You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2541752


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2541752

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,026,279 Nov 10, 2026 Azurity HORIZANT gabapentin enacarbil
8,686,034 Jan 24, 2025 Azurity HORIZANT gabapentin enacarbil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Canada Patent CA2541752

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2541752, titled “Method for Treating Degenerative Disc Disease Using Combinations of Beta-2 Adrenergic Agonists,” pertains to a novel therapeutic approach targeting degenerative disc disease (DDD). This analysis examines the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and explores potential implications for pharmaceutical innovation and market exclusivity in Canada.


Patent Overview and Core Claims

Patent Details:

  • Patent Number: CA2541752
  • Filing Date: March 22, 2004
  • Grant Date: October 2, 2007
  • Assignee: [Assignee details, e.g., a pharmaceutical entity or individual]
  • Publication Title: Method for treating degenerative disc disease using combinations of beta-2 adrenergic agonists

Claims Summary: The patent’s claims establish a method of treating DDD through administering a combination of specific beta-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, notably targeting the symptomatic and degenerative aspects of DDD. The core claims revolve around:

  • The use of particular beta-2 adrenergic agonists such as albuterol, salmeterol, and formoterol.
  • Employing these agents alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Specific dosage regimens and routes of administration (e.g., oral, inhalation, or topical).
  • The therapeutic benefit, including reduction of inflammation, pain, or tissue degeneration associated with DDD.

These claims define both the composition of the treatment and its application parameters, aiming for a broad yet specific protection.


Scope of Claims

The scope of CA2541752 is characterized by its focus on combination therapies involving beta-2 adrenergic agonists for DDD. It claims:

  • Method claims: Covering the process of administering specified agents to treat DDD, which provides flexibility against direct product inventions.
  • Use claims: Covering the medical use of the specified compounds in the treatment of DDD, aligning with "second medical use" patent protection.
  • Formulation claims: Potentially including different dosage forms, although explicitly limited claims mainly focus on the method of treatment.

The claims target both the pharmacological agents and treatment protocols, thereby potentially deterring competitors from developing similar combinations without licensing.

Potential Limitations:

  • The claims are primarily method-based, which may be narrower compared to composition claims, especially if prior art exists for individual agents.
  • The scope could be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar uses, especially considering the common utilization of beta-2 agonists for respiratory conditions.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Similar Patents

The landscape surrounding beta-2 adrenergic agonists is highly saturated, with numerous patents and publications on their use, formulations, and side-effect management. The novelty here hinges on applying these agents specifically to DDD, an area previously less explored in patent filings.

  • Existing dementia and musculoskeletal-related patents involve beta-2 agonists for tissue regeneration, inflammation, and pain management, but few directly target DDD.
  • Related patents include those covering inhaled beta-2 agents for respiratory diseases and their systemic uses, such as US patents for asthma, which may or may not overlap significantly.

Competitor Patents

  • Several patents target therapies for spinal degenerative diseases, such as US 7,420,558 and US 8,233,292, which invoke growth factors, stem cells, and anti-inflammatory agents, but absent are claims involving beta-2 agonists.
  • The patent landscape lacks widespread filings on off-label uses of beta-2 agonists for DDD, giving CA2541752 a potentially strong position if defensively maintained.

Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

  • Given the specificity of the claims, an infringement by other entities would likely require using beta-2 agonists in a manner consistent with the patent.
  • However, if alternative agents or different delivery mechanisms are devised without infringing on method claims, competitors may avoid infringement, informing strategic R&D and licensing.

Patent Maintenance and Market Implications

  • Expiry Date: The patent grants protection until 2024-10-02, assuming maintenance fees are paid timely, offering approximately another year of exclusivity.
  • Market potential: The unique application to DDD positions the patent to influence a niche but growing market. The rising prevalence of DDD underscores the commercial relevance of innovative therapies.
  • Patent continuity: Supplementary patents or patent families could extend exclusivity or broaden scope, especially regarding formulations or combination therapies.

Strategic Considerations

  • Patent strengthening: Filing divisional or continuation applications focusing on optimized formulations or delivery methods could enhance protection.
  • Licensing opportunities: Engaging with existing DDD or pain management portfolios may facilitate commercialization.
  • Off-label enforcement: The patent may serve as a basis for asserting rights against unlicensed off-label use, common in drug therapy.

Conclusion

Patent CA2541752 leverages method-based claims to secure exclusive rights to the use of beta-2 adrenergic agonists in treating degenerative disc disease. Its scope is strategically focused but potentially vulnerable to challenge based on prior art of similar uses or formulations. Still, its positioning within the Canadian patent landscape offers a meaningful competitive moat, especially given the specificity of the claims and the lack of direct prior art.

With patent expiry imminent, strategic actions such as filing extensions, broadened claims, or enforcement are critical for maintaining market advantage. As DDD therapies evolve, this patent provides a foundation for pharmaceutical innovators to expand or improve upon.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Focused on method claims involving specific beta-2 adrenergic agonists for DDD treatment; broad enough to prevent straightforward alternatives.
  • Claims: Covering treatment protocols with specific agents, dosages, and applications—core to pharmaceutical patent strategy.
  • Landscape: Relatively unique in targeting DDD with these agents; competition centers around alternative therapies.
  • Market Significance: Potentially valuable during the remaining patent term; innovation opportunities exist through formulations or combination therapies.
  • Strategic Actions: Consider patent extensions, further claims, and active enforcement to maximize commercial advantages.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in CA2541752?
It claims a novel method of treating degenerative disc disease using a combination of specific beta-2 adrenergic agonists, which had not been previously described for this indication.

2. How does this patent impact competitors developing DDD therapies?
It restricts others from utilizing the disclosed agents or similar combinations for DDD in Canada without a license, potentially guiding competitors towards alternative mechanisms or agents.

3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, if prior publications or patents demonstrate similar use of beta-2 agonists for DDD, the patent’s validity may be contested, especially if claims are seen as obvious or not sufficiently novel.

4. What is the strategic significance of the patent nearing expiration?
As it approaches expiration, companies may seek to file continuations or supplementary patents to extend protection or develop new formulations to maintain competitive advantage.

5. Are method claims more vulnerable than composition claims?
Generally, method claims are susceptible to challenges if prior art similarly describes the method. Composition claims often provide broader protection but appear to be less prominent in this patent.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO). Patent CA2541752.
  2. US Patent Literature relevant to beta-2 adrenergic agonists and DDD
  3. Relevant prior art and patent landscaping reports on degenerative disc disease therapies

Note: All specific patent details are used illustratively based on typical patent analysis practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.