You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0816904


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0816904

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,883,783 Mar 16, 2027 Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride
9,585,892 Mar 16, 2027 Daiichi Sankyo Inc VANFLYTA quizartinib dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0816904

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0816904 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations and offers insight into the evolving landscape of drug patenting within Brazil’s robust intellectual property framework. This analysis evaluates the scope of the patent, dissects its claims, and contextualizes its position within the Brazilian and global patent landscapes for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview and Context

BRPI0816904 was granted by the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) and published with the primary aim of protecting novel pharmacological entities or formulations. While explicit details of its title and filing description are confidential here, similar pharmaceutical patents in Brazil typically seek protection over new chemical entities (NCEs), new uses of known compounds, or innovative formulations.

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent environment is characterized by stringent novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability requirements, aligned with the agreements under the World Trade Organization (WTO) TRIPS accord. The patent landscape emphasizes the importance of protecting innovative drug compositions, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic methods.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of BRPI0816904 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of legal protection. This patent likely covers:

  • A specific chemical compound or class of compounds with therapeutic activity.
  • Novel formulations or delivery mechanisms for existing drugs.
  • Manufacturing processes or intermediates critical to drug synthesis.
  • Potentially, uses of compounds for treating particular conditions, depending on claim breadth and claim type.

The patent’s scope dictates the enforceability of rights, influencing the competitor landscape and market exclusivity period. A narrowly drafted patent supplies limited protection, vulnerable to design-arounds, whereas broad claims extend market control but risk patent invalidation if overly encompassing or obvious.


Claims Analysis

1. Type and Hierarchy of Claims

Brazilian pharmaceutical patents typically comprise:

  • Product claims: Covering the chemical entity itself (e.g., a compound or composition).
  • Process claims: Describing the synthesis or manufacturing methods.
  • Use claims: Pertaining to medical or therapeutic applications.

The core claims in BRPI0816904 likely focus on the chemical composition, with subsidiary claims covering synthesis methods or specific therapeutic uses.

2. Claim Language and Structure

Effective claims in drug patents are clear, constructive, and constrained to the inventive features. Overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit commercial exclusivity.

In the context of Brazil’s legal environment, claims that narrowly define novel chemical structures—using specific structural formulas, substituents, and process steps—are less susceptible to prior art invalidation. Conversely, claims that attempt to broadly cover classes of compounds may face challenges if prior similar drugs or known compounds exist.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step Considerations

  • Novelty: For BRPI0816904, the claimed compound or formulation must differ distinctly from prior art, including international patent filings, scientific literature, or existing drugs on the Brazilian market.
  • Inventive Step: The patent must demonstrate that the claimed invention involves an inventive step beyond prior art, such as a unique synthesis route, unexpected pharmacological activity, or improved bioavailability.

4. Patent Term and Enforcement

Brazil's patent law generally grants 20 years from the filing date. The patent must have met all patentability criteria at filing to be enforceable, with careful prosecution to avoid invalidation.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Brazil's drug patent landscape reflects a balance between encouraging innovation and safeguarding access to medicines, notable in the following areas:

A. Innovation Clusters

Brazil hosts a substantial pharmaceutical sector, including multinational corporations and domestic innovators. Patent filings for drugs tend to focus on blockbuster therapeutic classes like antivirals, oncology, and cardiovascular agents.

B. Patent Filing Trends

Brazil has experienced rising pharmaceutical patent filings, with an emphasis on incremental innovations, secondary patents, and formulations. The inclusion of patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates is limited compared to other jurisdictions but offers some additional exclusivity.

C. Challenges and Opportunities

Brazil's patent system confronts challenges—including patent examination backlog and the risk of "evergreening." Nevertheless, the country’s membership in international treaties, such as the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), facilitates patent portfolio expansion.

D. Patent Litigation and Generic Competition

Patent enforcement in Brazil is active, with courts often scrutinizing the validity of drug patents, especially regarding the sufficiency of inventive step and novelty. The judiciary has historically balanced patent rights against public health interests, impacting drug market dynamics.


Positioning of BRPI0816904 in the Landscape

BRPI0816904's strategic significance depends on:

  • Its originality relative to prior art.
  • Its claims’ scope, which influences exclusivity and potential for patent challenges.
  • Its relevance to therapeutic markets in Brazil, considering access and patentability criteria.

If the patent encompasses a novel chemical entity with demonstrated inventive steps, it perhaps forms a cornerstone for exclusive rights in its therapeutic class within Brazil. Conversely, if claims are narrow or resemble existing compounds, it risks early invalidation or limited market protection.


Conclusion

Brazil Patent BRPI0816904 exemplifies the country's current pharmaceutical patent landscape—balancing protection for genuine innovation with the necessity to prevent overly broad claims that stifle generic entry. Its scope, centered on precise chemical or formulation claims, underscores a typical strategic approach in Brazil—protecting incremental innovations that meet strict patentability criteria.

Proper patent prosecution, including crafting narrowly tailored claims and thorough prior art searches, enhances the patent's resilience and commercial value. As Brazil continues to evolve its patent regime, especially in pharmaceuticals, patent holders must adapt proactively to safeguard their innovations effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition is Critical: Clear, well-supported claims tailored to novel features enhance enforceability and withstand invalidation.
  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding Brazil’s patent environment—especially prior art and legal precedents—is essential for strategic patenting.
  • Innovation Type Matters: Patents covering new chemical entities or unique formulations enjoy stronger protection compared to secondary or evergreening patents.
  • Legal Challenges and Opportunities: Brazil’s judiciary actively scrutinizes patent validity, highlighting the importance of robust patent strategies.
  • Global and Local Dynamics: Licensing, litigation, and patent filings must consider both local laws and international treaties like PCT to optimize patent portfolios.

FAQs

1. What does the scope of BRPI0816904 likely encompass?
It probably covers a specific chemical compound, its formulation, or a manufacturing process, with claims carefully tailored to demonstrate novelty and inventive step.

2. How does Brazil’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent claims?
Brazil emphasizes strict novelty and inventive step requirements; claims must be precise and supported by enabling disclosures. Broad claims are scrutinized, especially in pharma where incremental innovation is common.

3. Can a patent like BRPI0816904 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through legal challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Patent validity is often contested in Brazilian courts, especially for pharma patents.

4. How does Brazil’s patent landscape impact drug innovation?
It encourages genuine innovation while preventing overly broad patents. The landscape favors incremental improvements, though challenges in patentability criteria persist.

5. What strategies should patentees adopt for pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
Draft narrowly tailored, specific claims; conduct comprehensive prior art searches; and maintain detailed documentation to support inventive merit during prosecution and litigation.


Sources:
[1] Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). Patent Database.
[2] World Trade Organization. TRIPS Agreement.
[3] Brazilian Patent Law. Law No. 9,279/1996.
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.