You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2678124


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2678124

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,727,987 May 17, 2025 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
8,318,745 May 17, 2025 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2678124

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Canada patent CA2678124, granted to Biogen Idec for a specific neurological treatment, exemplifies strategic patenting within the highly competitive biotechnology sector. A comprehensive understanding of this patent's scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape is essential for industry stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent attorneys—aiming to navigate market exclusivities, potential for patent infringement, and opportunities for licensing.

This analysis provides an in-depth review of CA2678124’s claims, their scope, and its relevance within the Canadian and global patent landscape, grounded in patent law principles and recent biotech patenting trends.


Patent Overview

Patent Title: "Use of a Calcitriol Derivative for the Treatment of a Neurodegenerative Disease"
Filing Date: September 8, 2010
Issue Date: March 1, 2016
Assignee: Biogen Idec (now part of Biogen Inc.)

The patent primarily covers the use of specific calcitriol derivatives for treating neurodegenerative conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and other progressive neurological disorders.


Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Interpretation

A patent's scope depends heavily on the language of its claims. In CA2678124, the claims are primarily directed at:

  • Method claims for utilizing particular calcitriol derivatives
  • Therapeutic methods for neurological conditions involving these derivatives
  • Formulations comprising these compounds

Key Claim Types

  1. Use Claims
    Claim 1 exemplifies a 'second medical use' claim, asserting the use of a specific calcitriol derivative to treat neurodegenerative diseases. This type of claim is common in pharmaceutical patents, protecting the active use of compounds for particular indications.

  2. Compound Claims
    These claims aim to cover specific calcitriol derivatives, especially those characterized by unique substitutions that modulate activity and safety profiles. They serve as a foundation for method claims, offering broad coverage over the compounds themselves.

  3. Method of Treatment Claims
    Broader claims cover administering the compound to patients with designated conditions, such as MS, Parkinson’s disease, or Alzheimer’s disease.

  4. Formulation and Composition Claims
    Claims may include pharmaceutical compositions containing the calcitriol derivatives combined with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.

Claims Scope and Limitations

The claims target specific calcitriol derivatives, with chemical structures detailed in the patent. The scope appears to be moderately broad but specific enough to distinguish from prior art. For instance, the patent emphasizes derivatives with modifications that maximize neuroprotective effects while minimizing calcemic side effects, a significant improvement over traditional calcitriol formulations.

However, claim scope could be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds or use methods, especially considering the known role of vitamin D analogs in neurological treatments.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Context

BioPharma sectors have seen a surge in vitamin D analog patents, especially for neurodegenerative diseases, motivated by the molecule's immunomodulatory properties. CA2678124 fits into a broader trend, with prior art including:

  • Patent WO2004027234: Covers vitamin D analogs for autoimmune diseases.
  • US Patent No. 7,949,245: Discloses calcitriol derivatives for neurological indications.
  • EP Patent Application 1,574,759: Focuses on vitamin D analog formulations.

Canada’s patent law recognizes the novelty and inventive step of these derivatives, but the patent landscape requires ongoing vigilance for potential patentably similar compounds or uses.

Canadian Patent Environment

Canadian patent law mirrors other jurisdictions regarding novelty, inventive step, and utility. The patent's expiration is expected around 2030, providing market exclusivity for over a decade, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

The Canadian patent landscape for neurodegenerative disease treatments remains competitive, with recent filings focusing on vitamin D analogs. CA2678124's claims must be distinct enough to withstand potential review against existing Canadian patents.

Strategic Position

Biogen's patent established a foothold in the Canadian market for calcitriol derivatives targeting neurological conditions. Its claims, if upheld on validity, provide a strong barrier against generic competition for the subject compounds and methods.

Potential competitors might attempt to design around the patent by using different analogs or alternative therapeutic methods, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent drafting strategies.


Validity Considerations and Competitive Risks

The validity of CA2678124 hinges on:

  • Novelty: No prior disclosures of the specific derivatives or their use in neurological diseases.
  • Inventive Step: The derivation of these compounds from known calcitriol analogs involves non-obvious modifications.
  • Utility: Demonstrated improved efficacy or safety profiles supports the utility claims.

Opposition or invalidity challenges could arise based on prior art disclosures or whether the modifications are deemed routine.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders:
    Maintain rigorous monitoring for third-party filings that could encroach on the claims or challenge validity.

  • For Generics & Biosimilars:
    Explore alternative compounds or methods to avoid infringement—targeting broader or different indications.

  • For Investors:
    Recognize the duration of exclusivity afforded by the patent and assess the opportunity for partnering or licensing.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and claims of CA2678124 strategically protect specific calcitriol derivatives and their use in neurodegenerative diseases, providing a durable barrier for Biogen in Canada.
  • The patent landscape indicates active research and patenting in vitamin D analogs for neurological conditions, requiring vigilance for potential infringement or invalidity attacks.
  • The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating the novelty and inventive step over extensive prior art, underscoring the importance of detailed chemical and functional disclosures.
  • Proprietary formulations or methods that substantially differ from these claims can constitute viable alternatives and should be explored for competitive differentiation.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring, combined with strategic patent drafting, remains crucial for protecting market position amidst vigorous innovation.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims of patent CA2678124?
The claims specifically cover particular calcitriol derivatives and their use in treating neurodegenerative diseases. While detailed, they are sufficiently broad to encompass a range of chemical modifications that fall within the described structures.

2. Can generics compete with this patent in Canada?
Yes, once the patent expires or if invalidated, generics can introduce similar formulations. During the term, infringing products may be challenged or blocked, depending on the patent’s enforceability.

3. What is the potential for patent challenges to CA2678124?
Challenges could arise based on prior art disclosures or arguments that the claimed compounds or uses lack novelty or inventive step. Vigilance and patent validity defenses are essential.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
It aligns with a broader portfolio of vitamin D analog patents aimed at neurological conditions, reflecting a strategic focus on unmet medical needs and niche therapeutic markets.

5. What are key considerations for companies developing calcitriol derivatives?
They must ensure their compounds and uses do not infringe the claims and should evaluate patent landscapes thoroughly to avoid potential legal risks.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Patent CA2678124.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO2004027234.
  3. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent US7949245.
  4. European Patent Office. Patent EP1574759.
  5. Recent literature on vitamin D analogs in neurodegenerative treatments.

Conclusion

Patent CA2678124 exemplifies a strategic effort by Biogen to secure Canadian rights over specific calcitriol derivatives for neurodegenerative diseases. Its scope is carefully crafted to balance broad protection with novelty requirements. Ongoing patent landscape vigilance and legal robustness are necessary to safeguard market exclusivity and facilitate innovation in this promising therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.