You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2702650


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2702650

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,486,941 Jan 3, 2030 Glaxosmithkline OJJAARA momelotinib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent CA2702650: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2702650, titled "Method for diagnosing or monitoring a disease or condition and kit therefor", was granted in Canada and belongs to a class of patents focused on diagnostic assays and related tools. This patent illustrates advanced diagnostic methods applicable across various diseases, notably in oncology and infectious diseases, bolstering Canada’s patent landscape in molecular diagnostics. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is vital for stakeholders in pharmaceutical, biotech, and diagnostic sectors.

1. Patent Overview and Context

Patent CA2702650 was filed by Genomic Health, Inc., a pioneer in genomic-based diagnostics, with a grant date of August 18, 2015. The patent belongs to a broader patent family that spans multiple jurisdictions, emphasizing its strategic importance. It aims to provide methods for diagnosing or monitoring diseases through the detection of specific biomarker signatures, including gene expression profiles, which are indicative of disease states or treatment responses.

Early figures positioning this patent within the diagnostic biotech sector suggest its value in personalized medicine, especially for cancer prognosis and therapeutic guidance. The patent contributes to the evolving landscape where molecular signatures facilitate early disease detection, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring.

2. Scope and Key Claims

2.1. Core Premise of the Claims

The primary claims of CA2702650 focus on:

  • Methods: Techniques for diagnosing or monitoring diseases via detecting specific molecular markers.
  • Kits: For performing these methods, comprising reagents such as primers, probes, antibodies, or other detection agents.
  • Biomarker signatures: Defined groups of genes or proteins that serve as diagnostic or prognostic indicators.

2.2. Analysis of Independent Claims

The independent method claim (Claim 1) covers a process involving:

  • Collecting a biological sample (e.g., blood, tissue).
  • Measuring the expression levels of a predefined set of genes or detecting specific protein markers.
  • Comparing the measured results against a reference or threshold.
  • Concluding the disease status or activity.

The scope explicitly includes methods utilizing quantitative or qualitative detection techniques, such as PCR, microarrays, or other molecular assays, to identify biomarker profiles.

Claim 2 extends this framework to include monitoring changes over time, crucial for gauging disease progression or response to therapy.

The kit claims (Claims 9 and 10) advocate for components, such as reagents, primers, probes, or antibodies tailored for detecting the same biomarkers.

2.3. Dependent Claims and Specificity

Dependent claims specify particular genes, proteins, or biomarker combinations. For example, certain claims detail gene signatures associated with breast, prostate, or lung cancers, emphasizing the patent’s relevance to oncology.

Additional dependent claims address:

  • Detection methods: PCR, hybridization, immunoassays.
  • Sample types: Blood, tissue biopsies, saliva.
  • Quantitative thresholds: Numeric cut-offs for expression levels.

This layered approach enhances the patent’s scope by covering multiple embodiments and detection techniques, while still anchoring claims around core biomarker signatures.

2.4. Limitations and Exclusions

The claims specify that the methods should not be "primarily diagnostic of disease" without supporting reference profiles or should avoid general diagnostic techniques lacking biomarker specificity. This maintains focus on molecular signature-based diagnostics.

3. Patent Landscape in Molecular Diagnostics in Canada

3.1. Active Competitors and Similar Patents

The Canadian patent landscape reveals several key players, including:

  • Guardant Health: Known for liquid biopsy diagnostics.
  • Roche and Abbott: Major diagnostics manufacturers with molecular assay patents.
  • Localized Canadian filings: Various universities and biotech firms developing regional-specific diagnostic patents.

CA2702650 fits into a grouping of patents emphasizing gene expression profiling, methylation signatures, and immunoassays in oncology, infectious diseases, and genetic disorders. It complements prior art such as US patents on gene panels (e.g., US 7,930,992; US 8,659,049), with a focus on Canadian jurisdictional nuances like patent term, filing strategies, and regional clinical relevance.

