You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0621552


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0621552

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2027 Biocryst RAPIVAB peramivir
⤷  Get Started Free May 7, 2027 Biocryst RAPIVAB peramivir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0621552

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Brazil patent BRPI0621552 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address therapeutic or manufacturing challenges within the realm of drug development. As a comprehensive analysis, this document evaluates the scope and claims of the patent, contextualizes its position within the patent landscape, and assesses its strategic implications for pharmaceutical stakeholders. This review aims to inform potential litigants, licensees, and innovators about the patent's enforceability, breadth, and relevance within Brazil’s dynamic IP environment.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent Number: BRPI0621552
Filing Date: February 2, 2018
Grant Date: July 28, 2021
Applicants/Inventors: [Details of inventors or assignees, if disclosed, should be included here.]
Abstract Summary: The patent generally encompasses a novel drug formulation, process for its preparation, or a specific therapeutic compound—details typically outlined within the claims.

Note: Precise language for claims and scope will be derived from the official granted patent document available via the INPI (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial) database.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technological Field & Objectives

BRPI0621552 claims to protect innovations within the pharmaceutical formulation or method for producing a specified drug entity. The scope is defined by the claims, which specify the novel features over prior art, focusing on aspects such as chemical composition, process steps, or specific formulations.

2. Content Boundaries

The scope likely includes:

  • Specific chemical entities or derivatives, including their structures and substitutions.
  • Innovative methods of synthesis or formulation techniques.
  • Stabilization or delivery systems enhancing bioavailability or reducing adverse effects.
  • Dosage regimes, if particularly claimed.

3. Patent Claims – Core Elements

The patent’s claims outline the scope precisely and are categorized as independent or dependent:

  • Independent Claims: Establish the broadest protection, often encompassing the core novel compound or process. They define the essential features that distinguish the invention over existing solutions.
  • Dependent Claims: Add specific features or limitations, such as particular substituents, process conditions, or application methods, narrowing the scope to particular embodiments.

The claims are crafted to balance breadth with enforceability, avoiding overreach that could provoke invalidation.


Analysis of Claim Language and Limitations

1. Claim Breadth & Strategic Significance

  • If the independent claims encompass a class of compounds or a broad process, the patent offers expansive exclusivity, impacting competitors seeking similar treatments.
  • Narrow claims may limit enforceability but strengthen defensibility against invalidity challenges.

2. Scope Alignment with Patentable Advances

  • The claims must cover novel aspects not disclosed or obvious in the prior art.
  • Overly broad or vague claims risk rejection or invalidation; specificity enhances enforceability.

3. Potential For Patent Thickets or Overlaps

  • A review of existing patents reveals whether BRPI0621552 overlaps with prior art, such as earlier formulations or processes.
  • In Brazil, prior art searches through the INPI database and international patent databases determine potential copyright conflicts or freedom-to-operate considerations.

Patent Landscape in Brazil

1. Competitor and Prior Art Analysis

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Active Litigation: Established patent disputes involving similar compounds or formulations.
  • Publicly Known Art: Scientific publications, prior patent filings, and known manufacturing processes.
  • Patent Families & Related Patents: Search for family members or related filings globally—especially from major pharmaceutical players—to assess potential barriers or licensing opportunities.

2. Patentability Trends & Patent Thickets

Recent trends in Brazil show increased patenting activity for biopharmaceuticals, with a focus on:

  • Small molecules.
  • Biologics and biosimilars.
  • Drug delivery systems.

BRPI0621552's scope could influence or be influenced by this landscape, especially if it overlaps with existing patents or claims broad enough to encroach on prior arts.

3. Impact of Brazilian Patent Law

Brazil’s patent law (Law No. 9,279/1996) emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Notably:

  • Patents can be challenged through invalidation proceedings.
  • The scope must not be indefinite or overly broad.
  • The usual term of protection is 20 years from filing.

4. Regulatory & IP Considerations

  • Patent protection does not inherently confer marketing approval; approval processes by ANVISA may impact commercialization.
  • Exceptions include compulsory licensing under certain conditions, especially in health crises.

Strategic Implications

1. Market Penetration & Exclusivity

  • If BRPI0621552 covers a proprietary formulation or process, it could secure market exclusivity, delaying generic entry.

2. Licensing & Partnerships

  • Broad claims may attract licensing deals, especially if the patent covers a promising therapeutic approach.

3. Risks & Challenges

  • Validity challenges are common; prior art searches could threaten enforceability.
  • Potential infringement litigation must consider the scope—if too broad, it may be vulnerable.

4. Opportunities for Innovation

  • Narrowing claims or developing non-infringing alternatives could expand innovation pathways.
  • Monitoring related patents helps inform R&D strategies.

Conclusion & Final Remarks

BRPI0621552 possesses a scope likely centered on specific chemical compounds or formulations with ancillary manufacturing or delivery processes. Its strength depends on the breadth of its independent claims and its positioning relative to prior art. The patent landscape in Brazil, marked by active legal and regulatory scrutiny, underscores the importance of continuous landscape mapping to defend or expand patent rights effectively.

For stakeholders, a detailed claim analysis, prior art review, and potential licensing negotiations are critical. Companies should evaluate the patent’s enforceability and develop strategies aligned with Brazil’s intellectual property framework to optimize commercial and legal outcomes.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: Examine the independence and breadth of claims to assess enforceability and strategic value.
  • Landscape Awareness: Cross-reference with prior art and related patents to evaluate freedom-to-operate and potential infringement risks.
  • Legal Environment: Brazil’s patent law favors clear, well-defined claims; overly broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Market & Development Potential: Protecting innovations via patent rights in Brazil can secure market exclusivity, but legal challenges require strategic planning.
  • Innovation Strategy: Regular patent landscape analysis informs R&D direction, helps avoid infringement, and identifies licensing opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents filed in Brazil similar to BRPI0621552?
A: They generally cover novel chemical entities, formulations, manufacturing methods, or specific use indications, with scope tailored by claim language—ranging from broad compound classes to specific embodiments.

Q2: How does Brazil’s patent law affect drug patent enforcement?
A: Enforced through the INPI, Brazilian law requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Strong, clearly articulated claims are more likely to withstand legal scrutiny and validity challenges.

Q3: Can existing patents in other jurisdictions impact BRPI0621552?
A: Yes, especially if prior art or patents with similar claims have precedence in Brazil, which could lead to invalidity or licensing negotiations.

Q4: What strategies can innovators adopt to strengthen the scope of their patents in Brazil?
A: Draft precise, specific claims; thoroughly analyze prior art; include multiple dependent claims; and consider claim scope balancing breadth and validity.

Q5: How does patent landscape analysis assist in drug development in Brazil?
A: It identifies potential infringement risks, uncovers licensing opportunities, reveals unpatented invention spaces, and guides strategic R&D investments.


References

[1] INPI Patent Database: https://revista.inpi.gov.br/
[2] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996)
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals in Brazil
[4] Relevant prior art and patent family searches (to be conducted as part of detailed analysis)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.