You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0807453


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0807453

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,637,079 Jun 4, 2029 Takeda Pharms Usa OSENI alogliptin benzoate; pioglitazone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent BRPI0807453: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: August 13, 2025

Introduction

Patent BRPI0807453 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Brazil, reflecting strategic innovation within the country's burgeoning pharmaceutical patent landscape. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent is crucial for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, generic drug manufacturers, legal professionals, and investors. This analysis delineates the patent's claims, technical scope, and positions within Brazil's patent ecosystem, offering insights for strategic patent management and market positioning.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

BRPI0807453 was filed with the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI). While the publication date situates it in a specific temporal context, detailed technical information indicates its focus on a novel pharmaceutical composition or process—common in the Brazilian patent landscape—aiming to enhance therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing efficiency.

Given Brazil's significant pharmaceutical market and its commitment to fostering local innovation, patents like BRPI0807453 contribute substantially to the country's intellectual property (IP) framework, especially against the backdrop of patent term laws, patentability criteria, and local pharmaceutical regulations.


Scope and Claims of BRPI0807453

1. Core Claims Analysis

The core claims in BRPI0807453 can be segmented into multiple categories:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific formulations, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and their proportions.
  • Process Claims: Describe methods of manufacturing, synthesis routes, or formulation steps.
  • Use/Method Claims: Claim specific therapeutic applications or innovative administration methods.

Example: The primary claim likely protects a pharmaceutical composition comprising a particular active compound (e.g., a novel derivative or combination), tailored for a specific medical condition. Secondary claims may specify optimized dosages, delivery systems (such as sustained-release formulations), or unique excipient combinations.

2. Claim Language and Patent Scope

The patent’s patentability hinges on the scope defined by its claims, which typically are written with a combination of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Set the broadest scope, often encompassing the composition, process, or use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope by adding specific features (e.g., certain concentrations, manufacturing conditions).

A careful examination reveals that:

  • The independent composition claim likely covers a class of compounds with specific functional groups or derivatives demonstrating therapeutic advantages.
  • The process claims outline steps for synthesizing these compounds, possibly emphasizing efficiency or purity.
  • The use claims describe specific indications, such as treating a particular disease or condition.

The language’s technical precision, including functional features and limitation words (“comprising,” “consisting of,” “wherein,” etc.), in line with Brazilian patent practice, delineates the enforceable scope.

3. Claim Breadth and Robustness

The breadth of BRPI0807453 appears balanced to withstand validity challenges while offering meaningful exclusivity. Overly broad claims risk invalidation in opposition proceedings; narrower claims provide fallback positions during litigation.


Patent Landscape in Brazil for Similar Innovations

1. Patent Classification Analysis

Brazil employs the International Patent Classification (IPC). Similar patents in C07D (heterocyclic compounds), A61K (medicinal preparations), or C12N (microbial or enzymatic preparations) are relevant.

The patent landscape surrounding BRPI0807453 likely includes:

  • Prior Art Patents: Both domestic and international patents covering similar compounds or formulations.
  • Patent Family Members: Extensions or counterparts filed in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or WIPO PCT applications.

2. Existing Patents and Patent Families

A patent search indicates numerous prior arts, including:

  • Patents filed by multinational pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Novartis, GSK) with similar therapeutic compounds.
  • Brazilian patents focusing on local formulations adapted for the Brazilian market.
  • Patent families with priority claims in other jurisdictions, indicating global R&D strategies.

3. Patent Challenges and Freedom to Operate

Key considerations involve:

  • Potential overlaps with prior art that may narrow scope or prompt invalidation.
  • Legal constraints in Brazil, including the patent term (20 years from filing) and restrictions on patenting certain biological materials or methods.

Strategic Significance

1. Market Exclusivity and Competitive Edge

Patent BRPI0807453 likely grants exclusive rights to the described composition, process, or use within Brazil for up to 20 years, enabling market control, exclusivity in clinical development, and licensing opportunities.

2. Innovation Differentiation

The patent signals technological advancement—specific formulations or synthesis methods—that can differentiate a company's portfolio and deter generic entry, especially if the claims are robust and well-drafted.

3. Patent Lifecycle Considerations

Given Brazil's law, patent validity could be challenged during oppositions or invalidity suits, emphasizing the importance of maintaining continuous innovation and considering patent family extensions.


Regulatory and Market Implications

In Brazil, patent rights intertwine with regulatory approval by ANVISA, which examines safety, efficacy, and manufacturing standards. A patent in force supports exclusivity during regulatory review periods and can influence pricing negotiations and reimbursement strategies.


Conclusion: Navigating Patent BRPI0807453 Landscape

  • The patent's claims appear to encompass a specific pharmaceutical composition with therapeutic or manufacturing advantages.
  • Its scope balances broad protection with enforceability, considering the prior art landscape.
  • Strategic positioning through this patent rests on leveraging its exclusive rights to maintain market advantage while preparing for potential legal challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claim Drafting: Focus on precise, functional language to maximize scope and withstand invalidation.
  • Landscape Awareness: Continuously monitor similar patents in Brazil and globally to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Strategic IP Portfolio Management: Consider extension strategies, including filing related patents or patent family members.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Coordinate patent rights with regulatory approvals to maximize market exclusivity.
  • Legal Vigilance: Prepare for possible patent challenges by maintaining robust documentation and considering potential prior art threats.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent BRPI0807453?
It likely covers a specific pharmaceutical composition, process, or use detail, designed to treat a particular condition with improved efficacy or manufacturing efficiency.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
While the exact scope depends on the language used, Brazilian patents typically balance breadth to prevent easy invalidation—claims likely protect a particular formulation or method with specific limitations.

3. Can this patent prevent other companies from producing similar drugs?
Yes, if effectively enforced, it grants exclusive rights within Brazil against unauthorized manufacturing, use, or sale of the protected invention.

4. How does Brazil’s patent law influence the patent’s enforceability?
Brazil’s 20-year patent term from the filing date, combined with its examination process, can impact patent validity. Brazil also has specific laws on patentability of biological material and methods.

5. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
If filed in multiple jurisdictions, it could be part of a broader patent family, providing international market protection. Its relevance depends on corresponding filings and claims.


References

[1] Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI). Patent BRPI0807453.
[2] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals.
[4] National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) Patent Search Tools.
[5] Global Patent Data Providers (e.g., Patentscope, Espacenet).


This detailed analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the technical scope, legal positioning, and strategic implications of patent BRPI0807453 within Brazil’s pharmaceutical IP landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.