You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 11, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2906472


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2906472

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,188,632 Mar 14, 2033 Abbvie VIBERZI eluxadoline
11,007,179 Mar 14, 2033 Abbvie VIBERZI eluxadoline
11,090,291 Mar 14, 2033 Abbvie VIBERZI eluxadoline
11,160,792 Mar 14, 2033 Abbvie VIBERZI eluxadoline
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Canadian Drug Patent CA2906472: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: April 23, 2025

Overview of Patent CA2906472

Patent CA2906472 protects INVOKAMET XR, a fixed-dose combination therapy containing canagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor) and metformin hydrochloride (a biguanide) for managing type 2 diabetes[1][17]. The patent is set to expire on December 4, 2026, after which generic competitors may enter the Canadian market[1]. This analysis examines the patent’s scope, claim structure, and broader implications within Canada’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Scope and Claim Structure

Key Claims and Protected Subject Matter

Under Canada’s Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, CA2906472 is eligible for listing on the Patent Register as it contains claims relevant to:

  1. Formulation: The patent likely covers the specific ratio and pharmaceutical composition of canagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride in a sustained-release formulation[1][17].
  2. Dosage Form: Claims may specify the extended-release mechanism critical to INVOKAMET XR’s pharmacokinetic profile, distinguishing it from immediate-release formulations[2][17].
  3. Combination Therapy: The patent asserts claims over the synergistic use of canagliflozin and metformin, which together improve glycemic control while mitigating adverse effects like hypoglycemia[1][14].

Notably, the patent does not claim the individual active ingredients (canagliflozin or metformin), as these are protected by earlier-expiring compound patents[1][16]. Instead, CA2906472 exemplifies a secondary patent aimed at prolonging market exclusivity through formulation and dosage form innovations[14][16].


Claim Validity and Legal Challenges

The patent’s enforceability hinges on Canada’s purposive claim construction principles, which require courts to interpret claims based on the inventor’s intent and the understanding of a person skilled in the art[5][6]. Key considerations include:

  • Essential Elements: Claims specifying pH-dependent release mechanisms or excipient ratios may be deemed essential if they define the invention’s core functionality[6][7].
  • Overbreadth Risks: If claims encompass non-inventive variations (e.g., obvious formulation tweaks), the patent could face invalidation for lacking novelty or inventive step[7][18].
  • Double Patenting: CA2906472 must avoid overlapping with prior patents covering canagliflozin or metformin alone, as Canadian law prohibits double patenting for the same invention[3][7].

Litigation risks are heightened given INVOKAMET XR’s commercial significance. Generic manufacturers may challenge the patent via:

  • Section 6(1) Notices of Allegation: Arguing non-infringement or invalidity (e.g., obviousness)[2][18].
  • Invalidity Claims: Asserting that the formulation lacks inventiveness over prior art combining SGLT2 inhibitors with metformin[14][17].

Patent Landscape and Strategic Implications

Role in Janssen’s Patent Thicket

CA2906472 forms part of Janssen’s patent thicket strategy, which layers multiple patents around INVOKAMET XR to deter generics[1][16]. Alongside formulation patents, Janssen likely holds secondary patents covering:

  • Manufacturing Processes: Methods to stabilize the combination in extended-release matrices[1][17].
  • Dosing Regimens: Specific titration protocols to minimize gastrointestinal side effects[19].
  • Polymorphs: Crystalline forms of canagliflozin with improved bioavailability[17].

This multi-layered approach complicates generic entry, as competitors must invalidate or design around all relevant patents[1][14].


Market Impact Post-2026

The expiration of CA2906472 in 2026 will trigger significant market shifts:

  1. Generic Entry: Health Canada’s Abbreviated New Drug Submission pathway allows generics to reference INVOKAMET XR’s data, accelerating approval[2][18].
  2. Price Reductions: Historical data suggest a 60-80% price drop within two years of generic entry, saving healthcare systems ~$150 million annually[12][16].
  3. Biosimilar Dynamics: While INVOKAMET XR is a small-molecule drug, its patent cliff mirrors biosimilar trends, where formulation patents delay competition for biologics[16][18].

