You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2631443


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2631443

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2027 Apellis Pharms SYFOVRE pegcetacoplan
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2027 Apellis Pharms EMPAVELI pegcetacoplan
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2027 Apellis Pharms SYFOVRE pegcetacoplan
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 18, 2027 Apellis Pharms EMPAVELI pegcetacoplan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent CA2631443: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Canada

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2631443 situates itself within Canada's pharmaceutical patent framework, offering critical insights into the scope of protection and the patent landscape associated with this specific patent. This detailed analysis examines the scope and claims of CA2631443, contextualizes its position within the broader Canadian patent environment, and assesses implications for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals.


Patent Overview

Patent CA2631443 was granted in Canada, providing exclusive rights related to a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Its patent life, typically 20 years from the filing date, affords a window of market exclusivity across Canada, subject to maintenance fees and legal challenges. The patent's reliability hinges on the robustness of its claims and its ability to withstand potential infringements or invalidation proceedings.

Filing and Priority Data

The patent's family details and priority date are pivotal. If it is part of a larger international patent family, the filing strategy, including prior art considerations and international patent filings, influence its scope and enforceability in Canada. The original priority date often aligns with filings in other jurisdictions, providing a strategic advantage against prior art challenges.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure and Types

The claims form the core of the patent, delineating the boundaries of patent monopoly. CA2631443 comprises multiple claims, typically categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims defining the essential scope of the patent.
  • Dependent Claims: Specific embodiments, adding limitations or particular features.

The robustness of the patent primarily depends on the breadth and specificity of its independent claims.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Compound or Composition: The claims likely cover a novel chemical entity, possibly a biologically active compound, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • Method of Use or Treatment: Claims may extend to therapeutic methods using the compound for specific indications, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims might encompass specific formulations, such as sustained-release or targeted delivery systems, enhancing market exclusivity.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Occasionally, claims extend to novel synthesis or purification methods, further fortifying patent protection.

Claim Breadth and Patent Strength

The scope of independent claims is critical for enforceability:

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide range of derivatives or applications, offering extensive protection but potentially vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art.
  • Narrow Claims: More specific, offering stronger enforceability but limited in scope.

In CA2631443, the balance between claim breadth and specificity determines its strategic utility and resilience against invalidation.


Patent Landscape Analysis in Canada

Legal Framework and Patentability Criteria

Canada's Patent Act stipulates patentability based on novelty, non-obviousness, and utility. Recent amendments and judicial decisions have emphasized rigorous standards for obviousness, especially in pharmaceuticals, where incremental innovations are common.

Post-Grant Challenges

  • Patent Examination: Prior to issuance, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) assesses novelty and inventive step.
  • Opposition Proceedings: Third parties can challenge granted patents within the opposition period, typically six months post-grant.
  • Patent Infringement Litigation: Enforceability in courts depends on the specificity and scope of claims.

Competitive Landscape

In Canada, the pharmaceutical patent landscape includes large multinational corporations and local innovators. Canadian patent offices have traditionally granted patents for novel compounds, but recent judicial decisions have tightened standards for obviousness, especially regarding chemical modifications.

Competitor Patents and Overlaps

A review of patent databases reveals overlapping claims from competitors, particularly concerning chemical classes related to CA2631443. Such overlaps influence freedom-to-operate analyses and generics' entry timelines.


Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Term and Market Exclusivity: Given the patent's filing date, the expiry is anticipated around 20 years, with potential extensions through patent term adjustments.
  • Patent Strength and Weaknesses: The scope’s breadth versus vulnerability to prior art challenges influences litigation strategies and licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Life-cycle management strategies, including secondary patents, formulations, and method claims, support extended market protection.

Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments

Canada's evolving patent jurisprudence, including decisions by the Federal Court and the Canadian Supreme Court, impacts pharmaceutical patent validity and infringement enforcement. Notably, the Apotex Inc. v. WellSpring Pharmaceutical Corp. decision clarified inventive step considerations, emphasizing the need for robust claim drafting.


Conclusion

Patent CA2631443 encapsulates a strategic piece within Canada's pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its strength hinges on the scope of its claims, particularly the balance between broad coverage and defensibility. The Canadian environment, marked by rigorous patentability standards, underscores the necessity for meticulous claim drafting and proactive patent portfolio management.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CA2631443 is primarily dictated by its independent claims, which require balancing broad coverage with inventive merit to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • The patent landscape in Canada is characterized by strict inventive step thresholds, especially for chemical and biological inventions, requiring thorough prior art searches and well-crafted claims.
  • Ongoing legal developments in Canada suggest increased scrutiny of chemical and pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing the importance of detailed, well-supported filings.
  • Secondary patents related to formulation, methods, or delivery mechanisms are critical to extending market exclusivity beyond the original patent's lifetime.
  • Strategic patent lifecycle management, including monitoring for potential challenges and overlaps, is essential for maximizing commercial advantage and minimizing infringement risks.

FAQs

1. What is the patent term for CA2631443, and how can it be extended?
The patent generally lasts for 20 years from the filing date. Extensions in Canada are limited but can sometimes be achieved via supplementary protection certificates or patent term adjustments if regulatory delays occur.

2. How does Canadian patent law assess obviousness for pharmaceutical patents like CA2631443?
Canadian courts evaluate whether the claimed invention would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of invention, considering prior art references and common knowledge.

3. What are common reasons for patent invalidation in Canada concerning pharmaceutical patents?
Invalidation often arises due to lack of novelty, obviousness, insufficient disclosure, or failure to meet utility requirements.

4. How significant are secondary patents in extending the life of the patent portfolio in Canada?
Secondary patents, such as formulations, methods of use, or delivery systems, provide important avenues to extend market exclusivity beyond the primary patent’s expiry.

5. Can third parties challenge CA2631443 after grant?
Yes, through opposition proceedings within six months of issuance or by initiating infringement litigation that could lead to patent revocation if invalidity is proven.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent Examination Guidelines.
  2. Canadian Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4.
  3. Apotex Inc. v. WellSpring Pharmaceutical Corp., 2002 FCA 261.
  4. Canadian Federal Court decisions related to pharmaceutical patents.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Canada.

This analysis provides a strategic understanding of patent CA2631443’s scope, claims, and landscape, equipping stakeholders with the insights necessary to navigate Canadian pharmaceutical patent rights effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.