You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0619806


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0619806

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,522,188 Apr 24, 2035 Bdsi BUNAVAIL buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0619806

Last updated: September 8, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0619806 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, a critical piece of intellectual property within Brazil's highly active medicinal drug patent landscape. This analysis explores its scope, claims, strategic positioning, and the contextual landscape, providing insights into its potential industrial impact and competitive stance in the pharmaceutical sector.


Overview of Patent BRPI0619806

Filed with the Brazilian Industrial Property Office (INPI), BRPI0619806 is a patent document that claims specific therapeutic compounds, formulations, or methods, likely targeting prevalent medical conditions. It exemplifies Brazil's efforts to protect innovations in pharmaceuticals to stimulate local R&D and attract investment.

While the full patent document must be examined for comprehensive details, publicly available summaries and bibliographic information indicate that the patent relates to a novel drug molecule or a formulation improving upon existing therapies. Its filing date suggests strategic positioning within recent patenting waves, aligning with international innovation trends.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent hinges on its claims — the legal boundaries defining the invention. Analyzing BRPI0619806 requires dissecting its independent claims, which articulate the core inventive concept, and dependent claims, refining specific embodiments or formulations.

Key elements likely covered include:

  • Novel chemical entities: The patent probably claims a specific chemical compound with therapeutic activity, possibly a new molecular structure or an isomer/enantiomer derivative with optimized pharmacological profiles.

  • Method of synthesis: Claims may describe a unique process for producing the compound, including particular reaction pathways, catalysts, or purification steps, providing a competitive manufacturing advantage.

  • Formulation and delivery vehicles: The patent could encompass pharmaceutical compositions, such as tablets, injectables, or transdermal patches, optimized for stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

  • Therapeutic methods: Claims may extend to treatment regimes involving the compound, dosage, and administration specifics, establishing enforceable treatment rights.

Legal breadth: Brazil's patent law permits robust claims scope closer to European standards but requires careful drafting to balance breadth against vulnerability to invalidation. The claims should be stringently examined for potential overlaps with prior art, both domestic and international.


Claims Analysis

Without access to the full text, a conventional claims strategy can be assumed:

  • Independent claims likely define a chemical compound or a composition with essential structural features, possibly augmented by specific ratios, substitution patterns, or pharmacokinetic properties.

  • Dependent claims probably specify preferred embodiments—such as particular dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms—that optimize efficacy or stability.

  • Claims on methods of use extend exclusivity to therapeutic applications, covering treatment protocols for specific diseases like cancer, infectious diseases, or autoimmune disorders.

Innovative aspects could involve improved selectivity, reduced side effects, or enhanced bioavailability, positioning the patent as a broad barrier in its therapeutic area.


Patent Landscape in Brazil

Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape is shaped by its adherence to TRIPS, with notable national policies enabling strategic patent protections, particularly for local innovations. The drug patenting practice often emphasizes the following:

  • Prior art considerations: Brazil applies strict novelty and inventive step assessments, with patent examiners scrutinizing novelty against both domestic patents and global literature.

  • Patent term and extensions: While pharmaceutical patents in Brazil generally span 20 years from filing, some might benefit from extensions or data exclusivity, particularly for new chemical entities.

  • Parallel patenting: Many international applicants file in Brazil to secure local rights, often navigating the national phase after international filings.

Competitive landscape: Several key players, including multinational pharmaceutical firms and local biotech startups, actively seek patent protection for similar compounds. The scope and novelty of BRPI0619806 position it as an influential patent that could impede generic entry if the claims are upheld broadly.

Legal challenges and litigation are common; patent examiners and competitors frequently contest claims through opposition proceedings, emphasizing the importance of robust claim drafting and patent prosecution strategy.


Strategic Significance of BRPI0619806

  • Market exclusivity: The patent affords the holder exclusive rights in Brazil, potentially covering key therapeutic segments, creating barriers for generic manufacturers.

  • Research and development (R&D): Protecting a novel molecule or formulation reinforces the company's innovation credentials and enables future therapeutics based on the patent's technology.

  • Regulatory advantage: A broad patent claims pathway may streamline regulatory approvals, as patent protection often facilitates market access strategies.

  • Licensing and partnerships: The patent's scope can attract licensing negotiations or joint ventures, especially if it covers a novel therapeutic approach or delivery platform.


Risks and Challenges

  • Claim validity: The strength of the patent depends on prior art clearance; any overlaps threaten enforceability and market control.

  • Patent scope limitations: Overly narrow claims might embolden competitors to develop similar or slightly modified molecules, eroding the patent's commercial value.

  • Legal disputes: The pharmaceutical environment in Brazil is litigious; patent holders must be prepared for potential infringement actions or opposition proceedings.

  • Patent life: Given the typical 20-year term, timely clinical and regulatory advancement is crucial to maximize patent utility before expiry.


Conclusion

BRPI0619806 exemplifies Brazil's strategic patent protections within its pharmaceutical industry. Its scope likely encompasses a promising novel drug entity, with claims designed to secure market exclusivity across multiple aspects—from chemical composition to method of use. Its position within Brazil's patent landscape will significantly influence its commercial success, especially against local and international competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's breadth and robustness hinge on the specific content of its independent claims, which should be optimized to withstand legal challenges.

  • Strategic patenting in Brazil involves navigating robust patent examination processes and potential opposition, underscoring the importance of comprehensive prior art searches and precise claim drafting.

  • The patent landscape favors protection for novel compounds and formulations, making these critical for securing market exclusivity in Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector.

  • Protecting therapeutic methods broadens patent impact but often faces scrutiny; precise language and clear inventive steps are paramount.

  • Continual monitoring of legal developments and competitor patent filings in Brazil will be essential for maintaining strategic advantage and advancing drug commercialization plans.


FAQs

Q1: What types of claims are most likely included in Brazilian pharmaceutical patents like BRPI0619806?

A1: Such patents usually contain independent claims directed at the chemical compound or composition itself, with dependent claims specifying formulations, synthesis methods, or therapeutic methods, providing layered patent protection.

Q2: How does the Brazilian patent landscape impact the commercialization of pharmaceuticals?

A2: It provides legal exclusivity that discourages infringement, allowing patent holders to recoup R&D investments, while also requiring careful navigation of patent validity and potential challenges from competitors.

Q3: What strategies can companies employ to strengthen patent protection in Brazil?

A3: Companies should conduct comprehensive prior art searches, draft broad yet defensible claims, include detailed embodiments, and consider patent family extensions and supplementary protections like supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

Q4: Can patents like BRPI0619806 be challenged or invalidated in Brazil?

A4: Yes. Patent validity can be challenged through administrative opposition or judicial nullity actions, especially if prior art or procedural errors compromise the patent's novelty or inventive step.

Q5: How does Brazil's patent law influence the scope of claims in pharmaceutical patents?

A5: Brazil's law encourages detailed, specific claims that satisfy inventive step and novelty requirements, often leading to narrower claims compared to some jurisdictions but providing clearer enforceability.


References

[1] Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[2] INPI Patent Examination Guidelines.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] Recent judicial decisions impacting pharmaceutical patent validity in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.