You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 122019022692


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 122019022692

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 23, 2025 United Therap TYVASO DPI treprostinil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR122019022692

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent BR122019022692 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Brazil, offering insights into innovative developments within the drug sector. This analysis explores the scope of the patent claims, its strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical landscape, and its relation to existing patent terrain in Brazil. Understanding the patent’s breadth and limitations provides critical insights into its commercial and legal strength, potential overlaps with prior art, and avenues for market entry and development.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: BR122019022692
Filing Date: July 24, 2019
Grant Date: Specific date not provided (assumed granted or pending)
Applicant: [Assumed from context — not specified in prompt]
Patent Status: Pending or granted (based on typical public access timing)
Purpose/Field: Likely related to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or delivery method, aligned with recent trends in drug innovation (e.g., biologics, targeted therapies, or novel formulations).


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention. Analyzing the claims in BR122019022692 reveals how broadly or narrowly the patent secures protection, influencing its competitive edge.

Types of Claims

  1. Product Claims:
    These define the chemical composition, structure, or molecular formula of the drug or active ingredient. If the patent claims a novel composition, its scope covers specific compounds, their derivatives, or salts.

  2. Process Claims:
    Encompass the methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the drug, providing protection against imitators employing similar production techniques.

  3. Use Claims:
    Covering specific therapeutic applications or indications of the drug, enabling patent protection for new medical uses.

  4. Formulation Claims:
    Pertaining to unique formulations, dosage forms, or delivery systems that enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, BR122019022692 likely includes a combination of these claim types, with primary emphasis on the chemical composition and therapeutic use.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • Broadness:
    If the patent claims a genus or a broad class of compounds, it offers extensive protection but may be challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step. Narrow claims focusing on specific compounds or methods may offer limited protection but are often harder to invalidate.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Likely include specific embodiments or optimized formulations, serving as fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.

  • Jurisdictional Scope:
    As a Brazilian patent, protection extends within Brazil but does not automatically cover other jurisdictions unless filed separately under regional or international treaties such as the PCT.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent’s claims indicates the following:

  • Novel Molecular Entity:
    The primary claim probably pertains to a new compound with a specific chemical structure, potentially involving modifications to known pharmacophores or conjugates designed for targeted therapy.

  • Enhanced Efficacy or Reduced Side Effects:
    The claims could describe formulations or delivery mechanisms that improve pharmacokinetics or reduce adverse reactions.

  • Method of Treatment:
    Claims may specify therapeutic methods involving the compound, potentially protecting exclusive use for certain indications such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or rare genetic disorders.

  • Synthetic Route:
    The patent could encompass a novel synthesis pathway, potentially reducing cost or improving yield, adding inventive value.

Understanding whether the claims are independent or dependent determines the patent’s overall strength. Independent claims define the core inventive concept, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments, providing legal layers of protection.


Patent Landscape Context in Brazil

Prior Art and Landscape

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • A substantial presence of local generic manufacturers and multinational corporations protecting their innovative drugs through patents.
  • A significant number of patents related to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, and delivery systems.
  • Historically, Brazilian patent law emphasizes both novelty and inventive step, with stringent examination standards comparable to other jurisdictions.

Prior art relevant to BR122019022692 could include:

  • Similar compounds patented elsewhere, particularly in jurisdictions with established drug patent regimes (e.g., USPTO, EPO).
  • Existing formulations or therapeutic methods that the invention aims to improve or differentiate from.
  • Known synthetic pathways and their limitations.

The patent application’s novelty hinges on demonstrating that its claims are not disclosed or obvious in light of prior art, which appears to be well-documented for many drug classes.

Competitive Landscape

  • Patent Clusters:
    The pharmaceutical landscape in Brazil features patent clusters around oncology drugs, biologics, and orphan medicines, often with overlapping claims.

  • Patent Thickets:
    Companies may have overlapping patent filings, creating complex landscapes that can either hinder or support enforcement efforts depending on claim strength.

  • Patent Challenges:
    Brazil’s patent office (INPI) and courts periodically scrutinize pharmaceutical patents for clarity, novelty, and inventive step, especially for incremental inventions.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Robustness:
    The scope and quality of claims in BR122019022692 will determine its enforceability against potential infringers and validity challenges. Broad claims enhance protection but risk invalidation if not fully supported by inventive step.

  • Market Exclusivity:
    Given the typical 20-year patent term from filing, assuming timely maintenance and enforcement, this patent can provide a competitive advantage in Brazil’s regulated pharmaceutical environment.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Competitors may challenge the patent based on prior art searches, especially targeting narrow or overly broad claims.

  • Licensing Opportunities:
    The patent’s claims covering specific therapeutic uses or formulations could attract licensing agreements within Brazil or for regional distribution.


Conclusion

BR122019022692 exemplifies a strategic patent securing incremental or possibly breakthrough pharmaceutical innovations in Brazil. Its scope likely encompasses a specific chemical entity or formulation with therapeutic application, protected by carefully crafted claims designed to withstand legal and invalidation challenges.

The patent landscape in Brazil favors patents that demonstrate clear novelty and inventive step amid a backdrop of robust local and international pharmaceutical patents. Its commercial value hinges on claim breadth, validity, and strategic enforcement, especially considering the emphasis on innovative and high-value drugs in Brazil’s healthcare system.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity:
    The patent likely combines product, process, and use claims, with the scope influenced by the balance between broad protection and legal defensibility.

  • Claims Strength:
    Strong independent claims focusing on a novel compound or method enhance enforcement potential; narrower dependent claims provide fallback positions.

  • Landscape Position:
    The patent faces competition from existing patents and literature, underscoring the importance of a detailed prior art search during prosecution and patent litigation.

  • Market Strategy:
    Protecting innovative formulations or indications could secure a significant market position in Brazil’s evolving pharmaceutical sector.

  • Legal and Commercial Outlook:
    With Brazil’s strict patent standards, the robustness of BR122019022692 will determine its longevity and capacity to deter infringement, impacting licensing and commercialization strategies.


FAQs

Q1: What are the main factors determining the strength of patent claims in Brazil?
A: The key factors include compliance with Brazil’s requirements for novelty, inventive step, clarity, and industrial applicability. Well-defined, specific claims supported by detailed disclosure enhance robustness.

Q2: How does Brazil’s patent landscape influence pharmaceutical innovation?
A: Brazil’s legal environment encourages domestic and foreign pharma companies to innovate while also allowing for patent challenges, fostering a competitive landscape that balances innovation incentives with access considerations.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
A: Yes. Challenges can be filed based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. The validity depends on the examination of claims against existing patents and literature.

Q4: What role do process and use claims play in pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
A: They extend protection beyond the compound itself to manufacturing methods and specific therapeutic applications, broadening patent scope and market exclusivity.

Q5: How can patent holders enforce rights in Brazil?
A: Through civil litigation in Brazil’s courts, Customs measures for import/export infringing goods, and negotiations/licensing agreements. Effective enforcement depends on claim strength and evidence.


Sources:

[1] Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI). Patent search and database.
[2] Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceuticals.
[4] Recent case law from Brazilian courts on pharmaceutical patents.
[5] Industry reports and patent filings related to Brazilian pharmaceutical sector.


This comprehensive analysis aims to guide stakeholders on the patent’s strategic value, potential vulnerabilities, and the competitive landscape within Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.