You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2814523


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2814523

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,687,075 Jun 22, 2028 Salix Pharms OSMOPREP sodium phosphate, dibasic, anhydrous; sodium phosphate, monobasic, monohydrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA2814523: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Canada

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2814523 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in Canada, with implications for the drug’s patent protection, market exclusivity, and competitive landscape. This detailed analysis explores the scope and claims of patent CA2814523, contextualizing its position within the Canadian patent landscape, while providing insights relevant to stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and industry analysts.

Patent Overview: CA2814523

Patent CA2814523 was granted to protect an innovative pharmaceutical compound or formulation, potentially related to a therapeutic area such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, reflecting common sectors in Canadian pharmaceutical patents. Its issuance aids the patent holder in securing market exclusivity for a defined duration, generally 20 years from the filing date, barring extensions or patent term adjustments.

While the precise patent title and filing history are not provided here, the focus of this review centers on dissecting the scope, specific claims, and the broader patent landscape in Canada that influences or overlaps with this patent.


Scope of Patent CA2814523

The scope defines the legal boundaries of the patent rights—the extent to which the patent holder can prevent others from manufacturing, using, selling, or importing the claimed invention within Canada.

Patent Term and Filing Details

  • Filing date: Usually set around 2012–2014, providing a reference point for the patent term expiry (typically 20 years after filing).
  • Publication and grant: The patent was published and granted after examination, possibly in 2014–2015.
  • Priority date: Indicates when the earliest filing was made, relevant in assessing patent term and prior art considerations.

Type of Patent

  • Often classified as a therapeutic patent, potentially covering a new chemical entity (NCE) or a specific formulation or use.
  • The scope may include composition of matter, methods of use, or specific formulations, which directly impact the patent’s breadth.

Claims Analysis

The claims detail what the patent establishes as its legal boundaries. They are divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Likely define the core invention — possibly a new chemical compound, its synthesis, or a specific therapeutic use.
  • Example: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in treating disease Y."

Key features of the independent claims:

  • Compound structure: May specify a chemical formula, including optional substituents.
  • Method of production: Could encompass synthesis steps.
  • Therapeutic use: Specific medical indications linked to the compound.
  • Formulation aspects: Stabilizers, carriers, or delivery mechanisms.

Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims that specify particular embodiments or variations.
  • Examples include specific salt forms, dosage ranges, or delivery methods.
  • These add robustness, providing fallback positions if independent claims face invalidity challenges.

Claim Scope and Protection

  • Breadth: If claims encompass a broad class of compounds or uses, they afford extensive protection.
  • Narrowness: If claims are limited to specific compounds or formulations, the protection is more targeted, increasing vulnerability to design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape in Canada

Understanding the surrounding patent environment for similar drugs is essential. Key considerations include:

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Pre-existing patents: The landscape likely features patents on related compounds or uses, influencing patentability and scope.
  • Patent family members: The patent could be part of a broader family, including filings in other jurisdictions such as the US or Europe.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • In Canada, patents are susceptible to validity challenges, particularly on grounds of novelty or inventive step.
  • The patent’s strength depends on how clearly it distinguishes itself from prior art, such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or known compounds.

Overlap with Other Patents

  • Similar drugs or formulations may be protected elsewhere; Canadian patents often align with global patent strategies.
  • For instance, if a comparable patent exists in the US, licensing or litigation risks may influence commercial decisions.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market exclusivity: CA2814523 grants exclusive rights to commercialize the protected compound/formulation for 20 years.
  • Patent expiry: Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can enter the market, increasing competition.
  • Patent life extensions: Data or patent term extensions are possible under Canadian law, especially if the drug obtains regulatory approval delays.
  • Infringement risks: Competitors may attempt to design-around claims or challenge validity, emphasizing the importance of robust patent drafting.

Future Considerations and Strategic Insights

  • Patent life management: Encompassing formulation patents or method-of-use protections can prolong market exclusivity.
  • Global patent strategy: Filing in other jurisdictions enhances territorial protection, leveraging international patent frameworks such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  • Patent challenges: Vigilance against invalidity claims is crucial, especially considering Canadian courts' consistent scrutiny of patent novelty and non-obviousness.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope determines enforceability: Broad claims covering various chemical structures or uses fortify patent protection but demand clear novelty and inventive step.
  • Patent landscape complexity: Multiple overlapping patents necessitate diligent freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent claiming.
  • Legal robustness is vital: The strength of CA2814523 hinges on clear, specific claims that withstand prior art references and legal challenges.
  • Lifecycle management: Supplementing composition claims with method-of-use and formulation patents can extend market exclusivity.
  • Proactive monitoring: Regular landscape assessments and competitor patent filings inform strategic patent positioning and reduce infringement risks.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent CA2814523?
It likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its formulation, or specific therapeutic applications—aimed at safeguarding exclusive rights in Canada for a targeted medical indication.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in such patents?
In pharmaceutical patents, claims range from broad composition claims (covering whole classes of compounds) to narrow, specific compound or use claims, depending on the patent drafting strategy and prior art landscape.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Validity challenges, often based on lack of novelty or inventive step, are common. The strength of CA2814523 depends on the novelty of the claims relative to the prior art.

4. How does the Canadian patent landscape impact the protection offered by CA2814523?
Existing related patents, prior art, and patent filings in other jurisdictions influence its scope and enforceability. Overlapping patents may require licensing or licensing negotiations.

5. What strategies can enhance the lifespan of this patent’s protection?
Applying for method-of-use or formulation patents, pursuing patent term extensions, and maintaining vigilance through patent landscape monitoring are key strategies.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Specifications and Legal Status.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) systems.
  3. Canadian Patent Act. Legal provisions relevant to patent validity and infringement.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.