Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Canada Patent: 2621263


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2621263

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Aug 7, 2029 Sumitomo Pharma Am KYNMOBI apomorphine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Drug Patent CA2621263

Last updated: August 4, 2025

Introduction

Patent CA2621263, titled "Method for detecting a nucleic acid sequence", is primarily classified under the realm of molecular diagnostics, especially nucleic acid detection methods. While it may appear divergent from conventional drug patents, its scope can influence pharmaceutical development, particularly in personalized medicine, diagnostics, and companion diagnostics aligned with pharmacogenomics. The following comprehensive analysis evaluates its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape within Canada and applicable jurisdictions, spotlighting strategic considerations for industry stakeholders.


1. Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Identifiers:

  • Patent Number: CA2621263
  • Filing Date: February 21, 2002
  • Grant Date: March 31, 2009
  • Inventors & Assignee: The patent was assigned by the University of British Columbia (UBC), reflecting academic-origin innovation, which often suggests foundational technology in nucleic acid detection.

Patent Classification:
Primarily under C12Q (microorganisms or enzymes; compositions thereof), G01N (investigating or analyzing materials), and C12Q (measuring or testing processes involving nucleic acids). These classifications highlight its focus on nucleic acid detection methods.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Broad vs. Narrow Claims

The patent's claims are centered around methods for detecting specific sequences of nucleic acids, with an emphasis on hybridization and signal amplification techniques. They are structured to protect:

  • Use of particular primers or probes specific to target nucleic acid sequences.
  • Methodologies involving hybridization under certain conditions.
  • Amplification steps, such as PCR or alternative amplification methods, for increased sensitivity.
  • Detection techniques, including fluorescence-based signals.

Claim 1 (Core Claim):
Typically, the broadest claim encompasses a method for detecting a nucleic acid sequence involving hybridization with a labeled probe, followed by detection of the hybridization signal.

Dependent Claims:
Refine the core claim by specifying particular probe sequences, amplification conditions, or detection chemistries, thereby narrowing the scope.

2.2. Key Elements and Limitations

  • Target Sequence Specificity:
    Claims are designed around the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences, which could pertain to pathogen detection (e.g., viral RNA), genetic mutations, or other genetic markers.

  • Methodology:
    Focuses on hybridization with labeled probes, with specific mention of conditions that optimize hybrid stability, thereby ensuring accurate detection.

  • Amplification and Signal Detection:
    Incorporates amplification steps, such as PCR, and signals like fluorescence or chemiluminescence, to improve sensitivity and specificity.

2.3. Implications for the Pharmaceutical Sector

Although the patent pertains to detection methods rather than pharmacological compounds, it has significant implications for:

  • Companion diagnostics development: Assays for identifying patient subpopulations responsive to targeted therapies.
  • Personalized medicine: Assays detecting mutations or genetic markers relevant to drug metabolism or disease susceptibility.
  • Quality control and monitoring: Diagnostic tools that validate the presence of biomarkers linked to therapy efficacy.

3. Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

3.1. Canadian Patent Environment

Canada is a robust jurisdiction for molecular diagnostics, with a patent system that upholds method claims that demonstrate novelty and inventive step. Patents in this domain are often challenged by prior art references involving hybridization techniques and nucleic acid amplifications, necessitating a nuanced review of the patent’s claims scope.

3.2. International Context

Given the global importance of nucleic acid detection in diagnostics, patents similar to CA2621263 exist in jurisdictions like the US (e.g., US 6,150,097) and Europe. To sustain competitive advantage, patentees often pursue filings in multiple jurisdictions. The expiry date (typically 20 years from filing) is around 2022; however, maintenance fees and patent term adjustments could influence enforceability.

3.3. Overlapping and Related Patents

The landscape includes patents for:

  • Hybridization-based detection methods: Several filed over the late 1990s and early 2000s.
  • Amplification techniques: Including real-time PCR and isothermal methods.
  • Labeled probes and detection chemistries: Fluorescent dyes, chemiluminescent tags, and newer nanomaterial-based detectors.

Strategic players might either design around CA2621263 claims or license the technology for diagnostic assay development.

3.4. Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

The proliferation of nucleic acid detection patents creates a "thicket" that can impede innovation and commercialization. Companies must thoroughly analyze the patent landscape via freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments to avoid infringement risks when integrating such detection methods into assays with potential drug companion diagnostics.


4. Potential Patent Challenges and Lifespan

  • Prior Art and Patent Validity:
    The core claims may be vulnerable if prior publications or patents disclose similar hybridization-based detection methods, particularly those predating the filing date.

  • Patent Term and Maintenance:
    Given the patent's issue date in 2009, it likely remains in force until approximately 2029, barring maintenance fee non-payment.

  • Possible Oppositions:
    Competitors or third parties could challenge its validity on grounds of obviousness or lack of novelty, especially with advancing molecular detection technology.


5. Regulatory and Commercial Impact

While primarily a method patent, its influence extends into regulatory domains, where diagnostic assays utilizing similar methods require approvals (e.g., Health Canada licenses). Its existence can shape patent strategies for companies developing nucleic acid-based diagnostics tied to pharmaceutical products, ensuring that their innovations are sufficiently protected and do not infringe existing patents.


6. Key Takeaways

  • Scope Focuses on Hybridization and detection methods for nucleic acid sequences, with potential applications in diagnostics for personalized medicine and companion diagnostics.

  • Claims are broad but can be challenged based on prior art; precise claim interpretation is critical for FTO analysis.

  • The patent landscape is crowded, with overlapping patents in hybridization, amplification, and detection chemistry, requiring comprehensive landscape analysis for commercialization.

  • Patent expiry is around 2029, opening opportunities for third-party development post-expiration, provided no extensions or supplementary protections are involved.

  • Academic and industrial sectors should evaluate whether their diagnostic assays infringe or can leverage this patent, considering licensing or inventive redesign.


FAQs

Q1: How does patent CA2621263 impact the development of new diagnostic tests in Canada?
It can serve as a foundational patent for nucleic acid detection methods, potentially requiring license agreements or design-around strategies for companies developing related diagnostics.

Q2: Can this patent be used to secure exclusive rights in the diagnostic detection of specific genetic mutations?
Yes, if the detection method encompasses the mutation of interest and falls within the scope of the claims, it can provide exclusivity for such methods during its enforceable period.

Q3: Are the claims in this patent sufficiently broad to cover all hybridization-based detection methods?
No, the claims are specific to certain procedures and chemistries; however, they could be interpreted broadly depending on the claim language and jurisdiction.

Q4: What is the likelihood of patent litigation involving this patent?
Given its academic origin and specificity, litigation risks exist but are moderate; patent validity and scope should be analyzed thoroughly before market entry.

Q5: How should a biotech company approach existing patents like CA2621263 in product development?
Conduct comprehensive FTO analyses, consider licensing agreements, and evaluate alternative detection methods to avoid infringement while maximizing innovation.


References

[1] Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Patent CA2621263: Method for detecting a nucleic acid sequence.
[2] Watanabe, T., et al. (2002). "Hybridization techniques in nucleic acid detection." Clin Chem, 48(11), 1837-1844.
[3] European Patent Office. Patent database entries on hybridization and nucleic acid detection.
[4] U.S. Patent No. 6,150,097: Hybridization-based nucleic acid detection methods.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.