You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0717067


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0717067

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,268,299 Oct 13, 2029 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
8,323,630 Sep 20, 2027 Sandoz TRAVATAN Z travoprost
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Understanding the Patent Landscape of BRPI0717067 in Brazil: Scope, Claims, and Strategic Implications

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

The patent application BRPI0717067 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within Brazil’s robust intellectual property (IP) system, governed by the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI). Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape offers critical insights for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and research institutions aiming to navigate or leverage this IP effectively. This detailed review provides an evidence-based, strategic examination to inform market entry, licensing, or R&D directions.


I. Overview of BRPI0717067

BRPI0717067 is a patent application (or granted patent, depending on jurisdictional status) focused on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The application’s publication number indicates its filing date and technological filing series, positioning it within Brazil's patent records since approximately 2007 (assuming conventional numbering conventions). The patent's priority data, if available, could reveal underlying prior art or related international filings, aiding comprehensive landscape mapping.


II. Scope of the Patent

The scope of BRPI0717067 defines the boundaries of exclusive rights and determines its enforceability and market impact:

  • Technical Focus: The patent likely covers a specific chemical entity, a novel formulation, or a unique method of manufacturing or administering a pharmaceutical compound. Clarification emerges from detailed claims—these provide the precise boundaries of innovation protected.

  • Claims Structure: Brazil's patent law emphasizes independent and dependent claims, with independent claims articulating the core invention, and dependent claims adding specific embodiments or refinements. A thorough examination involves parsing these claims to understand the scope’s breadth:

    • Compound Claims: If included, these specify molecular structures with particular substituents, stereochemistry, or pharmacophores.

    • Process Claims: Cover manufacturing steps, purification techniques, or formulation processes.

    • Use Claims: Covering therapeutic, diagnostic, or prophylactic applications.

  • Range of Protection: The scope potentially extends to derivatives, salts, or analogous compounds if claims are worded broadly; conversely, narrow claims limit protection, prompting strategic considerations around patent enforcement.


III. Claims Analysis

A detailed claims analysis reveals the patent’s strategic strength:

  • Claim Language and Breadth: Broad claims (e.g., covering a class of compounds with generalized structures) afford extensive protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges. Narrow claims focus on a specific compound or process, providing sharper but limited rights.

  • Key Elements of the Claims:

    • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must delineate features distinct from prior art, such as unique chemical modifications or unexpected therapeutic benefits.

    • Scope of Use: Whether claims cover only specific indications or a broad spectrum influences licensing potential.

  • Claim Dependencies: The hierarchy and dependencies increase the protection depth, with multiple layers guarding various embodiments.

  • Claim Clarity: Well-drafted claims with clear language enhance enforceability and reduce ambiguities, critical for litigation or licensing negotiations.


IV. Patent Landscape in Brazil

Mapping the landscape surrounding BRPI0717067 involves:

  • Prior Art and Related Patents: Examining patents filed prior to or after BRPI0717067 indicates technological convergence, potential for invalidations, or freedom-to-operate considerations.

  • Competitor Analysis: Identifying filings by competitors or research entities reveals the level of innovation activity and potential litigants.

  • Patent Families & Related Applications: Historical data on related filing families provides insight into evolving claims and territorial strategies.

  • Patent Citations: Both patent citations and non-patent literature citations illuminate technological trends, patent quality, and innovation gaps.

  • Legal Status: Confirming whether BRPI0717067 is granted, pending, or expired informs ongoing commercial possibilities.


V. Strategic Implications

The scope and claims of BRPI0717067 have direct consequences:

  • Market Exclusivity: Broad, well-validated claims offer extended exclusivity, deterring generic entry.

  • Liability and Enforcement: Clarity in claims facilitates patent enforcement; ambiguous claims may hinder infringement actions.

  • Research & Development (R&D): Narrow claims or limitations in scope suggest avenues for designing around the patent, fostering competitive R&D.

  • Licensing & Partnering: Understanding the patent’s scope enables strategic licensing negotiations, technology transfer negotiations, or collaborations.

  • Invalidity Risks: Overly broad claims extend risk of invalidation if challenged by prior art. Strategic patent drafting can mitigate this.


VI. Conclusion

The patent application BRPI0717067 exemplifies Brazil’s dynamic pharmaceutical patent landscape, wherein scope and claims intricately determine market and legal standing. A precise understanding of its claims, scope, and surrounding patent circuit enables strategic decision-making—be it R&D planning, licensing, or infringement management.


Key Takeaways

  • The protection scope hinges on the specificity of claims; broad claims provide market leverage but face validity scrutiny.

  • Robust analysis of related patents and prior art is essential for assessing risk and exploring freedom-to-operate.

  • Patent drafting in Brazil must balance broad protection with clarity and novelty to withstand legal challenges.

  • Observing the patent landscape reveals technological trends and potential collaborators or competitors.

  • Active monitoring of patent legal status and citations enhances strategic planning in Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector.


FAQs

  1. What rights does BRPI0717067 confer upon its holder?
    The patent grants exclusive rights to prevent others from manufacturing, using, selling, or importing the claimed invention within Brazil for the patent’s term, typically 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance and legal compliance.

  2. Can BRPI0717067 be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, through mechanisms like opposition or invalidation procedures based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure, especially if prior art demonstrates the claims are not novel or obvious.

  3. What strategic considerations should companies evaluate regarding this patent?
    Companies should assess whether the claims align with their pipeline, evaluate freedom-to-operate, consider licensing opportunities, or plan around narrower claims through innovation.

  4. How does the Brazilian patent landscape compare internationally?
    Brazil’s patent system emphasizes local innovation; patents like BRPI0717067 reflect regional R&D focus, but may be more limited in scope compared to broader international patents unless part of an international patent family.

  5. What is the significance of patent citations surrounding BRPI0717067?
    Citations reveal technological relevance, potential invalidation risks, and innovation trends, providing a broader context for assessing the patent’s strength and positioning.


References

[1] Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI). Patent database records.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PCT or national phase filings referencing BRPI0717067.
[3] Legal analyses and patent law updates specific to Brazil’s pharmaceutical IP regulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.