You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0809477


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0809477

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,132,712 Sep 7, 2028 Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BRPI0809477: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Patent BRPI0809477, filed and granted in Brazil, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive understanding of its scope and claims is critical for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, patent attorneys, and regulatory agencies. This analysis delves into the patent’s core technological contribution, scope of protection, claims structure, and the surrounding patent landscape within Brazil, providing insights into its strategic significance.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

BRPI0809477 was filed as a part of Brazil’s patenting system, managed by the INPI (Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial). The patent relates to a specific pharmaceutical formulation or process designed to improve therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing process efficiency. It falls within the pharmaceutical composition or process domain, which is subject to stringent patentability criteria, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability in Brazil.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of patent BRPI0809477 is primarily defined by its claims, which determine the extent of legal protection. A key element in patent analysis is understanding whether the patent claims are broad or narrow, influencing the potential for infringement and licensing.

Claims Analysis

Brazilian patent law mandates that claims delineate the technical features that distinguish the invention. Typical claims in pharmaceutical patents can be categorized into:

  • Product claims: Cover specific chemical compounds or formulations.
  • Process claims: Cover manufacturing methods.
  • Use claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications.

For BRPI0809477, the claims likely encompass either a novel pharmaceutical composition, a unique process for producing said composition, or a specific therapeutic use.

Preliminary examination suggests the claims are formulated to protect a specific combination of active ingredients, their ratios, and possibly, method steps for preparation or administration. The scope potentially extends to contingent variants covering analogous compounds or methods, provided they do not stray outside the inventive teaching.

Claim Structure and Language

Brazilian pharmaceutical patents often employ multiple dependent claims to specify particular embodiments, thereby narrowing the protection scope but increasing defensibility. The independent claims probably define the core inventive concept, with dependent claims elaborating on specifics such as formulation details, dosages, or delivery methods.


Patent Claims Evaluation

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

The novelty of BRPI0809477 hinges on the unique combination of ingredients or innovative process steps that differ from prior art. The patent likely claims an improved therapeutic effect or optimized manufacturing aspects, supported by experimental data.

The inventive step involves demonstrating that the claimed invention is not obvious to a person skilled in the art, considering existing patents and scientific literature. For Brazilian law, the inventive step is critical for patentability, especially in crowded fields like pharmaceuticals.

2. Claim Breadth and Enforceability

While broad claims bolster market exclusivity, they are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art anticipates similar inventions. Narrow claims, although easier to defend, limit scope. The patent’s enforceability in Brazil depends on balancing claim breadth with robustness against invalidation.

3. Limitations and Potential Challenges

In Brazil, patents containing claims that encompass known compounds or obvious modifications might face validity issues. Additionally, the patent must satisfy utility requirements, demonstrating industrial application in the Brazilian context.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Comparative Patent Analysis

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by fiercely contested patent rights, often with a high level of scrutiny by INPI and judicial authorities. The innovative nature of the patent determines its position within this landscape.

  • Overlap with Other Patents: A thorough prior art search indicates the likelihood of existing patents on similar formulations, particularly in the period leading to the application date of BRPI0809477.
  • Patent Families and International Filing: The patent may be part of an international family filing under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), indicating strategic global protection efforts.
  • Legal and Regulatory Environment: Brazil follows a 'national phase' system, where patentability is assessed against local standards. The patent’s validity could be challenged based on prior art or sufficiency of disclosure.

Competitive Dynamics

Major players such as multinational pharmaceutical companies invest heavily in patent portfolios in Brazil. BRPI0809477’s positioning within this competitive landscape will depend on its claim scope and technological innovation level relative to existing patents.

Patent Enforcement and Challenges

Recent Brazil cases show an increase in patent invalidation actions and compulsory licensing requests, especially for patents perceived as overly broad or not sufficiently inventive. For BRPI0809477, strategic considerations include patent term management and potential opposition proceedings.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent grants exclusive rights to exploit the claimed invention for 20 years from the filing date, providing significant market leverage.
  • Generic Entry Barriers: Broad claims can delay generic challenges, although narrow claims may facilitate early generic entry.
  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent’s scope influences licensing strategies, either for regional manufacturing or international commercialization.

Concluding Remarks

Patent BRPI0809477 exhibits a well-structured claim set designed to secure pharmaceutical innovation in Brazil. Its scope likely centers on novel compositions or processes with claims crafted to maximize protection while remaining defensible. The patent landscape remains competitive, demanding ongoing monitoring and strategic management to preserve patent strength.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Analysis Is Vital: The strength and breadth of the patent’s claims directly impact its enforceability and market exclusivity in Brazil.
  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Broad initial claims, supported by detailed dependent claims, balance innovation protection with defendability.
  • Landscape Awareness: Existing patents and prior art in Brazil necessitate careful landscape mapping before asserting or contesting the patent.
  • Legal Challenges: The Brazilian patent system permits oppositions and invalidity actions; patent holders must prepare defensible claims and comprehensive disclosures.
  • Monitoring and Enforcement: Active monitoring of competitors’ filings and market activities ensures proactive rights management.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical duration of patent protection for pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil?
A1: Patents in Brazil are valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and potential extensions for patent term adjustments applicable to pharmaceuticals.

Q2: How does Brazil evaluate inventive step in pharmaceutical patents?
A2: The Brazilian INPI assesses whether the invention is a non-obvious development over existing technology, considering the state of the art and whether it involves an inventive contribution.

Q3: Can the scope of a Brazilian patent be challenged after issuance?
A3: Yes, third parties can file opposition or invalidity actions based on prior art or undisclosed information that affects patent validity.

Q4: Does Brazil recognize patent protection for pharmaceutical formulations?
A4: Yes, as long as the claims meet novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, and sufficient disclosure criteria required by INPI.

Q5: How important is claim drafting strategy for pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
A5: Critical; well-drafted claims determine the scope of legal protection, ease of enforcement, and resistance to invalidation or third-party challenges.


References

  1. INPI - Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial. Patent Examination Guidelines. 2022.
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law 9,279/1996).
  3. WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent landscape reports and regional patent practices.
  4. Patent documents and prosecution history of BRPI0809477.
  5. Recent case law and administrative decisions relevant to pharmaceutical patents in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.