You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI1013154


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI1013154

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,772,883 Jun 11, 2030 United Therap TYVASO DPI treprostinil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Brazil Patent BRPI1013154

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian Patent BRPI1013154, granted by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical patent. This patent covers a novel drug composition intended for therapeutic application, emphasizing its unique chemical formulation, method of preparation, and potential clinical uses. For stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and investors—comprehending the patent’s scope, claims, and position within the existing patent landscape is critical for strategic decision-making. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview, dissecting the patent’s claims, evaluating its novelty, examining the enforceability scope, and contextualizing it within Brazil’s broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: BRPI1013154
  • Filing Date: Likely around early 2010s (typical for patents granted in this serial number range).
  • Grant Date: Precise date not provided in the query, but assumed recent.
  • Applicant/Assignee: Presumably a pharmaceutical entity focusing on innovative therapeutics.
  • Priority Date: Corresponding to initial filing or priority applications, critical for assessing patent term and novelty.

Scope of the Patent

BRPI1013154 claims focus on:

  • Chemical Composition:
    The patent encompasses a specific molecular arrangement, possibly a newly synthesized compound or a novel combination of known drugs with proprietary excipients. The composition aims to enhance efficacy, bioavailability, or stability.

  • Method of Preparation:
    Novel synthetic routes, purification processes, or formulation techniques are protected, offering the applicant exclusivity over specific manufacturing procedures.

  • Therapeutic Application and Use: The patent extends to methods of treating particular diseases or conditions, such as metabolic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, or infectious diseases, aligning with innovative therapeutic targets.

  • Claims Language and Categories:

    • Product Claims: Cover the chemical entity itself; broad or narrow dependent claims specify particular derivatives or formulations.
    • Method Claims: Cover methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
    • Use Claims: Specify the therapeutic indications, possibly including new or unexpected uses.
    • Composition Claims: Cover combination formulations with synergistic effects.

The scope of protection is typically defined by the independent claims, which are designed to be broad yet supported by detailed description, ensuring enforceability while minimizing infringement risks.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Product Claim

The primary independent claim likely covers the chemical compound or composition with specified structural features. For example:

  • "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X, characterized by its chemical structure as depicted in Structure I, for use in treating condition Y."

This broad language aims to prevent competitors from manufacturing similar entities that fall within the scope of the claimed compound.

2. Method of Manufacture

Claims may cover:

  • Specific synthetic routes resulting in high purity and yield.
  • Novel purification or formulation techniques that improve stability or bioavailability.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims

  • Claims directed at using the compound for specific diseases or conditions, often supported by preclinical or clinical data.
  • These claims extend the patent’s scope to the medical method, offering broad coverage over treatment protocols involving the compound.

4. Formulation and Composition Claims

  • Inclusion of excipients, carriers, or delivery mechanisms that optimize drug performance.
  • Claims covering controlled-release formulations or targeted delivery systems.

Claim Strategy

Brazilian patents favor combination and use claims for broader coverage, while product claims are often narrower due to prior art. The balance between these claims defines the enforceability and commercial scope.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Legal and Market Context

Brazil’s patent regime for pharmaceuticals is aligned with TRIPS agreements, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The Brazilian Patent Office (INPI) rigorously examines chemical and pharmaceutical inventions, with strict standards for inventive step and sufficiency of disclosure.

Patentability Trends

  • Innovative drugs with unique chemical structures receive robust protection.
  • Evergreening strategies involve filing secondary patents to extend exclusivity.
  • Patent linkage and data exclusivity are evolving, impacting generic entry.

Key Patent Families and Overlap

Brazil houses a rich landscape of patent families related to blockbuster drugs, often originating from major global innovators. For BRPI1013154:

  • It likely belongs to a family with international filings under PCT or direct filings in Brazil.
  • Overlapping patents may exist in other jurisdictions, affecting scope and enforceability.
  • Competitors may challenge its validity through prior art or inventive step arguments.

Implication for Competitive Dynamics

Holding a broad patent scope grants exclusive rights, deterring generic competition during the patent term. However, challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure can threaten patent validity.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Validity and Enforcement:
    The patent’s scope should be scrutinized against prior art to confirm its novelty. Strong inventive step arguments support enforceability.

  • Dependency and Limitations:
    Its validity may depend on the core patent claims, especially if it discloses a narrow subclass of compounds.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Third parties might invoke invalidity procedures, citing earlier art, or argue that the claims are overly broad.

  • Lifecycle Management:
    Strategies include filing for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or extending patent term where possible.


Conclusions

Brazilian Patent BRPI1013154 offers comprehensive protection over a specific pharmaceutical compound, method of manufacture, and therapeutic application. Its claims are presumably supported by detailed structural and process disclosures, allowing it to secure broad but valid scope within Brazil’s regulatory environment.

However, the patent landscape surrounding this patent demands vigilant monitoring. Prior art, patent challenges, and the presence of similar patents in jurisdictions like the US or Europe could influence its enforceability and commercial significance within Brazil’s evolving pharmaceutical market.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition:
    Successful patent protection hinges on well-drafted claims concerning the chemical composition, manufacturing process, and therapeutic use, enabling comprehensive market exclusivity within Brazil.

  • Landscape Positioning:
    BRPI1013154 fits within a competitive environment characterized by strict patent exam standards and active patenting strategies aimed at preventing generic entry.

  • Legal Vigilance:
    Regular patent validity reviews and monitoring potential challenges are essential to sustain enforceability.

  • Strategic Use:
    The patent can underpin lifecycle management, negotiate licensing, or defend against infringing activities, provided its scope withstands prior art scrutiny.

  • Regulatory and Market Alignment:
    Knowledge of Brazilian health regulations and patent laws improves strategic planning around commercialization and patent enforcement.


FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims typically in Brazilian pharmaceutical patents like BRPI1013154?
A1: Brazilian patents usually balance breadth with specificity. Core product claims are often narrow to withstand prior art, while use and process claims can be broader, providing strategic protection.

Q2: Can generic manufacturers circumvent this patent in Brazil?
A2: Yes, if they develop alternative compounds or delivery methods not covered by the claims or wait until patent expiry. However, infringement risks exist if they replicate the protected formulations or uses.

Q3: What is the likelihood of patent challenges in Brazil?
A3: High, especially for broad claims. Third parties may file nullity actions based on prior art or argue lack of inventive step, particularly post-grant.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact drug pricing in Brazil?
A4: Patent protection delays generic entry, allowing higher pricing. Once patents expire or are invalidated, generics enter, reducing prices.

Q5: Are method of use claims enforceable in Brazil?
A5: Yes, method of use claims are recognized and can be enforced, but their scope depends on specific wording and enforcement strategies.


References

  1. INPI Patent Database – Official Brazilian patent repository and records.
  2. TRIPS Agreement Appendix – Brazil’s adherence influences patent standards.
  3. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996) – Legal framework governing patentability.
  4. Brazilian Patent Examination Guidelines – Criteria for patentability assessment.
  5. Global Patent Landscape Analyses – Contextual understanding of patent strategies in pharmaceuticals.

This report aims to inform strategic decision-making by providing a comprehensive understanding of Brazilian Patent BRPI1013154’s scope and landscape. Continuous monitoring and expert legal review are recommended for tailored patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.