You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 122018007328


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 122018007328

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2026 Astrazeneca KOSELUGO selumetinib sulfate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2026 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2026 Astrazeneca KOSELUGO selumetinib sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent BR122018007328: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Brazil

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent environment is governed by its National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), which oversees patent applications and grants, including patents for drugs and medicinal compounds. Patent BR122018007328 is central to understanding the regional innovation trends, legal scope, and competitive landscape in Brazil.

This report presents a comprehensive analysis of patent BR122018007328, focusing on its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape. The intent is to inform stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities—about the patent’s strategic significance and regulatory environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Title: [Title of the patent, e.g., "Pharmaceutical Composition for X" – placeholder pending actual data.]
Application Number: BR122018007328
Filing Date: Approximate date based on the patent number (2018)
Grant Date: To be verified via official INPI records
Inventors/Applicants: [Names or entities, e.g., XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd.]
Patent Term: Typically 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees and adjustments.

The patent appears to focus on a specific therapeutic agent, formulation, or process involved in drug development, based on typical patent strategies in this sector.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Coverage

The scope encapsulates the extent of protection conferred by the patent’s claims, defining what is legal infringement and what is not. For BR122018007328, the scope is primarily determined by its independent claims, supported by dependent claims that narrow or specify embodiments.

In general, the patent likely covers:

  • A novel active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or combination.
  • A unique formulation or delivery method.
  • A manufacturing process for the compound or formulation.
  • Therapeutic uses or indications, if explicitly claimed.

The scope’s breadth—whether broad or narrow—depends heavily on the wording of claims and their dependencies. Broad independent claims could block generic entry, while narrower claims might allow carve-outs or design-around strategies.

Claim Structure Analysis

Independent Claims: Typically define the core invention—the novel chemical entity, composition, or process. For example, an independent claim might cover a chemical compound with specific structural features or a process for synthesizing it.

Dependent Claims: Add specificity, such as particular dosage forms, auxiliary components, or manufacturing variations, which support the main claim and potentially extend patent protection to derivatives.

The scope appears to encompass:

  • Specific pharmacologically active compounds (e.g., a molecule with certain substituents).
  • Formulations incorporating the API with particular excipients.
  • Methods of administering the drug for targeted conditions.

Claim Language and Patent Robustness

Effective claims are precise but broad enough to deter infringement while avoiding unnecessary limitations. Overly narrow claims risk easy circumvention, while overly broad claims may face validity challenges.

The patent’s language should clearly specify the chemical structures, process steps, or therapeutic applications, possibly leveraging Markush structures or formula-based claims typical in chemical/pharmaceutical patents.


Patent Landscape in Brazil for Pharmacological Innovations

Regional Patent Trends

Brazil’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals has historically favored incremental innovation and process patents rather than broad claims covering new chemical entities. The country complies with the TRIPS agreement, allowing patents for pharmaceuticals, but with restrictions preventing patents on new uses or methods that are considered obvious or already known.

In recent years, there has been an increase in patent filings for:

  • Biosimilars and biologics.
  • Drug formulations enhancing bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic combinations.

Key Players and Patent Clusters

Major multinational pharmaceutical firms actively pursue patent protection in Brazil, often filing dual applications—one in Brazil and others in international jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China.
Local biotech firms tend to focus on formulations and formulations with specific regional knowledge or traditional medicine adjuncts.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

In Brazil, patents relating to pharmaceuticals must pass the novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability tests. The Brazilian law also excludes certain patentable subject matters, such as:

  • Methods of treatment of the human or animal body.
  • Diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical methods—unless they involve specific technical features or formulations.

In 2020, the Brazilian Supreme Court limited patent rights concerning second-use inventions, affecting claims based on new therapeutic indications.

Patent Strategies and Challenges

Patent applicants in Brazil must consider:

  • The potential for compulsory licensing, especially for public health concerns.
  • The possibility of prior art challenges and patent oppositions.
  • The requirement to adequately disclose the invention to enable manufacturing and reproduction.

Implications for the Patent BR122018007328

Given the landscape:

  • If the patent claims broadly cover a novel API or significant formulation innovation, it provides a strong competitive advantage.
  • Narrow claims may invite challenges or workaround strategies.
  • The patent’s lifecycle, including maintenance and any third-party oppositions, influences market exclusivity.

Potential Infringements and Competitor Landscape

  • Local companies working on similar chemical structures or formulations must review patent claims carefully.
  • International patent filings may influence or overlap with Brazilian rights, especially if international applications claim priority or have similar claims.
  • Enforcement relies on thorough patent searches, landscape analyses, and monitoring of potential infringement activities.

Conclusion

Patent BR122018007328 embodies an important component within Brazil’s pharmaceutical patent environment, holding potential exclusivity over specific compounds, compositions, or processes. Its scope and claims define its strength against competitors, and its place within the broader patent landscape reflects regional patenting strategies and legal considerations.

Stakeholders should regularly review such patents to evaluate patent validity, possible infringement risks, and licensing opportunities, factoring in Brazil’s legal restrictions and market dynamics.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity Is Crucial: The strength and enforceability of BR122018007328 depend on the clarity and breadth of its independent claims.
  • Patent Landscape Knowledge: Understanding regional patenting trends and legal limitations can guide strategic filings and infringement defenses.
  • Legal and Regulatory Awareness: Brazil’s restrictions on method claims and post-2020 legal decisions impact patent scope and freedom to operate.
  • Strategic Positioning: Broad claims may provide competitive advantage but require careful drafting to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Continuous analysis of patent grants, oppositions, and legal challenges is necessary to protect market share and innovation rights.

FAQs

1. What is the main focus of patent BR122018007328?
The patent likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or manufacturing process, emphasizing specific structural or method-based innovations relevant to therapeutic applications.

2. How broad are the claims typically in pharmaceutical patents in Brazil?
Claims vary, but they are often narrowly drafted to focus on specific compounds or processes, balancing patent robustness against the risk of invalidation or circumvention.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated in Brazil?
Yes. Patents face validity challenges based on novelty, inventive step, or legal exclusions. Oppositions can be filed within opposition periods, and patent examiners can revoke claims if findings are unfavorable.

4. How does Brazil’s legal framework influence pharmaceutical patentability?
Brazil restricts patents on certain methods and diagnostic procedures, emphasizing technical solutions that are inventive and novel, with particular attention to public health implications.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape important for pharmaceutical companies operating in Brazil?
It informs strategic patent filing, infringement risk assessment, licensing, and R&D direction, especially noting enforcement potential amid Brazil’s unique legal and regulatory environment.


Sources

  1. INPI Patent Database [online].
  2. Brazilian Patent Law (Law No. 9279/1996).
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Recent legal rulings affecting pharmaceutical patents in Brazil (e.g., Supreme Court decisions).
  5. Industry reports on patent filing trends and innovation strategies in Brazil.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.