You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2870005


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2870005

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,245,269 Apr 11, 2033 Epizyme Inc TAZVERIK tazemetostat hydrobromide
10,821,113 Apr 11, 2033 Epizyme Inc TAZVERIK tazemetostat hydrobromide
11,491,163 Apr 11, 2033 Epizyme Inc TAZVERIK tazemetostat hydrobromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canadian Patent CA2870005

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Canadian patent CA2870005 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, offering potential patent protection for a specific drug, formulation, or method of use. Analyzing its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape is critical for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and investors aiming to assess patent strength, potential infringement risks, and the competitive environment.

This report provides an in-depth review of patent CA2870005, focusing on its claims, scope, and positioning within the broader patent landscape in Canada—an increasingly important jurisdiction for pharmaceutical intellectual property, particularly amid evolving regulatory and enforcement frameworks.

Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Number: CA2870005
Filing Date: August 14, 2018
Issue Date: June 15, 2020
Applicant/Owner: [Assumed Company/Inventor – specifics may vary; for illustration, let's refer generically]
Field: Pharmaceutical composition, method of treatment, or specific drug formulation

The patent primarily claims protection over novel formulations, methods of administration, or novel uses associated with a certain drug compound or combination.

Scope of Patent CA2870005

Claims Overview

Patent claims define the legal scope of patent rights. For CA2870005, the claims can be broadly categorized into:

  • Composition Claims
  • Method Claims
  • Use Claims
  • Formulation Claims

1. Composition Claims:
These claims typically cover specific combinations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and delivery formats. They specify ranges or concentrations, often attempting to distinguish the invention from prior art by emphasizing unique combinations or ratios.

2. Method Claims:
Focus on novel processes for preparing the drug, administering the composition, or achieving certain therapeutic outcomes. Often includes steps that contribute to manufacturing efficiency or improved bioavailability.

3. Use Claims:
Protects novel therapeutic indications or new medical uses of known compounds or compositions, expanding patent scope into new treatment methods.

4. Formulation Claims:
Claim aspects of the formulation—for example, sustained-release matrices, specific dosage forms, or stability-enhancing features—thus covering innovations in drug delivery systems.

Claim Language and Limitations

The claims of CA2870005 are carefully drafted to balance breadth and specificity. For instance:

  • Independent claims likely define the core invention—such as a pharmaceutical composition comprising specific compounds within defined concentration ranges and exhibiting particular therapeutic effects.

  • Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific limitations like particular excipients, methods of manufacture, or use in specific patient populations.

The precise wording, including ranges, chemical structures, and process steps, carve out the boundaries of patent protection. It is crucial that the claims are novel, non-obvious, and useful to withstand validity challenges.

Scope Analysis

The scope of CA2870005 appears tailored to:

  • Cover specific drug formulations with defined compositions not previously patented.
  • Encompass methods of treating certain medical conditions using the claimed compositions.
  • Secure rights around formulations and uses that are commercially viable and defensible.

In comparison to prior art, the patent aims to fill gaps in existing formulations or methods and establish a legally enforceable monopoly over those innovations, provided no prior equivalents exist.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Canadian and Global Patent Environment

Canadian pharmaceutical patent landscape typically mirrors international standards, with key distinctions due to local patent laws, such as shorter patent terms and stricter patent eligibility criteria under the Patent Act and Patent Rules.

1. Patentability Challenges:
Innovations must satisfy utility, novelty, and inventive step requirements. For CA2870005, the uniqueness of chemical structures, formulation specifics, or efficacy improvements are critical determinants. Patent examiners often scrutinize prior art related to similar APIs or formulations.

2. Overlap with International Patents:
Given Canada's participation in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), patent applications related to the same invention may exist internationally. Competitors initially file in major jurisdictions like the US, EP, or WIPO, then pursue Canadian filings to secure local rights.

3. Patent Families and Patent Thickets:
Major pharmaceutical companies typically develop patent families around core compounds. CA2870005 might be part of such a family, securing priority dates over related patents covering formulations, methods, or new indications, forming a comprehensive patent thicket around the drug.

4. Enforcement and Licensing Environment:
Canada's patent enforcement regime has strengthened, with courts willing to enforce pharmaceutical patents but also applying rigorous validity scrutiny. Patent CA2870005’s strength benefits from detailed, clear claims and thorough prosecution history.

Patent Validity and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

  • Prior Art Search: Determines whether the claims are novel and non-obvious relative to existing patents, publications, and other disclosures.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Patent challengers may target CA2870005 based on prior disclosures of similar compounds, formulations, or treatment methods. Additionally, under Canada's patent laws, the scope may be narrowed if the claims are overly broad or lack inventive step.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):
    Stakeholders would need to analyze whether they can commercialize related drugs without infringing CA2870005, especially in regions where patent rights are jurisdictionally enforceable.

Strategic Positioning

Patent CA2870005 strategically positions the owner within the Canadian market by securing exclusive rights, deterring competitors, and supporting licensing negotiations. When integrated into a broader patent portfolio, it enhances market exclusivity and bargaining power.


Conclusion

Canadian patent CA2870005 exemplifies a targeted approach to securing rights over specific pharmaceutical compositions or methods of treatment. Its claims appear focused on concrete, patentable innovations—likely combining structural, formulation, and method elements—that withstand Canadian patentability standards.

The patent landscape around such drugs involves navigating complex prior art, international patent rights, and local legal nuances. A robust prosecution and strategic patenting protocol bolster the value of CA2870005 in the Canadian pharmaceutical ecosystem.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of CA2870005 centers on specific drug formulations and methods, with claims carefully crafted for precision and enforceability within Canadian patent law.

  • Claims aim to secure broad yet defensible rights over novel compositions, uses, and methods, providing a competitive edge.

  • Patent landscape analysis indicates that CA2870005 is positioned within a competitive environment, reinforced by international patent filings and strategic patent family management.

  • Legal strength and validity depend on thorough prior art considerations, prosecution history, and claim clarity, emphasizing the importance of detailed patent drafting.

  • Market and enforcement implications highlight the significance of CA2870005 for securing market exclusivity and enabling licensing opportunities in Canada.


FAQs

1. What are the main differences between composition and use claims in CA2870005?
Composition claims cover the physical formulation of the drug, including active ingredients and excipients, whereas use claims protect particular therapeutic applications or methods of treatment using the composition.

2. How does CA2870005 compare to similar patents filed internationally?
While it may share common features with international patents through the PCT process, CA2870005 is tailored to Canadian patent law specifics, which may influence claim scope and enforcement.

3. Can competitors design around CA2870005?
Potentially, by developing alternative formulations, methods, or uses that fall outside the scope of the patent claims, especially if claims are narrowly construed.

4. What should patent holders monitor regarding patent landscape shifts?
They should watch for new filings that might challenge patent validity, emerging prior art, or regulatory changes affecting patentability or enforcement.

5. How does patent CA2870005 impact market exclusivity in Canada?
It grants the patent holder a statutory monopoly on the claimed inventions, typically lasting 20 years from filing, thereby delaying generic competition and supporting commercial advantage.


References

  1. Canadian Patent Office Official Gazette, Patent CA2870005, issued June 15, 2020.
  2. Canadian Patent Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty Summary.
  4. European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Inventions.
  5. Federal Court of Canada decisions relating to pharmaceutical patent disputes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.