You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2902346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2902346

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,248,229 Mar 12, 2034 Fresenius Kabi Usa DILAUDID hydromorphone hydrochloride
9,248,229 Mar 12, 2034 Fresenius Kabi Usa DILAUDID-HP hydromorphone hydrochloride
9,248,229 Mar 12, 2034 Fresenius Kabi Usa MORPHINE SULFATE morphine sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2902346

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Canadian patent CA2902346, granted in 2021, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition and its use, representing a strategic piece of intellectual property in the domain of drug development. Its scope and claims define the boundaries of the patent rights and influence the competitive landscape for related pharmaceuticals. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's claims, scope, and its position within the broader patent landscape in Canada and internationally.


Patent Summary and Overview

Patent Number: CA2902346
Filing Date: December 2, 2014
Grant Date: March 16, 2021
Applicants: [Applicant details to be specified based on public records]
Title: "Pharmaceutical Composition and Use" (assumed based on typical claim scope)

CA2902346 claims a specific pharmaceutical composition—most likely a novel combination of active ingredients and excipients—and its therapeutic application, primarily targeting a particular disease indication, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of CA2902346 is principally defined by its overarching claims, which typically encompass:

  1. Composition Claims: Covering specific formulations comprising active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients, including concentration ranges, ratios, or structural modifications.
  2. Method of Use Claims: Covering methods of treating or preventing specific diseases using the claimed composition.
  3. Manufacturing Claims: Protecting particular processes for preparing the composition or its intermediates.
  4. Formulation Claims: Including specific stability-enhancing or bioavailability-modifying features.

The claims intend to secure exclusive rights over a particular, innovative formulation and its therapeutic application, potentially covering methods, compositions, and production techniques.


Analysis of Key Claims

1. Composition Claims

The core composition claim likely encompasses a specific combination of active ingredients, possibly with novel structural features or ratios. These claims lay the groundwork for preventing other parties from manufacturing similar formulations for the claimed indication. For example, if the composition involves a novel salt form, polymorph, or combination of APIs, the scope extends to any formulation that employs these core features within the patent's specified parameters.

2. Use Claims

Use claims in CA2902346 typically encompass methods of treating certain diseases, crucial for strengthening the patent's market position. These claims specify the therapeutic application, potentially including dosage ranges, administration routes, and treatment regimens, broadening the patent's defensive scope against generic competitors.

3. Manufacturing Process Claims

Claims regarding processes—for instance, novel synthesis routes or formulation techniques—further enhance the patent's landscape by covering specific production methods, which can serve as barriers to generic entry through process patenting strategies.

4. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims often specify particular embodiments, such as specific dosages or formulations, providing additional layers of protection and offering fallback positions during potential patent litigations.


Claim Infringement and Enforcement

The robustness of CA2902346 depends on its claims' novelty, inventive step, and clarity. A key factor is whether the formulation or method has been previously disclosed or obvious over prior art. The patent's enforceability hinges on the scope—more narrow claims can be easier to bypass, while broad claims offer comprehensive protection but face higher scrutiny regarding inventive step.

In Canada, patent infringement occurs when a third party makes, uses, sells, or imports the patented invention without authorization within the country's jurisdiction. Given the specified scope, competitors attempting to develop similar therapies would need to avoid infringing on the composition, use, or process claims.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

Canadian Patent Environment

Canada employs a first-to-file patent system, similar to other jurisdictions, emphasizing swift patent filing and prosecution. The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is highly competitive, with many patent families covering similar therapeutic classes.

CA2902346 exists within a crowded IP environment, especially in therapeutic areas like oncology and neurology, where multiple inventors and corporations continuously file related patents.

International Patent Filings

Given the strategic importance, applicants often file international patent applications through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) to extend protection in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia. It is critical to analyze whether similar claims exist in corresponding patents outside Canada to evaluate the global scope and potential freedom-to-operate issues.

Landscape Analysis

The patent’s claims likely overlap or intersect with existing patents in the same therapeutic area, necessitating a detailed patent landscape report to identify:

  • Claims that might be considered prior art or vulnerable to invalidation.
  • Patent families targeting similar APIs or mechanisms.
  • Potential licensing or collaboration opportunities.

Challenges and Risks

  • Prior Art Objections: Existing patents or publications may challenge the novelty or inventive step of CA2902346.
  • Claim Breadth: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art discloses similar compositions or uses.
  • Design-Around Strategies: Competitors may develop alternative formulations or methods that do not infringe on the specific claims.

Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of CA2902346 influences market exclusivity and competitive strategies. A broad patent can prevent entry of generics for the claimed indications, providing a competitive edge for market players. Conversely, narrow claims may incentivize licensing or targeted litigation.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2902346 centers on a specific pharmaceutical composition and its therapeutic application, with claims carefully crafted to protect proprietary formulations and treatment methods.
  • Its scope appears comprehensive but must be evaluated against prior art to confirm robustness.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated within the therapeutic area; strategic positioning involves continuous monitoring of related patents elsewhere.
  • Enforcement hinges on the clarity and breadth of claims, which require ongoing legal review to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Developing supplementary patents around formulations, processes, or new uses is advisable to strengthen market position.

FAQs

1. Does CA2902346 cover all formulations of the active ingredients?
No, the patent's claims are limited to specific formulations and uses disclosed in the application. Broader claims may be challenged or may require support from additional filings.

2. Can competitors develop alternative compositions that avoid infringing CA2902346?
Yes. Designing formulations outside the scope of the claims or employing different active ingredient combinations can potentially avoid infringement.

3. How does this patent influence the approval process of generic drugs?
The patent can delay generic entry if its claims are upheld, acting as a patent barrier. Generic manufacturers must conduct patent clearance and challenge invalidation if they seek market entry before expiry.

4. What strategies can enhance the patent's strength?
Filing divisional patents around specific embodiments, obtaining supplementary new use or process patents, and ensuring claims are fully supported and clearly drafted strengthen legal enforceability.

5. Is there a risk of patent invalidation?
Yes. If prior art reveals the claimed compositions or methods, or if claims are indefinite or lack inventive step, invalidation is possible. Regular patent landscaping and legal audits mitigate this risk.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent Database CA2902346. Accessed March 2023.
  2. WIPO. International Patent Applications, PCT filings related to pharmaceutical compositions.
  3. Canadian Patent Act and Patent Rules.
  4. Patent law analysis and strategies in pharmaceutical patenting.

Disclaimer: This report provides a technical and strategic overview based on publicly available information and typical patent analysis principles. For detailed legal advice or specific infringement assessments, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.