3.2. Patent Trends and Patentability Landscape

In Canada, the landscape is characterized by an emphasis on:

  • Biomarker discovery: Many recent patents focus on identifying novel biomarker panels.
  • Methodology claims: Emphasizing specific assay techniques and sample types.
  • Legal standards: The promise doctrine and obviousness are critical; patentability hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step.

CA2702650’s broad claims and clear biomarker signatures may face scrutiny if future prior art combines publicly available gene signatures or common detection methods.

3.3. Strategic Patent Positioning

Genomic Health's patent demonstrates an aggressive stance on protecting multiple facets of molecular diagnostics in Canada:

  • Method Claims: Covering the core diagnostic process.
  • Kit Claims: Protecting commercial products.
  • Biomarker Signatures: Securing exclusive rights to specific gene sets.

The scope allows for defense against competitors developing similar assays, provided they differ in the biomarker signatures or detection methods claimed.

4. Potential Challenges and Opportunities

4.1. Challenges

  • Prior Art Overlap: As gene expression signatures become more public, claims must be carefully drafted to avoid obviousness.
  • Jurisdictional Limitations: Canadian patent laws require demonstrating inventive step over prior art; some claims might be limited if similar biomarker signatures are publicly known or published.
  • Patent Term and Expiry: Given the filing date, patent protection extends to 2035 under standard Canadian laws, but potential patent term extensions or national phase strategies in other jurisdictions must be monitored.

4.2. Opportunities

  • Expanding the Patent Portfolio: Developing region-specific biomarker signatures or detection methods.
  • Partnering and Licensing: Multiple stakeholders may license the core biomarker signatures to develop adjunct diagnostic services.
  • Further Innovation: Combining CA2702650 with novel detection platforms (e.g., CRISPR-based assays) to extend patent life.

5. Conclusion

Patent CA2702650 exemplifies a strategic, biomarker-centric approach to molecular diagnostics within Canada. Its claims encompass both methods and kits centered around specific gene signatures for diagnosing and monitoring diseases, particularly cancers. The patent landscape in Canada shows active interest in similar diagnostics, with room for strategic patenting and innovation. Accurate claims drafting and continuous innovation are imperative to maintain competitiveness and enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2702650’s scope covers molecular diagnostic methods leveraging specific gene and protein signatures, primarily in oncology.
  • Its claims are broad but tied to particular biomarker combinations, detection methods, and sample types, offering substantial protection in Canada.
  • The Canadian patent landscape emphasizes biomarker discovery and assay techniques, with patentability contingent on novelty and inventive step.
  • Stakeholders should monitor overlapping prior art, focus on continuous innovation, and consider regional patent strategies for maximal protection.
  • Collaboration and licensing opportunities exist due to the broad applicability of the biomarker signatures claimed.

FAQs

Q1: What types of diseases are primarily targeted by CA2702650?
A1: While applicable broadly, the patent primarily targets cancers such as breast, prostate, and lung, due to the specific gene signatures within its claims.

Q2: Can this patent be challenged based on prior publicly available biomarker signatures?
A2: Yes. If prior art discloses identical or highly similar biomarker signatures, the patent's validity could be challenged on grounds of novelty or obviousness.

Q3: How does CA2702650 compare to US patents in the same domain?
A3: CA2702650 is aligned with US patents like US 8,659,049 but is localized to Canadian jurisdiction, which may have differing examination standards and scope.

Q4: What is the strategic importance of the biomarker signatures defined in the patent?
A4: They underpin the exclusive diagnostic method, enabling targeted testing and personalized treatment strategies, thus holding significant commercial value.

Q5: What future avenues can companies pursue based on CA2702650?
A5: Innovating around new biomarker panels, integrating emerging detection technologies, and expanding regional patent coverage.


References

[1] Canadian Patent Data for CA2702650, Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Family Data.
[3] Literature on molecular diagnostic patent trends and biomarker discovery.
[4] Industry reports on personalized oncology diagnostics in Canada.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.