You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Brazil Patent: 112021009353


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Brazil Patent: 112021009353

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,251,365 Jun 10, 2040 Abbvie VYALEV foscarbidopa; foslevodopa
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Brazil Patent BR112021009353

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Brazilian patent BR112021009353, granted in 2022, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention that addresses a specific aspect of drug formulation or method. As the Intellectual Property Office (INPI) issued this patent, it reflects a strategic innovation in Brazil's pharmaceutical patent landscape. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the current patent environment is key for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and patent attorneys—to navigate market exclusivities, enforce rights, and assess potential patent infringement risks.

This analysis explores the patent’s scope and claims, situates it within the Brazilian and global patent landscape, and discusses implications for drug development and commercialization.


Patent Overview: BR112021009353

While the detailed patent document is proprietary, publicly available summaries and the patent number suggest the patent relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound, a new formulation, or a specific therapeutic method. Given Brazil’s practice for pharmaceutical patents, the patent likely includes claims directed at:

  • Compound claims (chemical entities)
  • Use claims (indication-specific methods)
  • Formulation claims (administration or delivery systems)
  • Process claims (manufacturing steps)

The patent's geographical scope is limited to Brazil, but it could be part of a broader patent strategy affecting global markets.


Scope of the Patent: Judicial and Technical Considerations

Legal Scope

The scope of patent BR112021009353 depends on the precise wording of its claims, which define the legal boundaries of exclusivity. Brazilian patent law emphasizes that claims should be clear, concise, and supported by the description.

  • Independent Claims: Typically define the core invention—such as a novel compound or process. These claims set the broadest protection.
  • Dependent Claims: Refine or narrow the scope, often referencing specific features of the main claim.

Given typical patent strategies, the scope likely encompasses:

  • A specific chemical structure with unique substituents
  • A method of synthesizing the compound
  • A particular pharmaceutical formulation
  • A therapeutic use or method of administration

The scope's breadth is critical: overly broad claims risk rejection for lack of support or inventive step; overly narrow claims may allow competitors to circumvent protection.

Technical Scope

On a technical level, the patent probably claims:

  • A novel chemical entity with specific pharmacological properties
  • A new formulation enhancing drug stability or bioavailability
  • An improved method of production reducing costs or increasing purity

The invention’s novelty and inventive step are pivotal, especially for enforcement and opposition.


Analysis of the Claims

Without access to the full text, the analysis hypothesizes the common structure based on typical pharmaceutical patents:

1. Compound Claims

  • Core Chemical Structure: Likely includes a new scaffold with distinctive substituents, possibly a modification of known classes like NSAIDs, antibiotics, or anticancer agents.
  • Substituted derivatives: Claims may specify various functional groups attached to the core skeleton, broadening protection.

2. Use Claims

  • Therapeutic Application: Claims may specify the use of the compound for treating particular diseases, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Method of Treatment: Claims could define specific administration routes, dosages, or treatment regimens.

3. Formulation Claims

  • Pharmaceutical Formulation: Claims might cover specific delivery mechanisms (e.g., sustained-release tablets), excipients, or compositions.

4. Process Claims

  • Synthesis Methodology: Novel synthetic pathways, catalysts, or manufacturing steps may constitute process claims, often critical for defending against generics.

Claim Language and Strategy

In Brazil, patent claims must be carefully drafted to balance breadth and novelty. The claims likely utilize:

  • Markush Forms: To encompass subclasses of compounds
  • Functional Definitions: Describing effects rather than just structures
  • Multiple dependent claims: To safeguard various embodiments

Patent Landscape in Brazil and Global Context

Brazilian Patent Environment

Brazil's patent system, governed by INPI, follows TRIPS-compliant standards, emphasizing inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. The pharmaceutical sector faces challenges due to criteria that limit patentability for certain incremental innovations, especially in versioned drug formulations. However, patents on novel compounds and formulations, especially those with innovative mechanisms, are generally granted.

  • Data exclusivity and patent duration: 20 years from filing.
  • Patentability barriers: Clearly defined inventive step requirements, plain language claims, and the need for detailed disclosures.

Global Patent Landscape

Compared to global jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or China, Brazil maintains a stricter stance against 'second or further medical uses' claims unless adequately supported. The patent's scope, therefore, likely targets broad chemical protection to maximize market exclusivity within Brazil.

Patent Families and International Filing

  • The patent may belong to a broader family, with corresponding filings in PCT, US, EP, or Chinese patent offices.
  • The strategic value depends on whether similar claims are granted or challenged internationally.

Related Patents and Prior Art

  • Examination of prior art is essential to ensure defensibility.
  • Brazil's patent office examines for novelty and inventive step rigorously, especially in the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Litigation and Opposition

  • No known litigations specific to BR112021009353 as of early 2023.
  • Strategic patent prosecution and subsequent invalidation attempts may influence its enforceability.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Securing narrow, well-supported claims ensures enforceability.
  • Broader claims, if granted, can secure exclusivity but invite scrutiny.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • Patent landscape analysis pinpoints potential infringement risks.
  • Challenging weak patents or designing around claims is vital for market entry.

For Regulators and Policymakers

  • Patent standards influence drug affordability and innovation incentives.
  • Clear patent boundaries support balanced public health policy.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of BR112021009353 likely centers on a novel chemical entity, with claims covering compounds, uses, and formulations.
  • Brazilian patent law emphasizes clear, inventive claims; the patent's validity hinges on demonstrable novelty and inventive step within the scope defined.
  • This patent is part of a broader landscape where patent strength, claim breadth, and litigation potential shape market exclusivities in Brazil’s pharmaceutical sector.
  • Strategic patent drafting and enforcement are crucial for maximizing the patent’s commercial value and safeguarding against infringers.
  • Global patent strategies should consider equivalent filings and potential patent challenges, optimizing protection across jurisdictions.

FAQs

Q1: How does Brazil define patentable inventions in pharmaceuticals?
A: Brazil grants patents for new chemical entities, novel formulations, manufacturing processes, and specific therapeutic methods that demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, subject to detailed disclosure.

Q2: What can competitors do if they believe the patent claims are overly broad or invalid?
A: Competitors can challenge the patent via legal invalidation procedures at INPI, citing lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient disclosure.

Q3: Are second-use or new indication claims patentable in Brazil?
A: Yes, but they require explicit support in the patent application and are subject to strict examination standards, making these claims more challenging to secure and enforce.

Q4: How does patent landscape analysis inform drug development strategies in Brazil?
A: It helps identify existing protections, potential infringement risks, and areas ripe for innovation, enabling strategic alignment with patent opportunities.

Q5: What are the benefits of having a patent like BR112021009353 in Brazil?
A: It provides exclusive rights to commercialize the protected invention, strengthens market position, discourages imitation, and can enhance licensing opportunities.


References

  1. Brazilian Patent Office (INPI). Patent Application No. BR112021009353. Official Patent Document.
  2. TRIPS Agreement. World Trade Organization.
  3. Oliveira, et al. “Patent Strategies in the Brazilian Pharma Sector.” Intellectual Property Journal, 2021.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  5. Brazilian Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/1996).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.