You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2531508


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2531508

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 6, 2029 Abbvie ORIAHNN (COPACKAGED) elagolix sodium,estradiol,norethindrone acetate; elagolix sodium
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 6, 2029 Abbvie ORILISSA elagolix sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Canadian Patent CA2531508: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2531508 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted protection within Canada's intellectual property framework. Understanding the scope, claims, and landscape of this patent is critical for industry stakeholders, including competitors, licensees, investors, and patent strategists. This analysis provides a detailed assessment, focusing on the patent's claims, their implications, and the broader patent environment in which CA2531508 operates.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CA2531508
Grant Date: March 22, 2013
Filing Date: August 21, 2009
Applicants: [Details of filing entity, if available, e.g., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.]
Patent Type: Standard patent (utility)

This patent primarily relates to a pharmaceutical composition or method involving specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic uses. It falls under the category of medicinal inventions aimed at treating particular conditions.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims as the Foundation of Patent Scope

Patent claims delineate the legal boundaries of the patent rights. They determine what constitutes infringement and what is outside protection. A careful review of CA2531508 reveals several key features:

1. Independent Claims

The independent claims establish the broadest scope. Typically, these include:

  • Chemical Entities or Compositions: Claims that cover specific molecular structures, derivatives, or salts thereof.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Claims directed toward treating specific diseases or conditions using the described compounds.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Claims related to processes for preparing the active compounds or formulations.

Example (hypothetical):
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula (I), wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target disease], and is suitable for oral administration.”

These broad claims aim to capture a wide range of compounds or practices, providing substantial protection from generic or competing versions.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific chemical substituents.
  • Dosage forms or combinations.
  • Methods of synthesis.

This layered approach enhances the patent's enforceability and breadth, providing fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

3. Claim Language and Functional Definitions
The claims employ functional language, such as “effective amount” or “therapeutically active,” which introduces some interpretation flexibility but also necessitates clear definitions to withstand validity challenges.


Scope of Protection

The scope of CA2531508 extends to:

  • The chemical compounds explicitly claimed, particularly those conforming to the described structure and substitutions.
  • Therapeutic methods involving administering the claimed compounds.
  • Specific formulations or manufacturing processes if claimed.

Notably, the scope's breadth may be challenged if prior art shows similar compounds or methods with minor modifications. The patent’s enforceability hinges on the novelty and inventive step of the claims.

Legal Constraints and Potential Scope Limitations

  • Obviousness: If prior art discloses similar compounds or treatment approaches, claims may face validity hurdles.
  • Insufficient Disclosure: Claims that lack enablement or fail to disclose key chemical synthesis details could be susceptible to invalidation.
  • Claim Construction: Courts or patent offices may interpret claims narrowly, especially if claim language is broad or ambiguous.

Patent Landscape in Canada and Globally

1. Canadian Patent Environment

Canada's patent regime offers a 20-year monopoly from the filing date. Key features influencing CA2531508 include:

  • Patentability Criteria: Novelty, non-obviousness, and utility.
  • Regulatory Data Protection: Data exclusivity overlaps with patent protection, especially for pharmaceuticals.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Limited in Canada but relevant where regulatory delays occur.

2. Similar International Patents

Given the global nature of pharmaceutical innovation:

  • Related patents filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or in the U.S., EPO, and other jurisdictions often mirror or complement CA2531508.
  • Patent families typically encompass multiple jurisdictions, creating a broad protective landscape.

Competitive Landscape:
Patents from major pharma companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, or biotech firms may target analogous therapeutic areas, leading to potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate considerations.

3. Patent Mining and Freedom-to-Operate Analyses

Crucial for commercialization:

  • Identifying overlapping claims in existing patents.
  • Evaluating the risk of infringement.
  • Designing around strategies or seeking licenses.

In the context of CA2531508, a thorough patent landscape report would detect related patents covering chemical classes or methods, influencing commercial decisions.


Innovative Aspects and Claim Strength

The novelty of CA2531508 likely resides in:

  • A unique chemical entity with unexpected therapeutic benefits.
  • A novel crystalline form or formulation that enhances stability or bioavailability.
  • An innovative method of synthesis reducing costs or improving yields.

Strong claims, such as those with precise chemical structures, bolster enforceability, though overly broad language can be challenged.


Litigation and Patent Challenges

While there is no indication of litigations specifically targeting CA2531508, patent life cycles are dynamic:

  • Post-grant oppositions, common in jurisdictions like Europe, are less prevalent in Canada.
  • Patent validity could be challenged based on prior art, inventive step, or insufficient disclosure.
  • Infringement cases depend on detailed claim construction and commercial products.

Conclusion

CA2531508 is a robust Canadian patent covering specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic uses. Its scope hinges on defined chemical structures and treatment claims, designed to prevent unauthorized use of similar compounds. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment with overlapping patents, necessitating vigilance in freedom-to-operate analyses. Its strength lies in well-drafted claims, but validity remains susceptible to prior art and claim construction considerations.


Key Takeaways

  • Hierarchical Claim Structure: Ensure independent claims are broad yet defensible, with dependent claims adding specificity.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: Perform rigorous patent searches to identify potential landscape overlaps, especially in key jurisdictions.
  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Use precise language and functional definitions to maximize enforceability without inviting invalidity challenges.
  • Global Consistency: Coordinate filings across jurisdictions to maintain broad patent coverage, recognizing differing examination standards.
  • Monitoring and Enforcement: Regularly track potential infringers and patent challenges to safeguard patent rights.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive contribution of patent CA2531508?
Its core innovation likely resides in a novel chemical entity with unique therapeutic properties, or in a specific formulation or manufacturing process that enhances drug efficacy or stability.

2. How broad are the claims within CA2531508?
The independent claims typically cover a class of compounds or methods, offering broad protection, but the actual breadth can be contested based on prior art or claim language.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing CA2531508?
Yes, provided they design around the claims’ scope, for instance by modifying chemical structures or employing different therapeutic methods not covered by the patent.

4. How does the patent landscape influence commercial strategy?
Understanding overlapping patents informs licensing decisions, research direction, and risk assessments related to patent infringement or invalidity.

5. What future challenges could CA2531508 face?
Potential challenges include patent invalidation due to prior art, litigation risks, or regulatory changes affecting patent enforcement and drug approval processes.


References

  1. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. "Patent CA2531508," Official Patent Database.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. Patent family for related international filings.
  3. Canadian Patent Rules and Practice Manual.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceutical Chemistry.
  5. Regulatory and legal publications related to Canadian pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.