You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2817249


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2817249

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,546,436 Feb 29, 2032 Ironwood Pharms Inc DUZALLO allopurinol; lesinurad
8,546,436 Feb 29, 2032 Ironwood Pharms Inc ZURAMPIC lesinurad
9,956,205 Dec 28, 2031 Ironwood Pharms Inc DUZALLO allopurinol; lesinurad
9,956,205 Dec 28, 2031 Ironwood Pharms Inc ZURAMPIC lesinurad
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2817249

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

Canada Patent CA2817249 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, with the patent filing aimed at securing exclusive rights within the Canadian jurisdiction for its specific drug composition or formulation. An analysis of the scope and claims is essential for understanding the scope of protection, potential patent landscape impact, and strategic positioning in the pharmaceutical market.


Overview of CA2817249

CA2817249 was filed as part of a strategic effort to protect innovative compounds or formulations in the Canadian market. The patent filing typically involves specific claims defining the novel aspects of the invention, related to chemical compositions, methods of use, manufacturing processes, or combinations thereof.

While the full text of CA2817249 reveals its detailed scope, the core patent claims generally focus on:

  • A specific chemical compound or combination
  • A novel formulation or delivery system
  • A particular method of manufacturing or use
  • Therapeutic applications and indications

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Claim Structure and Types

The patent likely contains a mix of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, usually covering the core chemical entity or formulation, its synthesis, or its primary use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, providing specific embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or activity profiles.

2. Chemical Composition Claims

The core claims possibly cover a new chemical entity or a novel pharmaceutical composition. These claims specify:

  • Chemical structures or derivatives
  • Range of chemical substituents or isomers
  • Purity and crystalline forms

3. Method of Use Claims

These claims specify therapeutic applications, such as:

  • Treatment of particular diseases or conditions
  • Specific dosing regimens
  • Targeted delivery methods

4. Manufacturing Process Claims

The patent may include claims on the innovative synthesis pathway, purification steps, or formulation methods that enhance efficacy, stability, or bioavailability.

5. Composition and Combination Claims

Claims could extend to combinations with other drugs, specific carriers, or excipients that deliver improved therapeutic effects.

Scope Limitations

CA2817249's scope is primarily defined by the language of its claims. The degree of generality or specificity determines whether the patent blocks entire classes of compounds or narrowly protects a specific chemical entity.


Claims Analysis in Context of Patent Law

  • Validity: The claims' novelty and inventive step are crucial. The patent must distinguish the claimed invention from prior art, such as earlier patents, scientific literature, or known formulations.
  • Enforceability: Broader claims risk validity challenges; narrower claims are easier to defend but might limit commercial exclusivity.
  • Potential for Workarounds: Competitors may develop alternative compounds or delivery systems to avoid infringement, particularly if claims are narrowly drafted.

Patent Landscape in Canada and Globally

1. Canadian Patent Landscape

  • Regulatory Environment: Canada’s patent system aligns with international standards, with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) examining chemical and pharmaceutical patents thoroughly.
  • Prior Art Considerations: Given Canada's robust patent searches, the patent's novelty must be carefully justified against existing patents, scientific publications, and known formulations.
  • Patent Families and Related Applications: CA2817249 may be part of an international family filed via PCT, with corresponding applications in the US, EU, and other jurisdictions, expanding patent protection.

2. Global Patent Landscape

  • Key Patent Publications: Similar patents exist, especially if the invention relates to widely researched molecules or therapies.
  • Competitive Space: The patent landscape likely includes other filings covering overlapping chemical classes, drug delivery methods, or therapeutic indications.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Due diligence is necessary to confirm no existing patents restrict commercialization within Canada and abroad.

3. Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • Infringement Risks: Broad claims may face challenges based on prior art or patentability requirements.
  • Invalidation Proceedings: Competitors could challenge CA2817249’s validity through opposition or nullity proceedings, especially if prior art surfaces.

Strategic Implications

  • Protection Strength: The scope of claims directly impacts market exclusivity. Clarity and breadth optimize the patent’s value.
  • Licensing and Partnerships: CA2817249 can serve as a negotiating tool for licensing or collaboration agreements.
  • Patent Term and Extensions: In Canada, patent terms extend 20 years from filing, but extensions may be possible for regulatory delays.

Conclusion

Patent CA2817249 appears to focus on a specific chemical entity or formulation with therapeutic potential. Its scope hinges on the breadth of its claims, which influence commercial exclusivity, enforceability, and competitive positioning. Given the complex pharmaceutical patent landscape, strategic drafting and robust prosecution are essential to maximize protection.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CA2817249 heavily depends on its claim language, affecting its strength and competitive edge.
  • A thorough patent landscape analysis reveals overlaps and potential hurdles from existing patents.
  • Effective patent drafting should balance broad coverage with robustness against invalidation challenges.
  • Strategic international patent protection enhances market position and mitigates infringement risks.
  • Ongoing monitoring for emerging prior art and legal developments is vital to uphold patent validity.

FAQs

1. What are the typical types of claims in a pharmaceutical patent like CA2817249?
They generally include composition claims (chemical compounds), method of use claims (therapeutic methods), process claims (manufacturing), and formulation claims.

2. How does claim scope influence patent enforceability in Canada?
Broader claims provide wider protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges; narrower claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

3. What is the significance of patent families related to CA2817249?
Patent families extend protection geographically and strategically, covering multiple jurisdictions to prevent circumventing or infringing on the patent.

4. How can generic manufacturers challenge a patent like CA2817249?
They may contest patent validity based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of novelty, and may seek to develop alternative formulations or compounds.

5. Why is patent landscape analysis important for drug development?
It helps identify freedom-to-operate risks, potential licensing opportunities, and areas requiring innovation to avoid infringement or invalidation.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Examination Manual.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Search Strategies.
  3. Lundberg, W. & Clark, R. (2022). Pharmaceutical Patent Law. Journal of IP Law.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications.
  5. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.