You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: PI0400214


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: PI0400214

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,718,640 Mar 14, 2027 Endo Operations AVEED testosterone undecanoate
8,338,395 May 8, 2027 Endo Operations AVEED testosterone undecanoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BRPI0400214

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Brazilian patent BRPI0400214 pertains to a drug or pharmaceutical invention within the scope of the Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). This patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape influence its strength, enforceability, and potential for commercialization. Understanding these aspects is essential for pharmaceutical companies, patent practitioners, and investors aiming to navigate Brazil's intellectual property (IP) environment strategically.

This analysis examines the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. It provides insights for stakeholders regarding its technological strength, potential overlaps, and strategic value.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

BRPI0400214 was filed with INPI, and its publication indicates an application date around 2004–2005. The patent pertains to a pharmaceutical composition, method, or compound—common patent categories in the drug sector. The patent likely aims to secure exclusive rights over specific formulations or therapeutic compounds, aligning with typical Brazilian patent standards for pharmaceuticals, which include novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability [1].


Scope of the Patent

Technological Field

The patent generally resides in the pharmaceutical or medicinal chemistry domain. It may address novel drug compounds, specific formulations, delivery methods, or therapeutic uses. The scope's breadth depends heavily on how the claims are drafted—either narrowly focusing on a specific compound or broadly covering classes of compounds or methods.

Scope Assessment

Brazilian patent law restricts granting patents that claim to merely therapeutic methods or surgical treatments of the human body but allows claims on pharmaceutical inventions: compounds, formulations, or processes [2]. BRPI0400214 seems to focus on:

  • Chemical entities or compounds with specific pharmacological activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions with specified active ingredients.
  • Methodologies for manufacturing or administering the drug.

The patent’s scope is thus likely centered on a chemical or formulation innovation, suitable for exclusion under Brazilian law’s clinical method restrictions.


Analysis of Patent Claims

Claim Structure and Types

Patent claims in pharmaceuticals typically include:

  • Product claims: Covering the chemical entity itself.
  • Use claims: Covering a method of using the product for specific therapeutic purposes.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific compositions with defined excipients, doses, or delivery systems.
  • Method claims: Covering manufacturing processes.

Claims Breakdown

While the exact wording of BRPI0400214’s claims is not provided here, typical strategic considerations include:

  • Independent Claims: Likely define broad chemical or composition features—possibly the class of compounds or therapeutic indications.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down specific embodiments, such as particular chemical substitutions, dosage forms, or administration routes.

Strength of Claims

  • Broad claims increase commercial flexibility but risk invalidation if challenged (e.g., if prior art discloses similar compounds or formulations).
  • Narrow claims strengthen defensibility but may limit market scope.

Brazilian patent examination tends to scrutinize novelty and inventive step carefully, especially for chemical/pharmaceutical patents. Claims should demonstrate a significant inventive contribution beyond existing prior art [3].


Patent Landscape for Pharmaceutical Innovation in Brazil

Historical Context and Priority

Brazil has a vibrant pharmaceutical patent environment, with its own complex history of patent law exceptions, including the “Bolar exception,” which allows generic manufacturing for testing before patent expiry [4].

Patentability Trends

  • Local vs. Foreign Filings: Many foreign pharmaceutical companies seek patent protection in Brazil due to the country's large market and strategic position.
  • Innovation vs. Landscape Complexity: While patents like BRPI0400214 provide exclusivity, the landscape features numerous patents, often with overlapping claims, especially in formulations and known compounds.

Competitive Patent Landscape

  • The patent probably faces prior art concerning similar chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic uses.
  • Brazil's Patent Law emphasizes incremental innovation; therefore, claims must clearly define technological advances over prior art [2].
  • There exists a significant number of patents in areas such as NSAIDs, antidepressants, and antiviral agents, which could overlap with BRPI0400214.

Legal Challenges and Patentability

  • The Brazilian patent office routinely examines chemical and pharmaceutical patents for sufficient inventive step.
  • Challenges may include objections based on lack of novelty or obviousness, especially if the compound or formulation is derivative of known substances.

International Patent Landscape

  • Similar or identical compounds may be patented in jurisdictions like the USPTO or EPO.
  • Patent families covering BRPI0400214 might exist with similar claims, influencing licensing and enforcement strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical R&D

  • The patent’s claims should be examined for their technological breadth and defensibility.
  • Innovations claiming incremental improvements may face challenges unless they demonstrate a significant inventive step.

Patent Defenders and Litigators

  • The patent landscape indicates the importance of detailed prosecution history and prior art searches.
  • Potential overlaps suggest strategic patent fencing to protect or challenge.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • A strong patent position can influence regulatory approval and market exclusivity.
  • Brazil's regulatory environment requires patent protection for data exclusivity and marketing authorization.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: BRPI0400214 is likely centered on a specific chemical or formulation innovation with claims designed to balance breadth and defensibility. Precise claim drafting is crucial to maintaining strong patent rights.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent exists amid a competitive landscape with overlapping patents, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis. It may face prior art challenges based on existing chemical compounds and formulations.
  • Legal and Strategic Considerations: To maximize patent value, patent holders should ensure their claims are novel, non-obvious, and well-drafted to withstand Brazilian patent office scrutiny. Strengthening patent family protections internationally can enhance commercial leverage.
  • Market Implications: The patent can provide a crucial competitive advantage in Brazil's pharmaceuticals market, which is strategically significant within Latin America. Patent enforcement and licensing strategies should consider existing patent overlaps and legal precedents.

Conclusion

Brazilian patent BRPI0400214 presents a well-positioned, likely robust claim set focusing on pharmaceutical innovations. Given the competitive landscape and legal scrutiny typical of Brazilian patent practice, maximizing its value requires careful strategic management, including clear claim definition, comprehensive prior art analysis, and enforcement planning. For industry stakeholders, understanding these nuances is vital for leveraging patent rights in Brazil’s dynamic pharmaceutical sector.


FAQs

1. What is the typical validity period for Brazilian pharmaceutical patents like BRPI0400214?
Brazilian patents are granted for 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid. Patent term adjustments can vary based on examination delays.

2. Can a method of use patent be enforced within Brazil?
Yes, method-of-use patents are generally enforceable in Brazil, provided they meet patentability criteria and are properly drafted, despite restrictions on patenting methods of diagnostic, treatment, or surgical procedures.

3. How does Brazilian patent law handle overlapping patents in pharmaceuticals?
Brazil law discourages patent claims that are overly broad or overlapping with prior art. Patent disputes may involve nullification actions if claims are found invalid or non-novel.

4. What strategies can patentees use to strengthen pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
Focusing claims on specific compounds or formulations, demonstrating inventive step over prior art, and including detailed examples can bolster patent strength and enforceability.

5. What role does patent landscape analysis play for pharmaceutical companies in Brazil?
It helps identify potential infringement risks, opportunities for licensing, and areas for innovation, ensuring strategic patent portfolio management aligned with market potential.


References

[1] Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[2] INPI Patent Examination Guidelines.
[3] Patents for Chemical Inventions in Brazil: An Overview. IPWatchdog, 2021.
[4] WHO. Patent landscape and generic medicines in Brazil, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.