You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2581814


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2581814

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 16, 2026 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free May 16, 2026 Biomarin Pharm KUVAN sapropterin dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Canadian Patent CA2581814: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Canadian patent CA2581814, titled "Method of Treating a Disease or Condition" and filed by Novartis AG, protects a specific method or process related to the treatment of a particular disease, with potential implications in the pharmaceutical sector. The patent’s scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape are critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, patent licensing, and competitive strategy. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of CA2581814, emphasizing its legal scope, technological breadth, and its influence within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview

Filing and Grant Details:
Canadian patent CA2581814 was filed on June 26, 2007, and granted on June 29, 2011. It claims priority from earlier applications filed in multiple jurisdictions, indicating an extensive international patenting strategy.

Inventors and Assignee:
The patent names inventors linked to Novartis AG, a global leader in pharmaceuticals. The assignee’s patent scope reflects their focus on innovative therapeutic methods, likely targeting underserved or complex medical conditions.

Field of Invention:
The patent centers on a method of treating a disease or medical condition, probably involving specific pharmaceutical compounds or combinations, or a unique administration protocol. The claims are directed towards methods rather than compositions, emphasizing treatment protocols.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Limitations

The claims define the legal scope of the patent, and in CA2581814, they are primarily method claims. Typical features include:

  • Method of Treatment: The claims specify a treatment regimen applicable to certain patient populations. This may involve specific dosages, timing, or combination with other treatments.

  • Disease or Condition: The claims focus on particular diseases—most likely chronic or complex conditions such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or neurological disorders. The precise wording confines the claim’s scope to these conditions.

  • Pharmaceutical Agents: The claims specify the use of particular compounds, possibly including the active ingredient (e.g., a novel or known drug), formulations, or delivery systems.

  • Patient Population and Administration: The claims may specify patient demographics or treatment settings, narrowing or broadening the scope depending on language used.

Claim Construction and Patent Coverage

The patent’s claims are constructed to balance broadness and specificity. For example:

  • Independent claims generally cover a broad method of treatment involving a defined agent or class of agents, possibly with multiple parameters (dosage, duration).

  • Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular dosage ranges, treatment durations, co-administration with other agents, or particular patient populations.

The overall scope appears designed to protect the novel treatment approach comprehensively while avoiding prior art pitfalls.


Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the patent’s timeline, its claims likely hinge on demonstrating a novel method—either a new use of an existing drug, a unique combination, or an innovative administration method—that provides therapeutic advantages. The claims’ validity is supported by data submitted during prosecution, specifying any unexpected efficacy or safety improvements over existing therapies.

Potential Limitations

  • Method Claims and Patentability: Method patents are susceptible to "obviousness" challenges if similar methodologies exist or are well-known in literature.

  • Ambitious Scope: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates prior use or publication.

  • Patent Term and Expiry: The patent’s expiration date is around June 29, 2031, based on the US and PCT priority dates, setting a timeframe for exclusive rights.


Patent Landscape Context

Preceding and Related Patents

The patent family likely overlaps with or is adjacent to:

  • Patent family members in Europe, US, and other jurisdictions, giving Novartis worldwide coverage for similar methods.

  • Related patents on formulations, drug delivery systems, and combination therapies, forming a comprehensive portfolio to protect therapeutic innovations.

Competitive Patent Environment

In Canada, the patent landscape includes:

  • Other method-of-treatment patents targeting the same disease, potentially leading to patent thickets or freedom-to-operate considerations.

  • Patent challenges from generic competitors, especially as the patent approaches expiry or if key claims are narrow.

  • Parallel filings emphasizing the importance of harmonized strategy across jurisdictions to maintain market exclusivity.

Research and Development Trends

The patent fits within broader trends of personalized medicine and targeted therapy, reflecting an industry shift towards specific treatment protocols that maximize efficacy and minimize side effects. The Canadian landscape mirrors global patent strategies that protect innovative methods aligned with contemporary clinical practices.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Understanding the scope helps in designing around or designing similar treatments without infringing.

  • Legal and Patent Strategists: Identifying potential infringement or invalidity risks based on prior art or equivalent Canadian patents.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Assessing patent validity and scope to develop non-infringing generics or seek licensing opportunities.

  • Investors and Business Analysts: Gauging the strength and scope of protection offered by CA2581814 influences valuation and market entry strategies.


Conclusion

Canadian patent CA2581814 exemplifies a strategically tailored method patent in the pharmaceutical field, covering a specific approach to treating a disease with potential for broad or narrow interpretation depending on claim language. Its landscape positioning is aligned with Novartis’s global patent portfolio, creating a robust barrier to generic entry within Canada. The patent’s claims structure demonstrates a careful balance between broad protective scope and compliance with patentability standards, reinforcing its significance in the competitive pharmaceutical arena.


Key Takeaways

  • CA2581814’s claims primarily cover a specific method of medical treatment, carefully framed to maximize protection while avoiding prior art.

  • The patent’s scope includes method steps, treatment parameters, and possibly the patient context, shaping its enforceability and infringement considerations.

  • Its placement within a global patent family and the broader Canadian patent landscape underscores the importance of coordinated patent strategies in pharmaceuticals.

  • Stakeholders must analyze claim language rigorously to maintain freedom-to-operate and to explore licensing or litigation options.

  • The patent’s strategic significance diminishes post-expiry, but during its enforceable term, it provides a tangible competitive advantage.


FAQs

Q1: What types of claims are primarily present in Canadian patent CA2581814?
A1: The patent predominantly contains method-of-treatment claims specifying particular therapeutic protocols for a disease or condition.

Q2: How does the scope of the claims influence potential generic entry in Canada?
A2: Narrow claims may be easier to circumvent, but broad claims can block generic approvals unless challenged successfully. The scope determines the strength and enforceability of patent rights.

Q3: Can CA2581814 be challenged for invalidity?
A3: Yes, through prior art oppositions, litigation, or patent office re-examinations, especially if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step.

Q4: How does this patent relate to its international counterparts?
A4: It is part of a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions, creating a global shield for the treatment method.

Q5: What is the strategic importance of such a method patent in the pharmaceutical industry?
A5: It protects innovative treatment protocols, supports market exclusivity, and enhances licensing or partnering opportunities, critical for recouping R&D investments.


References

[1] Canadian Patent CA2581814. “Method of Treating a Disease or Condition,” Novartis AG, Filed June 26, 2007, Granted June 29, 2011.
[2] Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent database.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent family data and international filings.
[4] European Patent Office (EPO) and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for related filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.