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

Canada’s evolving patent policies impact CA2906472’s lifecycle:

  • Excess Claims Fees: Amendments to the Patent Rules impose fees for applications with >20 claims, incentivizing concise drafting[3][4]. CA2906472’s use of multiply-dependent claims (counted as single claims) likely minimized costs while broadening protection[4][13].
  • Certificate of Supplementary Protection (CSP): If eligible, a CSP could extend protection by up to two years, though Janssen’s 2026 expiry suggests prior CSP utilization[17][18].
  • Post-Approval Patent Listing: Health Canada permits post-approval additions to the Patent Register for formulation or dosage form changes, a tactic Janssen may employ if reformulating INVOKAMET XR[17][18].

Comparative Analysis with U.S. and EU Practices

  • Claim Drafting: Unlike the U.S., Canada prohibits method-of-treatment claims, necessitating formulation-focused strategies[5][19]. The Federal Court’s rejection of the “problem-solution” approach in Benjamin Moore reinforces strict adherence to claim language[5][6].
  • Patent Term Adjustment: Canada lacks the U.S.’s patent term restoration (PTR) system, making secondary patents critical for recouping R&D investments[16][18].
  • Litigation Dynamics: Canada’s PM(NOC) Regulations enable faster resolution of patent disputes compared to the U.S. Hatch-Waxman framework, reducing pre-launch uncertainties[2][18].

Conclusion

Patent CA2906472 exemplifies the strategic use of secondary patents to extend market exclusivity for combination therapies. Its formulation and dosage form claims, while vulnerable to obviousness challenges, provide Janssen with a critical revenue stream until 2026. Post-expiry, generic competition will enhance accessibility but underscore the delicate balance between innovation incentives and public health imperatives. For policymakers, CA2906472 highlights the need for reforms addressing evergreening while preserving incentives for incremental innovations.


Key Takeaways

  1. CA2906472 protects INVOKAMET XR’s formulation and dosage form, expiring in 2026.
  2. Secondary patents are pivotal in Canada’s pharmaceutical strategy due to truncated market exclusivity.
  3. Generic entry post-2026 will reduce prices but necessitate rigorous patent litigation strategies.

FAQs

  1. What claims does CA2906472 protect?
    Formulation, dosage form, and combination therapy claims for canagliflozin/metformin.
  2. How does Canada’s claim construction affect CA2906472?
    Courts assess the inventor’s intent and essential elements, risking invalidation for overbreadth.
  3. Can Janssen extend CA2906472’s term?
    No, but post-approval patents for reformulated versions could be listed.
  4. What market changes are expected post-2026?
    Generic competition, price reductions, and increased patient access.
  5. How do Canada’s excess claim fees impact CA2906472?
    Multiply-dependent claims minimize fees while maximizing protection.

References

  1. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/p/generic-entry-opportunity-date/Canada
  2. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-93-133/Fulltext.html
  3. https://www.dickinson-wright.com/news-alerts/powell-chumak-canadian-patent-rules-claims-fees
  4. https://www.smartbiggar.ca/insights/publication/canada-s-new-claim-fee-rules-alternative-embodiments-within-a-single-claim
  5. https://www.dickinson-wright.com/news-alerts/powell-patent-claim-construction-decision
  6. https://www.mltaikins.com/insights/interpreting-claims-in-canadian-patent-law-purposive-construction-and-essential-elements/
  7. https://www.osler.com/en/insights/updates/overbroad-patent-claims-canadian-law-may-draw-strength-from-policy-behind-u-s-and-u-k-supreme-cou/
  8. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/patentscope
  9. https://patents.google.com
  10. https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2751.html
  11. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-circuit-reverses-decision-2488855/
  12. https://patentpc.com/blog/canadas-patent-landscape-key-statistics-and-trends/
  13. https://www.patenttrademarkblog.com/patent-claims/
  14. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0049470
  15. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-11090291-B2
  16. https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/what-happens-when-a-drug-patent-expires/
  17. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/applications-submissions/guidance-documents/patented-medicines/notice-compliance-regulations.html
  18. https://www.blg.com/en/insights/2021/12/regulatory-context-for-patented-pharmaceuticals-and-biotechnology-drugs-in-canada
  19. https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2021/canadian-patent-board-broadening-scope-claims

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.