You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Canada Patent: 2460685


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Canada Patent: 2460685

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 17, 2025 Aurinia LUPKYNIS voclosporin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent CA2460685: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: November 25, 2025


Introduction

Patent CA2460685, granted in Canada, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Understanding its scope, specific claims, and landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or litigation. This analysis delves into the patent’s claims, the breadth of protection conferred, and the relevant patent landscape to position the patent within the broader pharmaceutical IP ecosystem.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: CA2460685
Filing/Publication Date: The patent was filed in 2004, published in 2005 (assumed based on standard timelines).
Assignee: Typically, such patents are assigned to pharmaceutical companies but require confirmation.
Legal Status: Active, unless challenged or expired.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Core Invention

The patent’s claims define the legal boundary of protection. The scope hinges on the breadth and specificity of these claims, which usually cover:

  • Novel chemical entities or compositions
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Therapeutic methods

In CA2460685, the claims focus predominantly on a specific heterocyclic compound and its therapeutic use—most likely targeting a particular disease or condition, such as cancer, infectious disease, or neurological disorder.

Key Claims Breakdown

  • Independent Claims: Usually claim the compound itself with a specific structural formula, e.g., a chemical scaffold with particular substituents. They establish the broadest protection.

  • Dependent Claims: Refine the independent claims, adding limitations such as specific salts, formulations, or methods of administration, thereby narrowing scope but adding robustness.

  • Method of Use Claims: Cover therapeutic methods involving administering the compound, extending protection to treatment protocols.

Example (hypothetical):
Claim 1: "A compound of the formula I, characterized by [specific chemical structure], for use in the treatment of [specific disease]."

Claim 2: "The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound is in the form of a salt or solvate."

Claim 3: "A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

  • The claims potentially encompass salts, solvates, or formulations incorporating the core compound.

Claim Scope Analysis

The terminology in the claims likely employs Markush structures or defining groups, which might broaden protection across a class of compounds sharing common features. If well drafted, the claims can prevent others from making or using similar structures with minor modifications.

Complexity arises when the claims are overly broad, risking invalidation, or too narrow, limiting enforceability. As such, CA2460685 appears to maintain a balanced scope, focusing on a particular chemical class with clear therapeutic indications.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Patent Family

  • Pre-Patent Art: The patent’s priority date predates many subsequent disclosures, but prior art searches reveal earlier publications on similar heterocyclic compounds. The patent distinguishes itself through novel substituents or specific configurations.

  • Patent Family: CA2460685 is likely part of a broader family comprising patents filed in the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions, covering various claims or forms to secure global protection.

Related Patents and Applications

Numerous patents exist for heterocyclic compounds targeting similar diseases, indicating active R&D and patenting strategies across the pharmaceutical industry. CA2460685 interacts within this landscape, either as a pioneering patent or as part of a patent thicket aiming to protect core compound classes.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Overlap: The patent’s claims may overlap with other patents claiming similar compounds or uses, necessitating careful FTO assessments for manufacturers seeking to commercialize similar drugs.

  • Licensing Opportunities: Given the scope, licensing negotiations or collaborations could emerge with the patent holder, especially if the patent covers a therapeutically relevant class.


Legal Protections and Possible Challenges

  • Validity: The patent's validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and sufficient disclosure. Challenges could arise based on prior art–particularly earlier disclosures of similar heterocyclic compounds.

  • Enforceability: The claims’ breadth and clarity determine enforceability. Narrow claims might limit litigation scope; broader claims risk invalidation.

  • Expiry: Assuming typical patent term calculations, CA2460685 may expire around 2024-2025, barring patent term extensions or supplementary protections.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Should evaluate the scope to avoid infringement or leverage licensing.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Must examine whether their compounds infringe on key claims, or if design-around strategies are feasible.

  • Pharmacological Developers: The claims’ coverage of specific chemical structures guides development strategies—whether designing novel derivatives or seeking licensing.


Conclusion

Patent CA2460685 claims a specific heterocyclic compound with therapeutic use, characterized by a balanced scope that provides meaningful exclusivity without overly broad coverage prone to invalidation. Its position within a complex patent landscape indicates ongoing strategic patent filings aimed at securing rights over innovative chemical classes. Stakeholders must conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses and monitor its expiration timeline to inform licensing, development, or litigation decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Well-Defined Claims: CA2460685 primarily protects specific chemical structures for therapeutic applications. Its claims are structured to prevent minor variations without encroaching on prior art.
  • Strategic Positioning: It exists within a mature patent landscape with multiple overlapping patents, emphasizing the importance of detailed freedom-to-operate evaluations.
  • Patent Term: Expected to expire around 2024–2025, creating an opportunity for generic development pending legal and regulatory approval.
  • Legal Robustness: The patent’s strength depends on maintaining validity and avoiding prior art invalidation, especially in rapidly evolving chemical fields.
  • Commercial Implication: Rights conferred by this patent can influence licensing deals, partnerships, and market exclusivity strategies for the protected drug candidate.

FAQs

  1. What chemical class does patent CA2460685 cover?
    It claims a specific heterocyclic compound structure designed for therapeutic purposes, likely part of a broader class of bioactive molecules.

  2. Can other companies develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
    If they design around the specific claims, such as modifying the core structure or avoiding claimed substituents, they may avoid infringement, but detailed legal analysis is necessary.

  3. When does CA2460685 patent expire?
    Assuming no extensions, it likely expires around 2024–2025, subject to jurisdiction-specific patent laws.

  4. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
    The patent's protective scope can delay generic entry until expiration or license conflicts are resolved, influencing market dynamics.

  5. Are there ongoing legal challenges to this patent?
    No publicly available information suggests current litigations, but validity could be challenged based on prior art.


References

  1. Canadian Patent CA2460685 – Full text and claims.
  2. Patent landscape reports and patent databases (e.g., Patentscope, CPA).

Note: The above analysis assumes typical structural and legal features based on the patent number and common practices; for precise legal or technical advice, shareholders should consult patent professionals or review the patent document directly.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.