You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0418228


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0418228

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,862,832 Jun 15, 2028 Cephalon FENTORA fentanyl citrate
7,862,833 Jun 15, 2028 Cephalon FENTORA fentanyl citrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Drug Patent BRPI0418228

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0418228 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted by the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office (INPI). This patent covers a specific formulation or method related to a drug, likely within the therapeutic area of significant commercial or clinical interest. Analyzing the scope and claims of BRPI0418228 offers insight into its inventive scope, potential overlaps, and strategic positioning within the biomedical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

BRPI0418228 was granted in Brazil, with potential priority or filing dates suggesting an initial application possibly filed outside Brazil, such as through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) route or direct national filing. The patent likely encompasses claims aimed at protecting specific formulations, manufacturing processes, or uses associated with a particular drug compound or combination.

Understanding its scope is critical for stakeholders assessing freedom-to-operate (FTO), licensing opportunities, or identifying potential infringement risks. The patent's claims determine the boundaries of exclusivity, and their breadth influences its strength and utility.


Scope of the Patent: Structural and Functional Features

1. Composition Claims

The patent likely claims specific compositions comprising active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, and possibly adjuvants, tailored for particular therapeutic effects or delivery methods. The scope hinges on the specificity of the active ingredients—whether their chemical structure, dosage, or combination is broadly or narrowly claimed.

For example, a composition claim might specify:

  • A drug formulation comprising a particular API (e.g., a novel steroid, antibiotic, or biologic),
  • Certain concentrations or ratios of excipients,
  • Specific manufacturing parameters enhancing stability or bioavailability.

2. Method Claims

Method claims may encompass processes for preparing the drug, methods of administering, or novel therapeutic protocols. These claims typically delineate the procedural steps or treatment regimens, highlighting inventive aspects such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced stability.

3. Use Claims

Use claims could pertain to new therapeutic applications, such as a known compound used for a different indication, or novel dosing regimens. These claims extend protection to the therapeutic application, enabling patent holders to prevent competitors from exploiting specific treatment methods.


Claim Analysis: Breadth and Limitations

The scope and enforceability of BRPI0418228 depend substantially on how its claims are drafted:

  • Broad Claims: May cover generic formulations or methods similar to the patented invention, facilitating extensive protection but risking invalidation if overly broad or obvious over prior art.

  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or processes, potentially easier to defend but vulnerable to design-arounds or minor modifications by competitors.

Key considerations:

  • Claim Dependency: Whether claims are independent or dependent influences hierarchical protection and potential for prosecution amendments.
  • Structural Limitations: Use of specific chemical structures, molecular features, or process parameters indicates a narrow scope, whereas generic language suggests broader claims.
  • Claim Prioritization: Method claims may be narrower but more defensible, while composition claims often provide broader coverage.

Patent Landscape in Brazil for Similar Drugs

Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Strict Patentability Criteria: Compliance with inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability, with particular focus on pharmaceutical efficacy.
  • Data Exclusivity and Compulsory Licensing: Brazil's proximity to patent expiration or statutory exceptions influences the strategic value of patents like BRPI0418228.
  • Third-Party Patent Filings: Increasing filings in areas like biologics, biosimilars, and combination therapies.

Within this landscape, BRPI0418228's uniqueness depends on:

  • Whether the claims cover a narrowly defined chemical entity or a broad class of compounds.
  • The extent of prior art disclosures in Brazil and globally, influencing patent validity and enforcement.
  • Existing local or international patents competing in the same therapeutic class.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The scope of protection provided by BRPI0418228 determines its ability to block generic or biosimilar entrants.
  • Patent Term: Typically 20 years from filing; ongoing patent term extensions may be relevant if data exclusivity applies.
  • Litigation Risks: Narrow claims may be challenged, requiring detailed claim construction analysis.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broader claims enhance market exclusivity but attract scrutiny, whereas narrower claims may facilitate licensing or partnerships.

Comparative Patent Landscape

In addition to BRPI0418228, other patents that may surround or intersect with it include:

  • International patents in the same therapeutic area, especially from major pharmaceutical companies.
  • Brazilian patents with overlapping composition claims or new uses.
  • Foreign patent families covering similar formulations or methods, which may influence enforcement or licensing in Brazil.

Mapping these patents provides a clearer understanding of the competitive environment and opportunities for freedom to operate.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • Patent Strengthening: Review the claims to assess potential for broadening or clarifying language, ensuring enforceability against competitors.
  • Competition Monitoring: Continuously monitor patent filings in Brazil and key jurisdictions to detect emerging patents with overlapping claims.
  • FTO Analysis: Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments considering BRPI0418228's scope, especially before launching new formulations or indications.
  • Licensing & Collaborations: Leverage patent positioning for licensing negotiations or strategic partnerships in Brazil or regional markets.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope of BRPI0418228 hinges on its chemical, process, or use claims, necessitating precise claim language analysis for strategic decision-making.
  • Patent landscape positioning indicates that narrow or broad claims influence enforceability and market exclusivity.
  • Legal landscape in Brazil emphasizes strict patentability standards, impacting the durability of patent rights.
  • Competitive intelligence should focus on overlapping patent rights from global and local entities to maintain a robust patent strategy.
  • Proactive patent management and landscape mapping are essential for navigating Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent environment effectively.

FAQs

1. How can the scope of BRPI0418228 influence its enforceability against generic manufacturers?
The enforceability depends on claim breadth; broad claims can exclude generics efficiently but are more vulnerable to validity challenges, while narrow claims are easier to invalidate or circumvent.

2. What strategies can extend the patent life or strengthen protection in Brazil?
Strategies include pursuing patent term extensions, filing divisional or continuation applications, and actively monitoring patent landscape developments for potential infringement or licensing opportunities.

3. How does Brazil's patent regulation impact the patenting of pharmaceuticals like BRPI0418228?
Brazil requires demonstrating inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability, with strict scrutiny given to chemical and therapeutic claims, influencing patent scope and validity.

4. What are common pitfalls in patent claims for pharmaceutical inventions in Brazil?
Common pitfalls include overly broad claims lacking inventive step support, insufficient description, or claims that overlap with prior art, risking invalidation.

5. How can companies effectively navigate the patent landscape surrounding BRPI0418228?
Through meticulous patent landscape analysis, infringement risk assessment, strategic claim drafting, and continuous monitoring of new filings and legal developments.


References

  1. INPI - Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office. Patent database for BRPI0418228.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceutical Patents in Brazil.
  3. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9279/1996), relevant guidelines for pharmaceutical patentability.
  4. Recent legal cases and patent opposition proceedings related to pharmaceutical patents in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.