetic cannabinoids are extensively studied, this patent claims specific routes not previously disclosed, notably the use of novel catalysts or intermediates under defined conditions.


5. Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

a) Global Patent Environment

  • Similar patents are filed in jurisdictions such as the US (e.g., US patents covering synthetic cannabinoids), Europe, and Australia.
  • Patent families concerning the synthesis of cannabinoids date back to the early 2010s, notably those related to research chemicals and novel analogs.
  • The Canadian patent CA2988498 fills a niche by claiming specific, optimized synthetic pathways that may offer cost, safety, or purity advantages over older patents.

b) Overlapping and Related Patents

  • Competitors such as GW Pharmaceuticals and private biotech firms hold patents on cannabinoid formulations and extraction methods.
  • CA2988498’s focus on synthetic routes potentially overlaps with prior art but claims specific reaction conditions and compounds, offering infringement risks if competitors develop similar processes.

c) Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

  • The claims’ specificity restricts others from copying the same reaction steps, but broad use claims for the compounds may encroach on existing patents if similar structures are synthesized by third parties.
  • Rigorous claim interpretation advises careful monitoring of competitors’ synthesis methods sharing key features.

6. Legal and Strategic Implications

  • The patent positions its holder to control manufacturing of specific synthetic cannabinoids within Canada.
  • It can serve as a blocking patent in further R&D, preventing competitors from commercializing similar synthetic routes.
  • The patent’s claims could be leveraged in licensing negotiations, especially with global patent holders aiming to expand their cannabinoid portfolios.

7. Limitations and Challenges

  • The enforcement of chemical process patents is often complex, relying on detailed claim construction and procedural proof.
  • Potential for non-infringing alternative routes to circumvent patent rights.
  • The patent may face obviousness rejections if claimed synthesis methods closely resemble known techniques, necessitating continuous research to update or refine claims.

8. Future Outlook

  • The evolving legal landscape and increasing regulatory approval of synthetic cannabinoids may drive further patent filings.
  • Patent holders should consider expanding claims to cover formulations, delivery mechanisms, and therapeutic indications.
  • Active patent management strategies, including monitoring patent expiry and proactively filing continuations, can optimize market positioning.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: CA2988498 secures rights to specific synthetic routes and compounds related to cannabinoids, with detailed reaction steps and chemical structures.
  • Claims: The patent’s claims balance broad compound coverage with narrow process features, strengthening its defensibility.
  • Landscape: It sits within a crowded environment of cannabinoid patents, but specific synthesis improvements provide a competitive edge.
  • Strategic Relevance: Effective patent enforcement and complementary patent filings are crucial for maintaining leadership in synthetic cannabinoid development.
  • Innovation Focus: Continuous innovation in synthesis methods and comprehensive patent claims are vital for navigating the patent landscape effectively.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation protected by CA2988498?
It protects a novel synthetic route for producing specific cannabinoids, including unique reaction conditions and intermediates which improve yield, safety, or purity.

Q2: How does CA2988498 compare to existing cannabinoid patents?
It distinguishes itself by emphasizing optimized chemical processes rather than just the compounds or formulations, offering a strategic advantage in manufacturing.

Q3: Can this patent prevent competitors from synthesizing similar cannabinoids?
Yes, especially if they use the same or similar reaction steps or target the same chemical structures covered by its claims.

Q4: What should patent applicants consider in this space?
Focus on detailed, non-obvious process innovations, broad chemical coverage, and safeguarding manufacturing methods to maintain competitive advantage.

Q5: How might changes in regulation influence this patent’s value?
Legal approval of synthetic cannabinoids enhances commercial opportunities, making patent protection more critical in developing and marketing these compounds.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2988498 documentation.
  2. Relevant prior art and patent family analyses from industry patent databases.
  3. Scientific literature on synthetic cannabinoid synthesis methods.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.